Quote:
Originally Posted by I/ZG52_HaDeS
An something else:
Everybody complains about the "sniper gunners". Well, there is a parameter that defines the "angle error" of the 'bullet", for each weapon.
This is the "Dispersion" of each gun. The Sniper value is the ZERO dispersion, and the more we increase it, the less accurate this weapon is,
and thus the gunner.
Lets see the Berezin B-20 20mm Soviet cannon when mounts a defensive installation in a bomber:
maxDeltaAngle = 0.0F;
It means that despite it is mounted in a flexible defensive installation its dispersion value is "0", meaning that chances are you get a bullet in your head in no-time.
Lets check the German MG151/20 when mounted in a defensive installation:
maxDeltaAngle = 0.25F;
It has a considerable dispersion value so you won't get a bullet in your head so easily. But still this value is somehow high
compared with the value that the same weapon has when mounted in a plane.
And last lets check the MG131 when it mounts a defensive position:
maxDeltaAngle = 0.24F;
Again, you are fee to judge  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by I/ZG52_HaDeS
Do you REALLY want to start over this?
Come on, 
And you confirmed that i was right about the 20mm sniper-gun. Thank you for this.
And about the bombs:
So it is Perfectly OK Bombs of the SAME "family", having the SAME weight to have 3+ times greater effective radius?
There are data, yes. So you say that you haven't found any? And again, what makes you think that a bomb of the same weight using the same technology can have >3 times more the effective radius?
|
Start? No. I'll let the readers be be the judge of your posts.
You were right about something? I wouldn't go that far. Maybe in your political views you lean to the right.
I was perfectly clear about the bombs effectiveness. Without historical evidence and/or documents, the numbers stay the same as they are. There is no other option.
Anything else?