Quote:
Originally Posted by irishjg10
I'm afraid I do not agree with you "the legendary spitfire" when you say its ok for CTA games. If I'm starting into a CTA game and see some lunatic deciding he's up for using a fortress against me, I already know he's brown bread before the game even starts. Firstly you'll have captured the field long before he gets into a position to bomb you or capture the field himself. Secondly with the exception of the po2 153 i16 or Arado (no guns) nothing else as far as i can think would have any problem with boom and zoom attacks on the 17. Thats without using rockets of course. I'm not going to mention the Unmentionable but you all know what I'm talking about there. That one's got a fork in it !!!
|
+1
B-17 in CTA is effectivly a non player for his team. Same goes for using a B-17 in a dogfight/team battle, you are relying on getting kills though other people attacking you with the wrong plane and wrong tactics, if you joined a game full of skilled players and used a B-17 you would be ignored by energy fighters and blown away by the heavy hitting bomber attack planes, there is nothing you can do no matter how skillfull you are, you will be useless. B-17s in strike is fine as long as you make sure someone else is in one for the other side too to make it fair. Anyone who tail chases a B-17 should be killed, that is not the way for a fighter to deal with one. As Irish says boom and zoom with a fighter designed to take down B-17s (G6,K4,190D,262,162,163), hit them before they can aim at you. Really the B-17 should take quite a bit more damage than it does in this game, for example all 4 engines act as one so if lose an engine your dead, if you get a very damaged engine you lose throttle and power for the other 3 engines aswell, pilot kill deaths shouldn't be so easy as another of the crew could easily take control.
So you see LegendarySpit how much better the B-17 could have been. Maybe then it would have been a gamebreaker.