Quote:
Originally Posted by Soviet Ace
I actually prefer the F4 or G2 to the other 109s, but that's me. They seem to handle better for what I have the notches set at. The G10, either on BoP or 1946, I never liked it because of its weight. Same with the K4, I always stuck with the Fs and G2.
|
I like how the F-4 flies. But it armament seems to be verry weak. The 109's fly worse than the spits, any turning battle with a spit will be lost by the 109. So, when I DO get behind the spits etc, I want the armament to shoot them down in a burst. The G-6 and K-4 can do this, but they dont fly well.
The 109's just feel underpowerd. Their nosecannon shoot rip appart wings with easy, but the armament if the spits, feels at least 3x as powerfull. this combined with the better manouvrebility of the spits, gives no reason to take a 109
.
I fly 109 now because I like the challenge. But whenever I come up against someone just as good as me, but in a spit, there is not much I can do. Even if im able to get behind him, than the armament of the F-4 will not have the power to instantly kill him. With the spit a burst is often more than enough.
Just a question now after this: was the 20mm nosecannon more powerfull than the 20mm cannons of the spits? (talking about real historical planes)