schauberger anitigravity engine undiscusible with a bit of imagination
 

you have a cannon and a cannonball attached to a cable attached to a spool

you shoot the cannonball 10 meters to your right

you let the spool give away as much cable as necesary as the cannonball flies

you let the SLIGHT friction of the spool apply a slight tension in the cable so the cannonball changes heading slowly

IMAGINATION tells you that the cannonball hardly will pull you but it will slowly change course

so you keep giving away cable for 180º and the next 180º you recover cable

so during 180º your giving away cable and during the other 180º you recover cable

dont you agree that our imagination tells us in 180º we wont be pulled by the cannonball and in the other 180º we will be pulled as hell?

this is just the concept that proves right nazi schauberger turbines and proves newton wrong

substitute the cannonball by particles of water and voila antigravity

if this is of any interest next what shape does this turbines ned to have and why they produce zero point energy, energy from space

Even for a thread from you this is hard to pentrate.

I get the bit where you've fired a cannon ball with a bit of string attached, what i dont get is why you're then tugging on it slightly. It will slow down and change course. So what?

How do you get from this to an anti gravity engine?

Make it as simple as you can please..

first 180º the cable will hardly pull on you

next 180º the cable will pull you a lot

why?

cause in one your giving away cable while in other youre recovering, outwards or inwards spiral made by the cannonball

you gotta visualize it traditional fisics say both halfs pull the same but even my physics teacher admited from this explanation you would got one pull bigger in one half than the other and therefore thrust :)

as a matter of fact i got a patent granted for a mechanical(instead of fluids) vortex engine like schaubergers but lost it for not paying the fees

edit:

a 40% probablity is gravity being produced by looping electrons like this so you can achieve this mecanically with fluids of directly on atoms making the electrons loop the loop:

if this guy looped the looped fast enoguh he would be propelled up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ox_UUc3xin4

Still don't get it.

Surley if you attach a cable to a spinning cannonball then all that will happen is the cable will wind around the ball?

thanks for your time really apreciate it :)

you use one of this and instead of fish a fast cannonaball:

http://www.photo-dictionary.com/phot...hing_spool.jpg

on the first 180º the cannonball makes a very open outwards spiral for your giving away cable, on the next 180º the opposite :)

stop trolling.

maybe im trolling

if trolling is to have a nice conversation world wide with the use of new tech on antigravity :)

natzis pay lot of attention to schauberger

its history he was taken to a prosoner camp to build his supposed antigravity turbines

I understand the spool part, what i dont understand is how the cable at the other end (cannonball end) doesn't just wrap it's self around the ball. It has to. If the ball is spinning. The ball is spinning?

thats a very good point, i hadnt thought about it, the cannonball could behave like a yoyo

but this is indifferent just neglect it

do you agree that when you give away cable it will pull less that when you recover cable though both paths are simetrical?

this is the crux of the antigravity concept and takes to electrons behaving like that and producing thrust at atomic level or gravity :)

Ok, i see now. The cannonball analogy threw me.

When it goes right down to sub-atomic it gets very wierd, who knows if the concept of anti-gravity is right. In fact there's no point thinking about it unless you're some sort of physics genius. It's too abstract. I'm better at dippy birds.