Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   What operating system to use with a new rig? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=19346)

timholt 03-22-2011 01:59 AM

What operating system to use with a new rig?
 
I am getting a new rig made to use with RoF and IL2 - Cliffs of Dover.
Should I:

stick with XP

Get 32 bit System 7 or

Get 64 bit System 7?

I am 64 years old and will not understand technical answers but the guy putting it together needs to know.

jimbop 03-22-2011 02:12 AM

Windows 7 64-bit.

First, definitely 64-bit to allow for >4GB RAM usage. Second, Windows XP support is ceasing (has ceased?) so I'd go with the current version (7) if I were you. Finally, DirectX10 and 11 do not work with XP so you will not get the best graphics features into the future if you stick with XP. I have Windows 7 64-bit and have found it quite stable and easy to work with.

ATAG_Doc 03-22-2011 02:50 AM

I use win 7 64bit. ssd drives. 12 gb ram. 3 gtx 480 sli and water cooling using a dual loop.

IceFire 03-22-2011 03:01 AM

If it's Windows 7 then 64bit is the only way to go (why bother with 32bit?). There's virtually no downside to Win7 64bit except if you run 16bit legacy software which has legacy support on 32bit Windows but not on 64bit versions.

Honestly this is true for maybe a small number of people.

Windows XP... it's core foundation is a decade old. It's most recent major update is maybe half a decade old. Not worth it in my mind. Support on new hardware/software is beginning to wane despite it's immense popularity.

timholt 03-22-2011 03:41 AM

Thanks troops, Sys 7 64 bit it is.

Heliocon 03-22-2011 04:32 AM

Everyone beat me to it, but ya Win7 64bit is a very good OS and is also easy to use. At the moment its really the only sane choice.
-Try to get the professional version, not home or home premium (they cap the ram to 16gb) vs 256gb for professional (or 128? either way you would need alot of ram sticks :) !

PeterPanPan 03-22-2011 07:10 AM

I have just bought a dual boot system. XP to run older software that might not run properly in W7 and W7 64 bit for all newer software ... including of course CoD.

Sven 03-22-2011 07:55 AM

Just upgraded from XP to Win7 64Bit myself, I like it so far, and the extra memory comes in handy.

timholt 03-22-2011 08:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sven (Post 237185)
Just upgraded from XP to Win7 64Bit myself, I like it so far, and the extra memory comes in handy.

No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

No601_Merlin 03-22-2011 09:27 AM

Just made the switch from XP to Win 7 Pro 64 only issue I had was having to change from using CH control software version 3.6 to version 4.51 and having to change the settings on a couple of throttle controls.

Got Win 7 64 bit to have 8GB memory seen.

kendo65 03-22-2011 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237194)
No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

I'm currently using it with CH Combat stick, Pro throttle and Simped rudder pedals. No problems with any of those - indeed very strightforward generally with drivers and installations.

Just built a new rig myself and everything went much more smoothly than my first XP build.

svanen 03-22-2011 09:49 AM

Windows 7 64-bit and get a fast SSD for the os and application/games you use alot, like CoD and RoF. :)

I have got so used with SSD that I cannot use a computer with a mechanical harddrive anymore.. ;)

JG52Krupi 03-22-2011 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by svanen (Post 237223)
Windows 7 64-bit and get a fast SSD for the os and application/games you use alot, like CoD and RoF. :)

I have got so used with SSD that I cannot use a computer with a mechanical harddrive anymore.. ;)

What size SSD do you use?

Watch out for steam as it can only install to one drive, ATM my steam folder is too large to have it on my SSD :(

svanen 03-22-2011 10:20 AM

@JG52Krupi: That is a good point, no problem for me but perhaps for others in your situation. There is a 600gb Intel SSD coming, but I think that one will cost a fortune, ~1000€...

Revvin 03-22-2011 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237194)
No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

So long as the rudders and joystick are USB and not the gameport type you'll be fine. Windows 7 dropped support for gameports.

F19_lacrits 03-22-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi (Post 237226)
What size SSD do you use?

Watch out for steam as it can only install to one drive, ATM my steam folder is too large to have it on my SSD :(

You should get as much volume as your wallet can afford you. The larger the SSD the better it performs. But, for a minimum I would not go under 64/80GB since you want to have your OS and favorit applications on it.

brando 03-22-2011 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237194)
No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

I find TrackIR works very well in Win7x64bit. I'm using the ver.5 software with no problems.

HOTAS works fine too using latest s/ware (4.51)

I am using two SSDs now, both 60GB capacity, FB & RoF on one - OS and apps on the other.

I love SSD. Not only faster and quieter, but with imaginative use of velcro you can plant them anywhere in your case so long as the leads reach ;)

Yammo 03-22-2011 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237194)
No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

Logitech G940 had a blue-screen issue a year ago, but runs 5-by-5 with the
latest software.

