LTBear..
I think this has been chewed to death on the UBI forum and if I'm not mistaken about this being the same document discussed, some points to consider.
- The FW tested was not at peak performance for fuel, maintenance reasons.
- It looked to be a Jabo version which generally had more armour plating = heavier.
You'll also notice a glaring contradiction in the document you linked.
The bit about how easy the engine management was, and how the allied test pilots found this to be a problem ????
From this document you cannot conclude a definitive acceleration/turning/performance figure for the FW.
