For Adonys
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-2w6...layer_embedded

Should reassure you about 1C's good faith :grin:,,,And remember...This IS the version EVERYONE gets worldwide+ upcoming patches...

SAlute!

Bloody Hell!!

Thanks for the video Kalimba, but I'd just like to warn everyone that sound starts at ~20second mark on this - loud with gunfire.

Turned my sound up, then got damn near deafened!! :evil::o:o

Apart from that very nice.:)

This is looking beautiful! Very similarspec to my PC, cannot wait for Thursday :)

WOW!! Good Stuff!!

You guys are hilarious...this is exactly what the game looks like in the russian version WITH the filter on...

that prop motion in the beginning of the vid is what it looks like throttled back.

Which means that the one we'll get will be both better looking and yet slightly better running.
If the team can hunt down the problems behind the freezes we're in for some fun.

Too late!

There should be a filter for antideafening on youtube :D

But seriously all of you anti epilepsy filter guys? Have any of you been flying a single engine prop plane IRL? You DON'T see the prop like that. Period. That effect really should be possible to turn off for us that want a realistic view and no WoP style "game" ;)

You see a slight vague haze, but not more than that. The effect shown here is a camera effect caused buy the camera taking a quick succession of stills for heavens sake! If we are going to have this then bring on the Star Wars lasers too for the tracers, or make them wobble like in WoP simulating a vibrating camera :)

The only plane in this game I've flown IRL is the Moth, but I can confirm that you see almost nothing of the prop while flying in that one either :)

yeah guys^^

there's a reason they paint the tip yellow, it's so that you can see that theres a spinning prop there. Trust me, I work with aircraft. Have also flown cessna 172 and can confirm that the only prop I saw during flight was the one on my cellphone cam corder.

really? there you go, have a look. at some point, the camera is looking from inside the cockpit exactly how a pilot would look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM2-PoD-SgU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiU3VpP2VhU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQxb-V-rZqA

that is an artifact of the filming, just like wagon wheels going backwards in a western

Well, Adonys, for someone who gets angry cause we don't get your point, it seems you don't get this fact: What you see in your videos are camera issues...with prop rotations...You don't trust real pilots on this forum ?
How can you be sure that what we see on film is the same as real life ?
Have you flown in a real prop plane ? Some here have and they assure us that we are not supposed to see much more than a faint glare..
So, who's right?

Salute !

Whether or not you see props in a video (or still shot) depends on the exposure length. Longer exposure means no props. Depending on the rpms the props become a full disc at around 1/60.

http://www.aero-pix.com/westfield10/...es/img_014.jpg

it is not just a camera optical illusion, it appears the same to the eye too, and indeed the way it appears depends on the rpm. I haven't seen them on real airplanes, yet I have seen them on plenty of real helicopters. the same effect actually can be seen on any rotating blades (propellers, car wheels protection plastics, old trains spiked wheels, etc).

where are real pilots flying single engine aircrafts (and not flying them just once), to answer this?

ps: and I'm not angry at all, just letting you know.

I just did on the previous page. Like I've said, you hardly see anything of the prop in most cases, and I have flown at least 20 different single engine prop aircraft, among them the Tiger Moth that is in the game. I have also flown the Yak-52 and it's the same with that one (quite similar to a WWII plane even though it's a lot lighter and has a weaker engine - but it is a radial at least ;)).

EDIT: And as I just fly for fun when getting the time I don't have more than ~400 hours, but that is a lot more than "once" at least ;)

i have flown a trainer prop plane, and didnt see any prop. apart from when engine was off of course :)

You just can't randomly choose video or still images to show what it looks like in real life, it's pointless. It does not appear the same to the eye. That's not to say that you can't get a video camera with the appropriate shutter speed to give a similar image to that of the human eye, but if you're just taking random examples they will be different.

Ok...Sorry if I said angry...Intense would be more accurate...;)

But there you go..2 pilots...Same conclusions...

Salute !

I'm a private pilot IRL, if we would have the prop visible like that it would be hard flying VFR. ;)

That would be a real safety issue obscuring my view forward.

It looks just like that in the russian version with filter off and throttle idle. At high rpm and the sun low at 6'o clock you see a thin yellow arc from the props tip.

You can see the prop BECAUSE THAT WAS TAKEN WITH A CAMERA.

I've flown in single engine prop planes multiple times, in multiple kinds of aircraft, you can't see the prop in any of them.

Okay here to reiterate what the others have stated regarding the "Camera" side.

Take this video, it shows extreme cases of a camera modifying what we would see in real time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgvuQGY946g

The camera shutter speed is approximately in sync with the revolution of the prop, therefore the blades appear to stay stationary in the video. The same can be applied to the video you posted, its a trick of the camera that has you fooled.

Adonys, you are wrong here. as simple as that.

We should take you one day to the airfield and put you to watch the 2 bladed motodelta for an hour while you play with the throtle till you get convinced. Ofcourse you pay the gas used :D.