Sven 03-22-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237194)
No trouble accepting rudder pedals, joystick, throttle and track IR?

Do not have TrackIR, but no trouble at all with the rudder, joystick and throttle, Logitech G940 here.

Let me say this: I installed win7 64 Bit in the morning (upgrading from XP 32bit), got my system running fully updated with all the drivers I need, and in the evening I was already flying IL2 with my team mates;)

Heliocon 03-22-2011 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PeterPanPan (Post 237181)
I have just bought a dual boot system. XP to run older software that might not run properly in W7 and W7 64 bit for all newer software ... including of course CoD.

Dont need to do that. Win 7 has a "compatibility mode" which allows you to run software thats only compatible with older versions of windows. So I can choose to launch the software in compatibility mode for XP sp2 - and it emulates it. No need for dual boot :grin:

Heliocon 03-22-2011 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi (Post 237226)
What size SSD do you use?

Watch out for steam as it can only install to one drive, ATM my steam folder is too large to have it on my SSD :(

You could buy a raptor, they are cheaper then SSDs atm.

timholt 03-22-2011 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 237462)
You could buy a raptor, they are cheaper then SSDs atm.

Can you explain raptor and SSD please?

Les 03-22-2011 10:15 PM

Raptor is a brand name for a fast hard-drive made by the Western Digital company. SSD stands for Solid State Drive.

Raptors, like all conventional (non-SSD) hard-drives, store their information on magnetic disks that spin inside them. The faster they spin the better, as it means information can be read from them and written to them quicker. The benefit of that is you don't have to wait so long for programs (including Windows itself) to load up and start, and anything you want your computer to do that requires accessing the hard-drive will be done quicker. Western Digital Raptors (or Velociraptors as they are also known) are the fastest, affordable, conventional hard-drives readily available to consumers.

SSD's are hard-drives that have no moving parts, using instead large amounts of what is called 'flash' memory, which is similar to the kind of memory that's used in removable SD Cards and the USB Flash Drives or 'memory sticks' that you might be familiar with. SSD's are much faster than even the fastest conventional disk-based hard-drive, and much smaller, quieter and cooler too. They're more expensive though, and more limited in the amount of data they can store. SSD's, or something similar to them, will probably replace conventional hard-drives altogether once their storage capacities go up and their prices come down.

At the moment, SSD's are now generally considered to be affordable enough, and to have a high enough storage capacity, to be a good substitute for the conventional hard-drives that you would usually put your operating system and other often-used programs on. A lot of people are still using a combination of SSD's and conventional hard-drives though, in order to still store larger amounts of data, that they don't access as often, on the higher capacity conventional drives.

Hope that makes sense. Getting an SSD for your operating system and often-used programs is something worth considering, but not absolutely essential (though if you do get one you'll probably never go back to conventional hard-drives).

timholt 03-22-2011 10:42 PM

Thanks Les, I really appreciate your time spent on lengthy informative replies. I have been playing IL2 since it was first released (and also RoF since release) and have had computers upgraded/replaced several times over that span.
However, over the past 3 years or so the technology has overtaken my comprehensive powers, it's like a new language.

Les 03-22-2011 11:36 PM

I know what you mean. It can take some time and research to learn and re-learn and remember what's what. I find the technology kind of interesting myself, so I try to keep somewhat up to date with it all, but I'm not really that into it. I'm certainly not pretending to be anything more than a dabbler in this sort of stuff. I don't mind answering questions if I can, and if it'll help others avoid wasting time and money, but it's a random kind of thing, done in passing if I just happen to feel like it at the time. I'm wary of muddying the waters even further though, so if what I say doesn't seem to make sense just let me know and I'll try to clarify my answers.

timholt 03-22-2011 11:57 PM

Hi Les, it makes sense when it is put into layman's terms thanks.
I think my best option now is to let the guy who is going to build it for me hit me with his suggested hardware list next week and I will post it here to get some advice on its viability/practicability.
He did mention one thing on the phone last time I spoke to him that you could possibly clarify;
He mentioned that the (CPU?) he had in mind had its own on board graphics capability that negated the need for a separate video card. What are your thoughts on that?

naz 03-23-2011 12:24 AM

I think what he is talking about is on board video that is on the motherboard. Most motherboards now have capability to do video and sound. Never, ever stick with on board video if your computer is used for gaming. You NEED a dedicated video card. All games need a dedicated video card to run properly. The on board video on any motherboard will not be able to handle any modern game, let alone something as resource hungry as a flight sim.

To be honest mate, if the guy building your rig knows you intend to use it for gaming and he is suggesting on board video, then I'd suggest he has no idea what he is talking about. You might want to shop around with another supplier?

I notice you are from Adelaide, I am in Sydney. Have a look at www.auspcmarket.com.au as a rough guide (don't worry, i don't work for them!). You can buy the components separately and build it yourself or just get a pre-made system built by them if that is preferable. They have systems on their website that are specifically designed for gaming.

