Quote:
Originally Posted by luthier
http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/IMG_0249.JPG
Partial view of Roman Deniskin, resident mad genius
He's one of the original members of the crew that made Il-2 what it is. For BoB, he is in charge of everything that has to do with aircraft: graphics, damage models, FM, cockpits, weapons, etc.
|
Translation...he's the poor guy whose scalp everyone will be after once the sim has been released
Great update by the way and nice to see the people behind the product, it lends the feel of a living organism to it and not just a collection of pretty pictures and some thousands lines of code. I also like the fact that your workplace looks a bit "messy", it shows that things are getting done at a pace where you can't even afford to tidy up your desk. A workspace that's disorganized in an organized fashion is always better than a tidy one..."Hey, i know i have all this stuff lying around on my desk, but at least i have everything i need right in front of me", so don't worry about the people complaining about how it looks, some of us like it:
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlipBall
Is the office really an important observation here worth mentioning...its dry, its warm, and it looks good to me... |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feuerfalke
Using CRTs is hardly a hint for lacking behind modern hardware. Depending on what you are working on, old CRTs can present you a better idea of realistic colors than most common TFTs do.  |
Exactly. I switched my trusty 17" CRT for a 22" Dell 2209WA a few months ago. Don't get me wrong, i love the bigger flat panel and it's a very close match to CRT standards at a very good price, but there's yet no way for a TFT to match CRT performance in its entirety. If it's got a good response time it will be a TN panel with horrible viewing angles and poor colour representation, if it's got realistic colours it will be a PVA with ghosting and gamma shift issues and if it's got good viewing angles it will be an expensive IPS panel monitor with inaccurate black colour, not to mention the chance of getting dead pixels, backlight bleed and so on regardless of panel type.
CRTs are reliable, can run all kinds of resolutions so you won't have to upgrade your graphics card because it can't run the latest new game at your TFT's native 1920x1200, and are not a strain to the eyes at all as long as you run them at decent refresh rates (85hz for example). The main issue is that due to weight and bulkiness you won't see many 22" and above widescreen CRTs, but if there was such a market at reasonable prices i would probably consider getting one.
Another thing to note is that movies and games might look good on those TFT wide-gamut monitors with glossy panels, but when you want photorealism you need a monitor that displays accurate colors and not enhanced ones. And for that, on a CRT you just have to open the on-screen menu and select "color temperature:5500 Kelvins".
To get the same on a TFT you have to pay for a factory pre-calibrated monitor like Eizo, which due to the increased work-hours per monitor means paying almost double the price of an identical non-calibrated one, or get a calibration kit and do it yourself,starting from $200. I'm not saying "death to the TFT", but when you factor in the cost and purpose of use it's much more cost effective to stick with the CRTs. TFTs are good for playing the game in all its widescreen glory, CRTs and standard-gamut monitors in general are good for making the game without spending extra money on getting accurate colors for your modellers