Quote:
Originally Posted by NephilimUK
Whilst I'm on the subject, wtf is it with everyone choosing fighters in games of strike?  - I know that it's a cheap way of racking up some (easier) kills - but surely, helping your team get a win is just as important? |
I always take a fighter, and it does help the team to win.
I normally coordinate what to do with ancient seraph, he normally takes the B-17 if the enemy has one. Now, easy example, if it is 2vs2. Me in a 109 G-6 and teammate in a B-17, vs a B-17 and an blenheim. As long as I keep shooting down the B-17, we will win, since the teammate B-17 will score much more then the enemy blenheim.
If I had also taken a bomber, It would have been a much closer game, bacause then it is all about hitting the targets better then the opponent.
Now I just keep the B-17 out of the sky, ensuring victory
EDIT: when 'mission completed' comes up, it is counted as a win (so being in the winning team in enough). And as far as I know, all planes that appear as a triagle on the map (bombers, Il-2, JU etc), are counted as bomber