![]() |
Cliff's of Dover will be updated by installing the sequel over it. yay!
Luthier said in dev questions: "The next time it will be updated is when you install the sequel over it."
Once updated with a final patch, Clod can be updated by installing the sequel over it, just like the updating of old :) Brilliant!, cheers, MP |
Quote:
|
Quote:
First released the official patch. It will be the last. Then the sequel and the new update. |
i dont believe that that would be too mean, i cant even start the game now due to launcher chrashes
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:grin: |
Launcher stopped working problem.
1 Attachment(s)
:razz:
Quote:
Having a rest from ROF Forum? Go to google Put in" Launcher stopped working on Cliffs of Dover" Then Visit Steam Forum Theres a thread on this problem. It will Tell you which Files to remove in Steam. I followed instrructions and i don,t get this problem any more. You will have to launch Steam before you start Clod But it all works perfectly now. :razz: |
All the naysayers will have to buy the sequel 8)
|
Well I will not be buying anything from these bunch of cowboys.To be disappointed repeatedly has left me with a sour taste in my mouth and being British I am absolutely disgusted with the way the Battle of Britain has been treated and this is the final straw.
That is all I have to say on the subject. |
Currently do not know, why so many of you ask that question, although it is clearly stated?!?!?!
There will be a patch soon for Clod! As already said, the sequel will be handled the same way as in il2 sturmovik! Means that they are compatible! But clod will not be updated alone anymore. Just one final patch and afterwards just updates over the sequel! Sorry, but I simply cannot understand, why this question is asked in 3 different threads today, after luthier stated roadmap!?!?!? Please just read before asking. :( |
Yay? Yay I have to pay more to fix what I already paid for.
Yay The many things that are still broken will not be fixed until 2014 (the sequel is not even alpha until 2013 guys) Yay???? |
Quote:
Others said that they were disillusioned with the whole development process and just wouldn't buy the sequal on principle! Others were just rude. They couldn't just go out and buy the sequel? Could they? Then we'ld have to put up with the rest of the series life with them saying how they were blackmailed into buying updates! Your statement sir, is rocking the faith I have in the integrity of my fellow man! ;) |
They announced that it would be merged with any sequels months ago. Why is this considered news?
|
Quote:
:) |
Yes, but when B6 was quizzed about the merging of the two recently, he said that he was not allowed to answer such questions. This, along with rumours of an MMO route, and the alleged 'June Announcement' served to suggest that the sequel could potentially be entirely separate.
It's nice to hear that it isn't. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Don't count your chickens until they are hatched, we've been told plenty of stuff that never happened.
|
Quote:
Or assuming that "I can't answer that question" means "we're changing everything"? Or parsing every word posted by a guy who barely speaks English? |
Well back on topic shall we?
It is good news this has been confirmed. Its the only way the series can have any hope of becoming stronger over time. I just prey this patch leaves us with something that is good enough to keep the online community alive until the sequel can bring the series back from the dead. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Regrading what needs fixing I see it from the complete opposite.. its the FMs that are the key to making CloD fun.. AA and other visual things can wait, these are superficial to the 'gameplay'. Anyway, no point discussing really.. there are many many important things the patch should cover, everyone has their own priority. |
I'm optimistic that I'll buy whatever came I'll buy sequels in collector edition if possible.
he said one patch and a sequel. that's good to know I need eastern front i'm not into BoB indeed kk besides, i understood that one patch and there won't be enough time to make another patch cause the sequel will be almost releasing so why not bother with Clod! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Luthier has admitted that cod is not up to par, which means he can do much better.
A fixed Clod + eastern front + several desastersoft and B6 campaigns ^^ , this game gonna be huge, while all the "world of thingy" will be long forgotten, the Il2 titan will rise again. I'am confident. Btw i'am also awaiting Rome II |
And once again, take your public spats to PM if you want to continue with them. Any more are O/T and will just get deleted, so don't bother.
|
Quote:
No Jaggies. There's probably some AMD/ATI equivalent available too. Sorry for OT Uther. ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
We've been told this for the past year. No surprise! |
Quote:
|
The way I read the latest from Luthier is the next shoe to drop will be the sequel AND THEN AND ONLY THEN will a final patch be released for CLoD...maybe.
