Quote:
Originally Posted by Elias_Maluco
Which will make the game even easier. I try to beat battles with as few losses has I can, but will only replay a battle if the results are really catastrophic.
Actually, trying to always go for no-losses forces you to exploit the game in the cheapest ways. It can be hard, in a puzzle game like way, but it also makes it really boring, IMHO.
A much more exciting challenge would be "no-reload" (= play it like a "roguelike"), I intend to try it next time.
|
This really isn't true. Don't get in a huff thinking that people going for no loss victories are some kind of stuck up anal retentive crowd. But rather, have played through the game on hard difficulties, without worrying about losses, but having few, it is an interesting additional challenge to play through the game again trying to get no losses in those areas where you have.
I wouldn't play every game like this, just as an additional goal once I start feeling competent at the game.
The only exploit I see a lot of no-lossers do is map kiting (It isn't required though, I don't do it).
I think that it can feel intimidating to go on a forum like this one, and see a lot of the diehards talking about no-loss wins. It makes it seem like EVERYONE but you is doing it, and that maybe it is a benchmark for how good of a player you are. But it isn't. It is just a different puzzle to solve.