an advice for those who cant run the game at good fps
 

in the conf. ini you can set resolution at 640*480 or 600 *800

heres myself playing multiplayer at 80 fps 640*480

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/80fps.jpg

i would say my eye cant tell 800*600 than 2000*2000 at certain distance

yes im miope

Clod for gameboy? nice

i think tghe only game i ever played at a higher res than 640*480 its counterstrike

for me the fun its the competition and there performance is key, i prefer 80 bad looking fps than 30 good looking ones

edit:

also rememebr to run it at full screen in the conf,ini

but what's the point in owning Cliffs of Dover then? why bother owning anything better than a win 95 machine...........it is your own oppinion that trackir is a decadent luxury because people are starving.........you do realise that using the internet is contributing to global warming because you are using electricity.

"but what's the point in owning Cliffs of Dover then?"

i bought it with the exclusive intend to support a comunity that has been nice with me whre most havent

the same reason why i made this post :)

edit:

"why bother owning anything better than a win 95 machine"

do you mean the fastest system ever?

do you really think new is neccesarily better?

Running the game in 800x600 on a 24" monitor is something I'll do after the Jotunheim mountains fall, Pigs have successfully flown in orbit around Mars and there's a lasting peace in the middle east. In that order.

Your suggestion is about as useful as a wet sock is in an oilrig-fire.

something doesn't add up there.....why would anybody not be nice to you? are you a different character in these other communities?

I know I'm going to get myself targeted as a mean old bully by criticising you again Raaaid but the very thin veil you wear of a simple and good spirited community minded character doesn't fool me....and I imagine that's what happened in other forums.

Yes new is better.......because the tech advances.......how is it you need that explaining?

miope no es en ingles miope xDDDD
Sorry 4 using spanish ;)
I play at 1920x1200 and I wont change it for anything

i use the internet anonimity to be myself which can afford in real life

in real life it would be something like this:

http://www.lfsforum.net/search.php?s...5&pp=25&page=2

im lerts there thats some of the worse bullying i exprerimented on forums :(

Who are you exactly raaaid? You're a remarkable individual you know.

Like fjordmonkey says though, it'll be ragnarok before I play clod on that resolution.

In the future, when my wristwatch has enough processing power and it's own screen, I wouldn't fly it in that resolution.

Speaking of competition, how can you see the important details at that resolution!? Can you even see your own bullets? :P

Well from what I can see I am not unique in my perception of you as a character, so you say you rely on your annonimity, that in itself has some sinister undertones, it reeks of a form of dishonesty and hypocricy .......'annonimity to be myself' just doesn't make sense.

p.s. with regards to your nostril theory.....I had you down as a mouth breather.

yes crazyness is hunted nowadays as homsexuallyty was hunted before

saying a murderer is an schizophrenic is in fact as biased(according most studies and statistics) as saying the murderer was an homosexual

im proud to be crazy but cant show off in real life

but as in the net im anonimous i can be my crazy self which makes me happy :)

I love diversity. Raaid is one of a kind on this forum. From what I see he does no harm, rather the opposite. I'd prefer his company over many other boooring ex-military, stiffneck, hardcore, true-to reality, "build-a-pit-in-the-basement" nerds that know every little technical detail about the planes! ;-)
But I love you too!:grin:

Lowering the resolution is a great way to gain a shitload of frames. However, I run at native 2560 x 1440 and tried to lower to 1920 but it hurt my eyes so this is not for me.:-P

Btw, we all make use of anonymity more or less.

So you admit all of your posts are just crazy ramblings and are of no use to anyone but yourself because 'you need' to spew out this pshychobabble.

What's the use of this post? Go build a pit or sum.

dali was crazy tesla was crazy giordano bruno was crazy most poets are crazy

hartman had two nervous breakdowns

does that make any less of them?

The use?.......it was a response in a conversation between me and Raaaid, don't recall asking for your oppinion.

Hitler, Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, Peter Sutcliffe, Mark david Chapman..........and many many other nutjobs who were crazy and didn't contribute so well to society, it is a very weak argument to try and justify ones own mental state by comparing to others, after all the list you and I produced all had a major impact on the world and society, you on the other hand are just going from forum to forum and spouting crap, I am pleased for you that you do seem to have some 'fans' and I don't bear any real malice to you either.

no hitlwer was not crazy he was plain bad

people asociate crazyness with badness, thats a huge lie

i admit to be crazy but i try to be as virtuous as poibly can

you know the enlightenement stuff thats what im for

You want to be enlightened or you are trying to enlighten the rest of us?

Hitler was bad? what do you mean? like Osama Bin Laden bad?.......Enlightening!

im not schizophrenic just slightly delusional but a quick google will move you from your mistake:









One of the lasting legacies of the historical movement to institutionalize mental patients is the idea that they are in need of being segregated from society because they pose a danger to society. Today, when schizophrenia is mentioned in the news, it is almost always in connection with some alarming crime. Some stories that have been popular in the media and which have added to the public view that schizophrenics are violent and dangerous include the case of Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in a bout of postpartum psychosis, David Berkowitz, the serial killer infamously known as the Son of Sam who claimed his dog spoke to him and urged him to kill, Mark David Chapman, the man who killed Beatle John Lennon, and John Hinckley, who attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan.

Advertisement


While there are certainly violent and murderous people who have schizophrenia and related mental illnesses, such individuals make up only a very small portion of the population of chronically mentally ill people. The vast majority of mentally ill people, including schizophrenic people, are non-violent people who never cause problems of this sort. Large population studies that have examined the relationship between violence and mental illness have shown at best a small relationship between mental illness and violence exists.

edit:

and yes hitler was bad unlike me and sane unlike me

Just remind me where I said 'schizophrenic', I didn't even claim you are violent, I only made a list of people with the condition and gave my reasoning, I hate to break this to you but you probably won't achieve any of the greatness of the people you mentioned by making random and pointless posts on gaming forums.......probably........but I will be the first to concede if it ever happens.

Hear, hear... :cool:

we are the people of the internet and together we are shaping the future :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxZZ6...eature=related

raaaid is a decent person and never offended anyone, so be so polite to use the same courtesy to him.

Sooooo...........the internet is the meaning of life?...........it's all so clear now, because being white and pasty from lack of sunlight with barely any physical presence let alone any form of androgeny is what the human race has really aspired to be all along........

This thread is sooooo off topic...