Yes. I agree. Me and most fans speak what he wants and wants hardcore truck simulation.
I also not understand where Softlab came out that people want to racing? Who wants it?? Almost nobody. Who wants the mission.? Ok fun fun, but as an extension! The simulator has to be first-Physics, functionality, created by real models, realistic gaming environment ... etc and when it is left up to the time of the mission. When is a good multi-game mission to do myself on my career. in the process. (When the multifunctionality)
Yes. I agree ....
But I disagree with SCS. I'm Czech. SCS is a Czech company, so I should be patriotic, but SCS is the same crap if not worse. SCS is a physics problem complete. Because it has a terrible game engine. SCS original game is terrible. It was just saving modifications. I can not play the game at all SCS. I throw at it. But everything could change if SCS produce quality multi-engine and the physics, then everything changes.!!! ...
It's just if I choose SCS or RNR?? I say neither want. But he said that if I choose to say RNR. Why? RNR has a basis. Better game engine for possible modifications in the RNR, etc. I see only one. Basis. There could be build. SCS for games is not good engine. There will not allow the game engine.
The problem is that there NO TRUCK simulation. That is the problem why people are dissatisfied. Therefore expected from the RNR-quality simulation.
This is not a problem racing cars simulators. There exist simulations LFS, RBR, iRacing .. etc. So I was not interested in arcade Dirt, Grid, a game from Codemasters, etc. There are other simulators, and you just. But it does not apply to Truck Simulator. This simulation is not one and you can choose to collect the waste left Softlab SCS and arcades.
Perhaps because so much expectation from the RNR. Disappointed. Only a dozen truck game
If trucks were not in the game, so it makes no sense to even the RNR interest. By the RNR nobody cared ...:/