View Single Post
  #791  
Old 05-01-2010, 03:37 PM
Adwark Adwark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Latvia
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyJWest View Post
Yes, but you are comparing the P-51 to the Mosquito. I Asked for "evidence that the DH Mosquito was designed to lower G-loading standards than similar metal-construction aircraft". I don't see how a single seater fighter can be 'similar" to a twin engined bomber/night fighter in this context.

I can't see any stated G-load limitations in the Mosquito document anyway, so this doesn't really help.
AndyJWest you was misunderstand me. I wasn't compared P-51 and DH Mosquito. You was right, it isn't similar. I was only illustrated a metal and a wood constructions limitations. G limit is a "IL-2 Sturmovik" game feature, who simplify simulated a forces has affected flying aircraft. The game wood construction strengthen can be stronger like metal. Flaying limitations in P-51 and Mosquito pilot manuals is a G limit. Sorry, but I hasn't real aircrafts G limit comparison tables. We can compared only flaying limitations in pilots manuals or calculate and compared aircraft strength in different flying modes, but this is a hard work. So, let's look in pilot manual, Mosquito hasn't a diving limitation. P-51 has and can diving beyond 75% of the speed of sound.
Question: Is it meaning, Mosquito is stronger like P-51? Why DH Mosquito hasn't diving limitation, but P-51 has? Is it meaning, fully loaded real DH Mosquito can diving without limits?
The game Mosquito can. Is it right?
__________________
CPU i7-4770/MB MSI Z87-G45/RAM DDR3 8Gb Patriot Black Mamba 2133MHz/Video MSI GeForce GTX580 Twin Froz II/SSD Corsair Force 3 240Gb /Audio Creative SB-XFi/ Monitor EIZO Nano FlexScan EV2736W 2560x1440/ Saitek X52 Pro & Pro Flight Rudder pedals