If this is the case then exactly how do you install a "finished" sequel over an incomplete game that may or may not receive a last, final patch? :confused: |
Quote:
|
So are they at least going to provide CoD owners with patches to fix bugs (not content) without buying the sequel? Anything less would be a disgrace and very dishonest.
|
what!?, I purchased the game, and to work as it should, I have to buy the sequel?
|
Quote:
Have you tried to delete the conf.ini in the Library - Documents - 1C SoftClub - il-2 sturmovik cliffs of dover folder? The game will create a new one when started but save a copy just in case. |
Quote:
AA is not a bug fix. The situation regarding AA has been explained. If you'd rather criticize the company than use a well tried solution, fine. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you're really interested in a solution rather than simply complaining, see ATAG_Doc's post #10 in this thread here; http://theairtacticalassaultgroup.co...-driver-301-24 There are also some screenshots of mine in the thread, showing the cockpit and wing of a Spit with these settings. Edit: Where it says 'WRC 2010' in the control panel, it should of course say 'launcher.exe'. This was due to the Nvidia beta driver recognising the app wrongly. This is no longer the case with the official Nvidia v306.23 driver. |
Quote:
I still do not see why they cannot provide bug fixes for this broken software after the next patch without paying for them. That is really a dishonest business model. |
Quote:
As to bug fixes after the patch, maybe we'd better wait and see what they do fix in the patch, before complaining about what they don't. ;) |
Quote:
Building shadows shimmer too. That's not a matter of opinion. London all the shadows shimmer. As for the trees I have never seen that much vibrating shadows when I am airborne in RL. Its pretty bad looking. My opinion and many others too. I still do not see why they cannot provide bug fixes for this broken software after the next patch without paying for them. Its dishonest to force people to pay for bug fixes. |
Quote:
Have a go with the AA settings though. They really do work very well indeed. You will notice that the lettering in 'NetStats' is slightly blurred, but the settings clean up your picture dramatically. :) |
Quote:
Thanks I'm just waiting for my registration to clear over at ATAG as everything is on private for me right now and I can't get to the thread. |
I am going to repeat this for some you.
When IL2 Sturmovik was released version 1.0 there were problems. Things were alot simpler then because we were using 32mB video cards, and other much less sophisticated computer systems. Technology has seriously advanced since those days and graphic standards have gone into orbit compared to those days. Yes, IL2 had problems and the UbiSoft forums were a rage for over a year after IL2 was released. The devs were patching and releasing carefully, because the rage became unbearable with bad patches. Patches were just downloaded zip files and the process was simple for updating. The IL2 devs final solution to most of the problems with IL2 came in the Sequel "Forgotten Battles". It was a success, and we never looked back. Those of us that enjoy air combat flight simulation, a video making utility, a mission and campaign builder, online battles that catch the cheats,etc. We will have to bite the bullet and stay the term, which means after the next patch there will probably be issues... The sequel was how it was done before, and it looks like it will be the same this time as well. So, you are going to have to pony up some more money and buy the sequel. It isn't worth a complaint, because the majority of us would have gladly paid double the price of COD in the beginning. Be patient, and feel good. Luthier and the dev team are still striving to produce the air combat simulator application...that will be second to none. IMO, note I say in my opinioin. I would prefer the sequel not to update the previous COD version. I would prefer just like "Forgotten Battles" that it be a completely new release with everything from the COD included (not the bugs). Wash all that COD stuff behind us and move onto better things... Start anew with a completely competent and exciting new air combat flight sim application. |
yep second to none, not only because it will be the best, but also because, apart RoF, there will be nothing else in the sky
ED DCS-BS2 is just the same (20$ for an update, strangely no one is arguing about that) Microsoft Flight project has already gone sour See you later angry alligator ^^ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
By the time (if they dont go under due to lack of funding), 1C makes this playable, you dont know if there will be competition from a another dev that knows to make a sim or not. |
Quote:
Now if they'd just include a flyable Wellington and/or Beaufighter in the sequel in additon to the Eastern Front models and some snowy landscape...........;) |
Quote:
There were A20's at least right? |
I suspect there will definitely be snowy landscape, if the sequel will be what we are expecting "Moscow".
