![]() |
F4U Takeoff problem
1 Attachment(s)
Hi, I've been reading some topics on this but I can't find anything conclusive.
Basically, I used to fly the F4U when I started playing IL-2 and had no problems with it. I've returned to the game recently (4.11.1) and wanted to practice carrier take off (single mission - USN - F4U takeoff 1) and I can't seem to get the thing off no matter what. I don't remember having this problem before. In my opinion the carrier in the training mission seems a bit short. I'm having trouble taking off without ordnance and I don't even want to think what it would look like if I tried with ordnance. :confused: I'm attaching 2 of my attempts just so you get the picture of the problem and maybe tell me what's wrong. Thanks in advance. |
*Update.
I managed to take off with F4U-D variant, barely. Lowering fuel amount also helps with F4U-A. Still it seems strange I'm having so much trouble taking off the F4U-A with a full tank without ordnance. Any thoughts? |
I can take off with F4U-A with 100% fuel as well. Its close, but also AI cannot make it better. Didn't check your track, but did you use mixture 120%?
But indeed the CVEs are a bit short. Maybe we should change it. Not sure, if Corsairs ever started on light carriers... |
Thanks for the reply. In the training mission, the AI from the other carrier takes off but seems to be as close as half a meter from water at one point. I simply cannot hold the stick so perfectly still.
If someone has the time, please attach .trk of your take off in training mission "carrier take off 1" for the F4U-A with 100% fuel. |
Quote:
Probably should be changed... I can do that! :) |
Quote:
Aileron 6-8 notches right Rudder 6-8 notches right Elevator 25-30 notches up (!) This way it flyes off from itself, and only minimal stick input is needed after takeoff, but still it's a bit odd historically. |
During the war, Corsairs, Hellcats, even Spitfires, P-40s and P-47s were all flown off of CVE type carriers with full combat loads by average service pilots on several occasions without the aid of catapults. Taking off wasn't the problem; landing on a shorter, slower, more unstable CVE deck was a distinct problem.
By every account, the Wildcat was one of the hardest aircraft to take off from a carrier--the F4F-4 and FM-1 models were especially somewhat underpowered, and the darned things were so torque-y on top of those narrow landing gear that almost anything after that must have seemed like a piece of cake by comparison. Certainly, the late-war carrier fighters should have more than enough power and lift to clear even a short carrier deck easily with a normal combat load. I think that there's either something 'off' in the acceleration & takeoff modeling or that the 'correct' procedure for the Player to achieve the desired results is not well known or understood. cheers horseback |
Quote:
The Wildcat may have been a bit of a handful but it was still the aircraft of choice for these tiny pocket carriers. At the battle of Leyte Gulf it was a few Wildcats and Avengers from the CVE's of Taffy 3 that held back a much larger force. There was no Hellcat or Corsair employed from these carriers. |
I don't think F4U-s ever took off from CVE as it seems the corsair is much too heavy for such a short deck. I may not a best pilot tactically, but I know how to make smooth maneuvers with the plane, and it isn't helping.
The best I got with the 1A model is takeoff with 70% fuel. But I can take off from a moving carrier with the 1D every time without a hitch as its a bit more powerful. |
If any Corsairs launched from a CVE it would have been one of the larger ones for sure...
I'll modify the training missions and submit to TD for approval. Those missions were setup with, I think anyways, very little understanding of Pacific flight ops, and certainly CVE's wouldn't be used for Corsair flight training... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:24 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.