Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Early/Late Torpedo Models. (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=17860)

ElAurens 12-29-2010 06:25 PM

Early/Late Torpedo Models.
 
Both US and Japanese torpedos apparently have an early and late version, yet my arming screens don't show both options.

Is this set by choosing the date in the MDS parameters in the FMB? And do we know the dates when the newer models are implemented?

Avimimus 12-30-2010 04:06 AM

Excellent question!

Zorin 12-30-2010 06:20 AM

Will we see new models for the Japanese and American torpedos in a future update?

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...type91mods.jpg

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...h_type91_3.jpg

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b...render_3-2.jpg

http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/b.../th_mk13_3.jpg

Zorin 12-30-2010 11:29 PM

Anyone? I would hand you the materials I used if that would be of help.

IceFire 12-31-2010 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zorin (Post 208253)
Anyone? I would hand you the materials I used if that would be of help.

You should e-mail them directly Zorin :) I'm sure as long as they are to spec they can be included. I noticed some lovely new SC50 bombs included in the patch. Not sure who did them but they look great compared to the old ones.

Zorin 12-31-2010 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceFire (Post 208273)
You should e-mail them directly Zorin :) I'm sure as long as they are to spec they can be included. I noticed some lovely new SC50 bombs included in the patch. Not sure who did them but they look great compared to the old ones.

They are not to spec, that is why I asked if they need my materials to build their own versions. Or in more general terms, if there is actually work being done on the Pacific scenario front. Cause even with the focus on the ETO, all we got in terms of loadout updates are the SC50/70s.

Zorin 01-06-2011 03:42 AM

I have lost theTD eMail. Any of you got it handy for me?

csThor 01-06-2011 06:29 AM

team.daidalos@gmail.com ;)

Cap'n Crunch 01-07-2011 04:59 AM

If you want a fairly in depth history of the USN Torpedo both air and sub versions, get a copy of John Kernan's "The Unknown Battle of Midway". Has a whole chapter devoted to the great torpedo scandal and the resulting cover up.

The new US data in game has it all wrong any way. The major difference in early to late is in the explosive composition and weight of explosives. It had to have some rear stabilizing fins added because it was heavier in the nose.

At the time of Midway, no pilot in the entire battle group had even dropped a dummy round. The survivors testified they'd never even seen an airplane take off a carrier with a simulated torpedo load. Basically no one knew how to drop one, and the tactical employment parameters were all wrong any way. Too slow and low were actually giving zero chance, the mechanisms were being damaged entering the water at the wrong angles. A study at CalTech in 43 finally figured this out and speeds and height were corrected for all models.

Any way, read the book, at least the chapter on torpedo's, a great read. These guys never had a chance, but went any way, the speed and altitude restrictions made them easy meat for ship and air gunners on the approach.

Throughout most of the war, the IJN didn't regarded air torpedo's as a serious threat. Wasn't the same other way around, the early US Yorktown style carriers were highly vulnerable. Only the Enterprise survived, it was the only one never hit by a torpedo. Now you know why the most famous USN ship was immediately scrapped after the war, it was a floating death trap.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.