BTW... being wrong is not a pleasure thing for morale but standing corrected is.

Dense would be more more appropriate.

The "example by camera" is so laughable that it becomes pathetic. Especially since adonys repeated it several times already.

Vevster and the others alike, people not knowing to have a civilized contradictory discussion, you're out of the lines with your comments. If there's anything laughable around here, are the comments made by people like you, and those people themselves.

Stating things you just "know" as facts without really trying to look into them, and understand them, it is a sign of sheer stupidity.

HERE. have a look. It is the section called "Wagon-wheel effect under continuous illumination". And you can have another one here, here and here. Wikipedia is not the mother of all knowledge, and not even everything presented on it is it as it is presented in there, but it is a good place from which to start your looking into gaining new knowledge.

Human eye and vision mechanisms are not a thing we understand completely yet. Even more, people have different sensitivities when it comes to what they see (I'm sure all of you know instances when some people were saying they see a flicker, while some don't related with 60 Hz CRT monitors).

The effect we've discussed in here is not only seen on camera images.

Are you trying to tell me that none of you actually saw this effect in real life, with their own eyes, while looking at the turning wheel cover's of the thousands of cars around you?!! If you haven't, try to pay a little attention next time, specially to the ones not firmly fixed (as in allowed of an independent rotation move) to the wheels.

Instead trying to check first, and try to learn new things and enlarge your knowledge, you jump directly at barking and biting, which is a stupid behavior.

Even more, you've turned this thread into something which it actually ain't: this thread it is NOT about the propeller arc effect, be it missing/crippled or not (and btw, why were you not jumping at MG's throat for actually adding an effect like that into the game, if it is not what your eyes are seeing?). it is about ALL the effects removed/modified forever from the game before adding the anti-epilepsy filter.

Stop being stupid, and attack in wolfpacks without really knowing why you're aggressive in the first place.

At last you are able, to see yourself in the mirror....

You've been telling us on several threads that the effects are wrong, that is not what is seen by the eyes of a pilot etc... and as a proof, you bring us camera footage when people tell you a amera doesn't necessarily work as the human eye. Depends on shutter speed.

I've flown in planes with propellers, a T-26, a Steaman PT-17 and some modern planes like cessnas, what you see in front of you is not what you describe.

A turning wheel on a car is quite different than a propeller. Please look at these two different objects when they are not in motion, just to be sure....

You must be really mental challenged to not understand what I've said at the beginning of that thread.

Here, a full quote just for you:

I was not telling that the effects are wrong, I was just telling that LUTHIER SAID that they had to modify some effects (ie change them from how they initially implemented them in the way they thought they should really be) in order to meet UBI's anti-epilepsy requirements. And I was telling that UBI saying they'll remove the anti-epilepsy filter IT IS NOT THE SAME as also putting back those effects the way they initially were.

It's really funny to see how people are wrongly understanding something and distorting your words, and then accuse you of something you have nothing to do with.

Really funny..

Yup, funny:

Really funny indeed

You already forgot what you wrote?


You haven't seen it yourself, many here told you what they saw when flying, but you keep on bringing camera footage and car wheels....

You are not right, I've asked at some point where are the real pilots to say from their own experience about this, and after some posted, I don't remember me continuing to insist on that matter.

And even so, they might be wrong. They might have been accustomed with it, and not really seeing it anymore. There were also other pilots saying that it can be observed in certain conditions.

I'm sure it's a much more complex problem to only be answered with a simple yes/no.

And why would not the wheel covers effect be the same? when on wiki is clearly put in the same category named "wagon wheel effect", together with the propellers and some other examples?

Thing is, some people might be more sensitive to it than others.

And more, I am saying that I saw the effect with my own eyes on car wheel covers and helicopter propellers. Have you not seen this effect with your own eyes while paying attention to it while in a plane cockpit, or looking at an aircraft/helicopter propeller? And if not, why are you here to argue about this?

PS: it quite funny to see your "A turning wheel on a car is quite different than a propeller. Please look at these two different objects when they are not in motion, just to be sure...." statement. And I'm pretty sure you're not so stupid as, while they are not the same objects indeed (and no one claimed they were), in to not see the similarity of those same named objects..

And this stops here, I do not wish to continue a stupid argument with some who it's obviously too thick to have a decent argument. Have a nice day, mr. Vevster and adieu and welcome to my ignore list. Feel free to do the same with me.

I have an old 1950's electric fan, three narrow blades, white plastic. I've switched it on and off a couple of times, not once did I see the effect of 3 three distinct blades rotating in the haze. You see the haze, or you see the blades when spinning down.

Then I did it again looking through my digital camera. Yes, now I did see the effect, on the screen.

Conclusion: No prop visible in real life. Anyone with a fan and a cam can do this experiment.

Some people are so limited that they dont allow reality to influence their point of view!

There is a saying related to einstein about the only two things that are limitless in this universe, but he was not shure in one instance.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”

Of course!, someone had to spell it out! :-D

I saw what you where doing and thought of a way to increase my post count :)