Personally, I like the mountains of the Crimea and Kuban regions on the Black sea. |
Quote:
Fantastic idea, if I say so myself, and I commend it to the House. :) Edit: Nearmiss, I reckon we'll be getting Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad. Or at least, maps representing the three main thrusts of Barbarossa. I also hope we do. We already know the Stalingrad part...... |
Quote:
Sokol1 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I totally 100% agree. And a bit more :grin: Best Regards, MB_Avro |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Did you click the 'add' button in the control panel, then follow the file path to 'launcher.exe' in program files, so the control panel knows you're customizing settings for that particular programme? Then clicked 'apply'? Sorry if this sounds patronising, but I'm just checking. :) |
Quote:
GTX 580 3gb newest drivers Tried all AA settings in game including off with these settings. Even tried video inspector and no go. Res 2650 x 1600 Which in most games removes most of the AA by itself. If I lower the res it is hideous. No you are not patronizing, just trying to help and thank you. And yes I did all those things. The only thing that has made any difference at all is the InjectSMAA. It makes only a very minor difference though, like going from 0 AA to 2x AA. Noticeable but very small. And the landscape still shimmers badly over cities. |
Hmmm, well I can't think of anything else to suggest. Certainly the settings clean up the aircraft, whether on your own or in formation with others. Maybe the shimmering landscape is something you're noticing because of screen size. Mines only a 1920x1080 24 inch, so if yours is bigger, which I assume it is with that res, the size of the monitor is exaggerating something I don't see.
I haven't even noticed whether any shimmering or flickering is reduced with these settings, as it didn't bother me too much in the first place, but ATAG_Deacon, who runs a three screen wrap around set up lowers his resolution. He posted a short vid of his set-up on the ATAG forum. I'll see if I can find the link for you and edit this post. Edit: Sorry, the vid I was after is in the 'member's only section'. Anyone else help with this kind of res? |
Quote:
I wonder if you have hit on something, which would explain why some complain about this and some don't. I wonder if some are more used to more jaggies and a bit more is not as noticeable to them, whereas others are used to clean and clear image that other sims can manage and thus notice the jaggies much more. I dunno, all I can think of, but the videocard settings do absolutely nothing in my case which is really puzzling since they work for you. |
This is great news! More options is always better!
|
yeah it sucks that this game was left hanging. I had thought that they would keep patching away at Clod, while working towards the sequel .
But it does make sense of what the devs are doing. The engine is broke, and once the devs fix the engine (for the sequel), they can use that to fix Clod . .. However I think they might be either redesigning the game engine again, or doing major work on it. Also as Luthier said, there's that funding issue. Once they have the working engine, they can adjust the content for Clod to the new engine and, whut up! working game. However the sequel should have a working game engine with bells and whistles (weather etc) and the titular plane . . . When we have this sequel, I guess installing it will simply patch CloD to match what the sequel has (generally bug free, weather, etc). But they are focusing on continuing the Il-2 series. its funny how some misread luthier's post and said the sequel is incompatible with Clod. . . |
Just curios as to why people think the "sequal" will be any good? As if it is a golden nugget of programming or somehting?
These guys cant get CLoD right, and the BoM is going ot be using the same engine, that has been a mess for over a year now. Do people realize they failed at CLoD? If they have no been able to get this mess correct, how are they going to do it with BoM? If they can get BoM right, then why have they not done it with CLoD? See the loop here? Its called they need more money because they relased a turd, and now want to make people pay to fix what they already bought. They have failed. Failed in programming, failed in any decent offline, failed in communication, failed in optimization, failed in customer santisfaction, and totally failed in trust. They did that to themselves, nobody else. |
You could be right if they don't bother fixing the game engine while building the Sequel. I assume one half of the crew will be working on the Sequels, maps, aircraft, and missions will the other half works on the AI, AI Commands, FM, DM, GUI, Clouds/Weather which should apply equally with COD, the next Sequel, and the Sequels after that. They have a year or two before the Sequels release and we should have a better idea after the release of the RC patch, how many issues they will still have to fix. We all know it will probably be a very long list. I wish them luck. I'd sure like to see a number of quality years of new theaters, and features, like the original series.
|
Quote:
Even with all the problems it would still be work every cent. Hopefully they will sort out some of the issues and it will be even more value. |
ill be buying this comunity is too nice not to support it
and theyre not rich people still rmember the day oleg ask the comunity plz money for a new car |
Quote:
I understand the logic of the turd analogy, but I am more inclined to think CoD/BoM is a gem covered by turd. Despite the many issues with CoD, Some are playing it quite nicely. My PC is way below spec so I can't complain or compare my experience with others, but the times I've played have been fun enough to give them the chance to pull the flecks of turd off the game and polish it up. I'll look with a more askance view, and I won't gloss over perceived shenanigans, but I'll be fair. |
Quote:
|
Not sure about this diamond-in-the-rough or gem-in-a-turd analogy.
