Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   VR tech at 350-400$ US (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=2709)

Zoom2136 02-12-2008 03:34 PM

VR tech at 350-400$ US
 
The iWearMonitor software is another component that monitors what games you are running and enables the head tracking driver as needed. The iWearMonitor currently only supports a handful of titles, although the ones supported are popular: World of Warcraft, Second Life, Half-Life 2 Deathmatch, Unreal Tournament 2004, Quake 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Lock On and IL2 Sturmovik.


Yep you can get a VR920 (includes head tracking) for 400$ or a AV920 (without headtracking) for 350$....

Read on here http://www.tomsgames.com/us/2008/02/12/vuzix_review/

Zoom2136 02-12-2008 03:36 PM

I think the best combination would ba an AV920 with a TrackIR4.....

Just my 2c

VT-51_Razor 02-13-2008 04:21 AM

What is the screen resolution Zoom??

bomath 02-13-2008 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VT-51_Razor (Post 35981)
What is the screen resolution Zoom??

Quote:

Originally Posted by TomsHardware
Each of the VR920's two screens-one for each eye-is a tiny 640x480 LCD panel. This was definitely my greatest reservation about the VR920. "How can anyone get an adequate gaming experience from a 640x480 display?" I wondered, before trying it. Yet, the first time I put on the VR920, the resolution astonished me in that it was much, much better than I envisioned 640x480 would be.

And no, TrackIR won't be necessary with this; it already has pitch/roll/yaw motion detection.

Rama 02-13-2008 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bomath (Post 35982)
And no, TrackIR won't be necessary with this; it already has pitch/roll/yaw motion detection.

It makes it 3-dof... not 6-dof. So not sufficient for the future flight-sims.

VT-51_Razor 02-14-2008 01:14 AM

Regardless of whether or not it is 6DoF, if the resolution were up to 1024x768, then this would be a great deal!! And as for the TrackIR, I would prefer to go with the cheaper price and use my TIR rather than spend the additional money for their tracking device. If the game you were in supported 6DoF, then the TrackIR would take care of that. After all, the screen in the helmet is going to show just what is being shown on the regular computer monitor, right?

Can you imagine wearing this device and just turning your head to look around without having to keep your eyes on the monitor?!!!

heloguy 02-14-2008 02:15 AM

I tried out one of these VR920's with my Track IR 3. It was definitely cool, but the feeling of sitting very far away from the screen, coupled with an extremely low resolution outweighed the fact that I didn't have to keep my eyes on the screen.

I played with it for about 30 minutes before I had to go back to my 22" monitor. The low res didn't allow me to see the aircraft very well, and after a bit I started to get a headache.

It's a cool idea, but would be better if it provided more of a surround visual sensation with a much higher resolution.

Zoom2136 02-14-2008 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bomath (Post 35982)
And no, TrackIR won't be necessary with this; it already has pitch/roll/yaw motion detection.

Yes but no zoom fonction....

Zoom2136 02-14-2008 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VT-51_Razor (Post 36044)
Regardless of whether or not it is 6DoF, if the resolution were up to 1024x768, then this would be a great deal!! And as for the TrackIR, I would prefer to go with the cheaper price and use my TIR rather than spend the additional money for their tracking device. If the game you were in supported 6DoF, then the TrackIR would take care of that. After all, the screen in the helmet is going to show just what is being shown on the regular computer monitor, right?

Can you imagine wearing this device and just turning your head to look around without having to keep your eyes on the monitor?!!!

It says that the resolution can scale up to 1024 x 768... but remember this is not a larger screen... and the reviewer all say that they were impress by the image quality. The only negative thing is its 16bit colors... which should be increase to 24 with a firmware update...

Zoom2136 02-14-2008 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heloguy (Post 36045)
I tried out one of these VR920's with my Track IR 3. It was definitely cool, but the feeling of sitting very far away from the screen, coupled with an extremely low resolution outweighed the fact that I didn't have to keep my eyes on the screen.

I played with it for about 30 minutes before I had to go back to my 22" monitor. The low res didn't allow me to see the aircraft very well, and after a bit I started to get a headache.

It's a cool idea, but would be better if it provided more of a surround visual sensation with a much higher resolution.


Well could very well be... but its a step in the right direction. If this thing can take off mayby their is hope for higher res VR tech at about the same $$$$. All in all... 350-400$ for such a gadget is not a lot of $$$. Because it replaces (the VR920) the monitor, TrackIR, headset and mic.. this thing could prove less expensive to someone on a budget.... even if its not 6dof


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.