Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Hardware Loading IL-2/BoBSow? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=7671)

EZ1 05-22-2009 03:58 PM

Hardware Loading IL-2/BoBSow?
 
I am running with an I7 920 OCed to 3.4 GHz and a 285 GTX with 2 monitors. I run at IL-2 at 1920x1200. With this setup I can crank my game settings up pretty high. The game looks great and get frame rates around 50-60 (VSync ON) nearly 100% of the time. However, there is a case where my frame rate will drop to the lower teens every time. I just have to make a low pass over certain large cities. Good examples are the cities of Caen and La Havre on the Normandy map. I can buzz any other town or airfield on that map and not even see a blip in my frame rate. I can monitor my CPU usage on my second monitor and watch the bar for the core on which IL-2 is running go right to the top as my frame rate drops to the bottom when I buzz either of those cites. By the way, adjusting AA, or any other settings in the NCP has no effect on this--its all game controlled. So what is so different about those cities?

I'm not too concerned about this in IL-2 as I am rarely affected by this during online play.

So what about BoBSoW? It is supposed to have things like blowing fields grass and changing clouds. What kind of impact it that kind of thing going to have on our hardware setups?

SaQSoN 05-23-2009 07:53 PM

I'd estimate the difference as 70:1. ;) But it's purely my speculation. :grin:

Thunderbolt56 05-25-2009 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaQSoN (Post 77490)
I'd estimate the difference as 70:1. ;) But it's purely my speculation. :grin:


Wha? Translation please.

SaQSoN 06-01-2009 08:12 PM

Well, since people talk here mostly about IL-2 and BoB... :rolleyes: It should have been obvious, that I was talking about difference between IL-2 and BoB, replying to the last sentence of EZ1's post.

flyingbullseye 06-01-2009 08:18 PM

In all reality it should all come down to how well Oleg codes the sim. If he pulls a MS then don't expect to play it with all the bells and whistles for many many years to come, if he does what he did for the original sim I'm sure the OP will be fine by and large. Hopefully by this time next year we should be getting the system specs for it so until that time its all just speculation.

Flyingbullseye

Luffe 06-01-2009 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thunderbolt56 (Post 77657)
Wha? Translation please.

Ou-yay ow-knay at-whay o-tay o-day.

13th Hsqn Protos 06-02-2009 12:17 AM

'If' and 'when' the new engine ever gets released I think it is reasonable to expect much better performance on new hardware along with support for multi cpu.

I have a 940 AMD quadcore at 3.8 ghz on a 1066 bus with a 4850x2 crossfire mode.
12500 points in Vantage = still get into teens on some demos. Its game engine limitations.

The new engine is 'supposed' to be optimized. We shall see.

Its 'one' of the reasons that the game has been delayed so long. That and Oleg wants an MMO .......

Codex 06-02-2009 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13th Hsqn Protos (Post 78512)
...Its game engine limitations.
The new engine is 'supposed' to be optimized. We shall see.

Zinga!!! :cool:

Don't care if you've got a CPU and GFX card running at 6Ghz on a liquid nitrogen cooling system, if the code is not optimised you're going to get frames in the same range as the temperature of the coolant.

Igo kyu 06-02-2009 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codex (Post 78533)
Zinga!!! :cool:

Don't care if you've got a CPU and GFX card running at 6Ghz on a liquid nitrogen cooling system, if the code is not optimised you're going to get frames in the same range as the temperature of the coolant.

77 FPS would be fine for me. :)

Apparently, nitrogen is not an effective coolant:

Quote:

Despite its reputation, liquid nitrogen's efficiency as a coolant is limited by the fact that it boils immediately on contact with a warmer object, enveloping the object in insulating nitrogen gas.

K_Freddie 06-02-2009 05:45 PM

If you consider a boiling point of -195.79 °C or -320.3342 °F very hot.. then yes, I'd agree with that quote.

Not to mention that the surrounding gas temperature is not going to be that much higher.
;)

Igo kyu 06-02-2009 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K_Freddie (Post 78571)
If you consider a boiling point of -195.79 °C or -320.3342 °F very hot.. then yes, I'd agree with that quote.

Not to mention that the surrounding gas temperature is not going to be that much higher.
;)

I don't consider it hot.

However I was responding, jokingly, to the "framerate will be the same as the degrees" remark, the Kelvin temperature is 77 degrees, and 77 FPS is quite adequate on a 60 FPS monitor. :grin:


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.