
10-16-2010, 10:05 AM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,037
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisDNT
+++++++++++++++++++++++
wow guys, you really need to get you're monitors calibrated.
Nealy all of furbs photographs need some adjustments.
some even have a purple magenta cast LOL.
Certaily teh Isle of Wight one is all wrong
Reread oleg's comments about colours and perception.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
It's right, some of theses pictures have too vivid colors (but from the right shades of green), but on the other hand, the colors of the screenshots have become, this week, from too much vivid to too much pastel, and still with a wrong palette for the described area.
Btw, any medium capturing photons, either human eyes or a camera sensor, gives by definition its own rendering of reality (just compare for instance the differences between the Canon rendering and the Nikon rendering, or even more impressive the differences between the Bayer technology and the Foveon technology). At the times of the film technology, the rendering between Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 64 were different too, so were different the renderings between Velvia, Sensia and Provia.
That's to say that absolute veracity of a rendering is by definition a non-sense question (any medium is an aspect of the reality, not the reality), but what can be nevertheless attained is a common accurate probability of what is rendered. As an example, among photographers, it was commonly accepted that Provia gave a more realistic rendering of the reality than Velvia. But was Provia rendering the reality in an absolute exact way ? of course not.
|
Nice comment. And right comment. I would add diffent compacts from which most of the shots we ussually see looking in exif of the shot
|