Quote:
Originally Posted by WTE_Galway
Isn't that the whole point. NP claim that free track did NOT make a better product they just a found a way to use the NP interface without paying for it.
From the NP point of view free track should have designed their own interface and encouraged game developers to implement it and not used the proprietary NP one. What NP then did was encrypted their own interface so freetrack etc would have to design their own interface instead of freeloading on NP.
|
Biggest NP lie ever. FreeTrack have own interface and SDK. You can use even the raw data of head tracking... Ft software is really open.
But NP "forces" some companies to use your proprietary API.
And it isn't fair. NP lies, NP didn't "created" nothing new, etc.
We FreeTrack users don't care about anything NP does, if our games don't get blocked to use FreeTrack API. ArmAII uses FreeTrack API, DCS : BS don't. Why?
If people want to make a stand for NP, be better informed, please. Whe FT users aren't whinners without a reason: we have to deal with unfair market policies by NP.