View Single Post
  #24  
Old 10-06-2009, 03:14 AM
Robotic Pope's Avatar
Robotic Pope Robotic Pope is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire,England,UK
Posts: 1,520
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MorgothNL View Post
Well, I finaly have the G-10.. and it is a bummer . I'm starting to like the me109's, they are more fun to fly than the spit, because you need to do more than turning to win the battle.
I've been flying with the K-4 and F-4 mostly till I unlocked the G-10.

The G-10 flies ok, but its cannons leave a questionamark . Isnt the G-10 supposed to have a powerfull 30mm nosecannon? This one has the same armament as the F-4 and G-2. It turns worse, and is only slightly faster . I thought it would fly it bit nicer than the K-4, and had a 30mm.

the G-10 is crap no reason what so ever to pick this one over a F-4 or K-4/G-6.

Devs... could you plz give it a 30mm cannon
And while we are at it, maybe have a look at the 37mm????? yak-9T cannon (its not a 37mm, it feels like 3.7mm)
Or how about the K-4 without the gunpods.. the 30mm cannon and 2 machineguns are all I need, its a shame the gunpods are no choice, they ruin the manouvrebility of the K-4

Sorry for bringing up this old post, but I wanted to share my opinion on the G-10, now that I finally have it
MorgothNL, I believe the G-10 did have a 20mm cannon. But I think it was a new, lighter and faster firing cannon than the old 20mm. That was the whole point of the G-10. The G series of 109 had become so fat with guns to destroy bombers that it could no longer dogfight. The G-10 was designed to be much lighter so it could provide fighter cover for the G-6's and Fw190's that would take on the bombers. That is also why you would never see a G-10 with gondola cannons.

So in theory it should fly more like the 109F. Whether this id the case in BoP I don't know. I haven't unlocked the G-10 yet.
__________________


XBL GT: - Robotic Pope
HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope
Reply With Quote