The core qualities are fairly clear. The only hope lies in external qualities and work, add-ons, user involvement etc. Everything suggests the underlying code base is fairly inept...with a few supporters hoping they can make it more ept. Talking of perceived shenanigans...the mods seem to be playing whack-a-mole lately with dissenting threads. The problem with that is, the voices just emerge in other threads...it doesn't go away. Might as well leave one or two buildings standing so people know what to expect. Put us in one place, so to speak. |
Quote:
|
Big turning point
I wont buy the sequel ,at first , ill wait till it drops down in price, learnt my lesson , i dont even fly cliffs of dover,much , in fact its pushed me away to other sims , IL-2 HSFX 6.15 (online awsome) - ect - DCSworld , i waited so long for this . i find it very frustrating ..lol..
.i am to british , and disapointed, The Battle of Britain , big turning point in history , Dam Shame....:confused: confused what happend ... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh well, maybe after the sequel... |
I went online with my squad , in il-2 HSFX 6.15 the other night , can you believe 80 players were flying the Crete mission with the online war , and not one flaw in the server , fantastic , stuff,
|
I cant even start the game now due to launcher chrashes
http://www.qmku.info/0.jpghttp://www.qmku.info/7.jpghttp://www.qmku.info/8.jpghttp://www.qmku.info/9.jpghttp://www.ymeu.info/test5.jpg |
Quote:
|
buying BoM to fix CLoD
Hello
If I understand this correctly, the new BoM will install over CLoD and will address the problems that still plague some CLoD owners. Two months ago I eagerly purchased CLoD and paid full retail (I have a system that meets CLoDs requirements). Pardon my frustration but I have not been able to fly CLoD more than 3 minutes before the launcher crashes. I have been back and forth with tech help for the last month, tried four re-installs, driver updates, cache validations and and other things, still with no success. Am I to assume that BoM will make my CLod usable? Am I supposed to pay full retail for a new product because that is the only way I might be able to use a product that I have already paid full retail for? Whatever is done in BoM that addresses CLoDs launcher issues should be made available as a patch for CLoD owners. If that can't happen, then CLoD owners get BoM free. I have no more reason to assume that this would work than I had that CLoD would work for me so I can hardly be expected to fork over more cash to the same folks that sold me a product that has yet to function for me. :confused |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
CloD is buggy but not that buggy that it crashes every 3 minutes. Countless bugs have been adressed, and I doubt they could be discovered only after 3 minutes of playing. Try to contact the one who sold you the game. BTW, if your computer barely meets the minimal requirements, do not expect it to be able to run the game. That is the painfull lesson for many of us. |
HI Thanks for the reply.
I paid about 30 dollars for it on steam, which is their retail price. Steam claims its not them (and their other games work well for me) and as I said, I have been going back and forth with CLoD technical support for a month. I was never told about the "release candidates" patches by the tech I was dealing with and I am downloading it now to see if that helps. I have 4 megs ram, a gtx 560 with a gig onboard, aN AMD Athlon X4 630 cpu, saitek evo joystick and I run XP service pack 3 |
I think you really need Windows 7 as XP et al seem to be a bit problematical. And 8 dosen't work apparently. I recently took a risk and got a copy from someone called micropal who sells them on ebay. It was posted from China and came in a piece of cardboard but with the genuine sticker with activation code attached. It installed ok with automatic online registration enabled and has not had a problem so far although I wont feel entirely out of the woods until the 30 days are up. But for £48.50 postage free for Ultimate I thought it might just be worth it. Buyer beware.
|
I think he meant that there will be a final patch and then after that there will only be updates to CloD if you buy the sequel.
http://www.rdox.info/01.jpghttp://www.rdox.info/02.jpghttp://www.rdox.info/8.jpghttp://www.rdox.info/9.jpg http://www.rdox.info/0.jpg |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.