Quote:
Originally Posted by ECV56_Lancelot
Well, i also play full real, and prefer to play with real distances, but if i have to fly online wars, and my time is short because of my real live, certainly i prefer an scaled down real map that give me the oportunity to play the mission, and not be forced to not playing it because i dont have enough time.
If i have the time 1:1 map is certainly my preference, but sometime i only have one hour or one hour and half to play, that´s very likely to left me out of playing if the mission requires long time flying.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friendly_flyer
I want a big whooping map of the English Channel for my ultra real campaign, and a host of smaller maps (scaled down, fantasy maps, maps of other areas) for my fun-fun enjoyment.
See, that wasn't so hard?
|
I think that's the main point here. Give people enough options and everyone will be happy. Imagine if we didn't have realism options in IL2 and we had to fly with external views enabled all the time, or with locked cockpit views all the time...half the people would be unhappy with the settings all the time. Giving the user options means that everyone is happy with his settings all the time, they just can't play on the same server because of their different settings.
For single player it's definitely not a problem at all. As for multiplayer it's still not a problem, at least in my personal opinion. There's always enough full real servers to fly on and i generally only fly on 2-3 of them most of the time. Some people will want to fly a simulator, some will want to play a game and some will want a bit of both, it's all good.
