Panther better then Tiger Unreal!
 

In Man of War is a tiger not so good as a panther and a Panther is expensiver as a tiger but in Reallity a tiger was more expensive than a Panther and better but in this game is the panther 70 points and tiger 62 lol!!!

Yeah thats funny.

In reality the Tiger had thicker armor but the Panther had the advantage of slooped armor which nearly doubled its armor. The Tiger had a 8.8cm KwK L/56 gun whilst the Panther had a 7.5 cm KwK L/70 gun, which had better penetration capabilites than the 8.8 cm KwK L/56. That´s why the Panther was kept in production and the Tiger I were retired, not to mention the fact that the Panther were more cost-effective to produce.

~Zeke.

yes but in reality the tiger tanke have more kills as the panther^^

Perhaps... however the two German "tanks" with most kills, were the STuG III Ausf. A-G and the not so much hyped, Pz.Kpfw. IV Ausf. A-H medium tanks.

And don´t forget that most Allied war reporters tended to name every knocked out German tank as a Tiger, or their own tank losses as "being knocked out by a Tiger". I´ve a book filled with pictures of German tank losses during the Normandy Campaign, and in every case where you see a Pz.Kpfw. IV/Panther wreck, the reporter has written "Yet another Tiger tank knocked out".

~Zeke.

Yes, and looks at the distance a Panzer IV / H similar, and even a tiger meistenst whom the Allies a Panzer IV / H saw they thought it would be a tiger!

Sources for that. Dont forget the Tiger has the psychological factor on its side. When it comes to numbes there have been far more Panthers in services compared to Tigers.