Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Squadron Letters (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=17695)

philip.ed 12-18-2010 09:07 AM

Squadron Letters
 
Oleg,
looking at this weeks update, the squadron letters for 32 squadron don't look right: here are some pictures to compare ;)

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/attachm...4&d=1292598164


http://www.andysmodels.me.uk/models/...ne_GZB_001.jpg

I think the difference is clear. Is this something which can be changed? I know that in FMB you had modelled different camo schemes and similar things, but have you modelled different sizes for the squadron codes and the roundels?
Thanks in advance.

klem 12-18-2010 09:16 AM

Airfix? Well it's about right :)

http://www.raf.mod.uk/bob1940/29to46.html

http://www.rafweb.org/SqnMark032A.htm

and on my Hurricane Aces book

http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/185532597...PWYXT3TRPMRCN&

although the letters look unusually large compared with these
http://www.raf.mod.uk/bob1940/54to72.html
http://www.raf.mod.uk/bob1940/213to236.html

philip.ed 12-18-2010 09:39 AM

Yes, not the most credible example, but it looked accurate enough to me ;)
I checked it against my Hurricane Aces book, too, which matches period pictures very well. Unfortunately, googling for pictures didn't turn up any period ones which showed the codes fully :?
However, there are loads at the Hawkinge Battle of Britain museum, and they all show these oversized codes.

philip.ed 12-18-2010 01:38 PM

Just noticed that the underwing roundels on the picture that I posted are wrong, too. ;)

Biggs [CV] 12-18-2010 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 205216)
Yes, not the most credible example, but it looked accurate enough to me ;)
I checked it against my Hurricane Aces book, too, which matches period pictures very well. Unfortunately, googling for pictures didn't turn up any period ones which showed the codes fully :?
However, there are loads at the Hawkinge Battle of Britain museum, and they all show these oversized codes.

http://www.independent.co.uk/multime...40_428586s.jpg

http://images12.fotki.com/v217/photo...36/hur1-vi.jpg

http://www.tarrif.net/wwii/img/inter...d_wright_2.jpg

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/m...4_1462335c.jpg

http://www.tigerboys.com/images/hurri.jpg

Zorin 12-18-2010 01:54 PM

IF they use the same technique as they did with IL-2, duplicates of actual 3D model poligons, it highly depends on which poligons they chose to use.

Therefor what we seen in that screenshot might already be the extent of what is possible due to limits of the "poligon canvas".

philip.ed 12-18-2010 02:02 PM

I hope not, for a current sim that would be dissapointing, especially considering that a 5-year old sim (BoB2) was able to pretty much model every skin which appeared in the BoB.

kristorf 12-18-2010 06:58 PM

32 Sqn

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...-hurricane.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...nard-crash.jpg

philip.ed 12-18-2010 07:06 PM

Cheers Chris, never seen the second picture before, and it supports the other pictures, too ;)

Zorin 12-18-2010 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 205264)
I hope not, for a current sim that would be dissapointing, especially considering that a 5-year old sim (BoB2) was able to pretty much model every skin which appeared in the BoB.

The question is if BoB2 uses different skins for each plane or only certain areas. The IL-2 method has the advantage of reduced file size an it being independent from the skin file itself. Therefor I do belive it is a sound system.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.