Quote:
Originally Posted by MikkOwl
"Dongles", not dangles.
'Hacking into' is no different than interfacing with something. Just because they don't want people to do it does not give them a right to stop people from doing it.
|
1st point...
"When the argument is lax attack the spelling errors", eh?
2nd point...
you've killed any further credible input you may have had with point 1, but you've further killed off any credible input you may have had with just those two last sentenctes quoted....
It gives them every right to stop someone hacking into their software, whether you like it or not.
Why do you support hacking?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikkOwl
"The legal right granted to an author, composer, playwright, publisher, or distributor to exclusive publication, production, sale, or distribution of a literary, musical, dramatic, or artistic work."
I don't think there's a case for this being about copyright. Copyright is about 'making copies' rights, not use rights.
Wolf, I think it is 'license' related rather.
|
copyright [ kóppi rīt ]
noun (plural copyrights)
Definition:
creative artist's control of original work: the legal right of creative artists or publishers to control the use and reproduction of their original works
http://uk.encarta.msn.com/dictionary...copyright.html
where did your "definition" come from Mikkowl?
?