Quote:
Originally Posted by FM_Von_Manstein
Stupidest thing I have ever heard in my life. The KV-1 was very mechanically unreliable, more than the Tiger in fact. Its only advantage was it's armor, and that became penetrable frontally in 1942. It's poor speed made it an easy target for planes and artillery fire. And it's gun was just average, obsolete by 1942.
|
KV2 was NOT unreliable. Sure, it had some mechanical problems due 2 its extreme weight but...
There are accounts of single KV-1's holding off an entire Panzer division (a bridge) and 5 KV-1's ambushing and slaughtering a panzer column. Its gun could kill anything in 1941.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FM_Von_Manstein
Yes. Long barrels have higher muzzle velocity, and therefor better penetration, range and accuracy.
In terms of guns. Muzzle Velocity=Penetration and size=damage done with HE rounds.
I'm pretty sure the armor thickness is correct. T-34/76 and T-34/85 were both pretty weak in terms or armor. Very vulnerable, German 37mm AT guns could penetrate frontal armor under 100m IIRC, and 50mm AT guns at even longer ranges.
|
Nah, it was impervious of fire from 37mm guns. I don't know about 50mm though I doubt it. The Germans often had 2 use howitzers to take out a T-34/76
I voted for the Centurion. It just has this awesome charm!