Anyway, have a look and you might have a better idea of what you might want or need. If nothing else, you can get an idea of comparative pricing if you stick with the guy you are using now. In my experience, a lot of computer shops are unfortunately modern day "2nd hand car salesmen" and the fact this guy is suggesting on board video is a concern. There are plenty of other similar online shops around Australia, but I have bought all of my systems and upgrades from them for several years and have always had great service. Like you I have been playing IL2 since day one and have had many upgrades over the years. Anyway, have a good look around, you can never do too much window shopping, our hobby is not always cheap unfortunately.

And as for the original question. Yeah, Win7 64 bit is what I am using too...it is the way to go in my opinion. I use Satiek ruddle, throttle and stick and Track IR with no problems.

Good luck mate.

timholt 03-23-2011 02:07 AM

Hmmmmmmmm, food for thought - thanks. The guy building it (nothing set in concrete yet, still waiting for a quote) is a retired ex RAAF guy who works from home.
I was put onto him by someone who had one built for him and was happy with it.
I will check out the website you provided for pre built systems.
At the moment I am running;
Thermaltake Soprano Case
Thermaltake 750w Silent Pure Power
240Gig capacity
Asus P5N32-SLI-SE-Delux
4 Gig DDR2 800 HZ Kingston memory (but can only utilise 2.something because of Windows XP Home)
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz CPU
Gigabyte PCI-E 1GB 4870 video card
Creative X-Fi Extreme Music sound card
LG DVD Drive
Liteonit CD Drive
with Widows XP Home Edition
Would it be a worthwhile option to replace whatever need replacing in this set up and installing Sys 7 64 bit to get it to play Rof and IL2 CoD at a reasonable level?

naz 03-23-2011 03:00 AM

Perhaps I was being a tad harsh on the guy with the "2nd hand car salesman" reference, however, he does seem to be uninformed on the needs of a gaming rig...and at the end of the day, it is your money being spent.

The computer you are using now is pretty much the same as one of my previous rigs, except that I had a better video card (I cant remember which one to be honest, it was a while ago now). I was able to run IL2 fine with that and a big you-beaut flash top end video card at the time, however I reckon you'd definitely struggle with COD with that setup.

One thing you can and probably should do is transfer your current sound card over to the new rig...that will save you a little bit of coin. You could also transfer over your CD and DVD drives as well, but to be honest, they are so cheap nowadays that its probably better to just go with a new total system that is pre built. Depending on what video card etc you go with you "may" be able to keep the power source and the case as well but the beefier video cards need a big power supply so you would need to be sure if the current power supply can handle the card (and that it has the correct "plugs" to fit with the card).

To be honest, depending on your budget, you may as well just bite the bullet and get an entire new system if you are not sure how to transfer the components over yourself or are unsure of what components are going to be compatible with the new system. Its pretty hard to advise what to keep and what to change unless you are confident enough to be able to figure out what can be kept and to do a lot of the assembling and transferring over yourself.

I suppose it really comes down to how much you are prepared to spend mate. I admit I am not good at holding on to my money when it comes to upgrading. I am quite lazy so I tend to just bite the bullet and buy most components that are near the top end (but not at the top) of the scale. I do, however, generally splurge on the top end video card. Overall, at least I know I will be able to run all the newer games without much hassle. I just look around a fair bit to compare prices to be aware of how much I should be paying....I am sure you could buy a rig that is not at the top end but will still run the game fine, but to be honest, i am probably not the best person to advise you on that, given I have not really done the research and don't know what will give you the best bang for your buck. There are plenty of sites that review the various components however and you might get some good insights from a quick reading of them. Even if you (and I) don't understand all the technical references, you will still get enough of an idea from the reviews.

Off the top of my head; http://www.overclockers.com.au/ and http://www.tomshardware.com/ are decent review sites that I have used in the past and have gotten enough of an understanding of what I was buying to make an informed choice.

For what its worth, my rig is as follows;
Intel Core i7 950
Gigabyte EX58-UD5 m/board
6 Gig RAM
ATI Radeon 5970 Vid card
Win 7 64

That was reasonably beefy just over a year ago when I got it and it runs every game I have fluidly. For example, Shogun 2:Total War is a new release and it still runs flawlessly (@1920x1200 screen resolution) on my rig with all settings set to max.,,so fingers crossed, I should be right for COD.

Why not hold off on upgrading immediately mate? The game is out in less than two weeks (in Australia). I am sure there will be plenty of discussion from people on the various forums as to how COD runs on various setups. Perhaps then you might be more informed as to what system specifications will best suit your budget whilst being able to run the game at settings acceptable to you?

I have pre ordered COD on steam as well, so I will be happy to let you know how it runs on my system once I have had a go.

jhndavid 03-23-2011 04:22 AM

sir best to use 64 bit operating system
Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237140)
I am getting a new rig made to use with RoF and IL2 - Cliffs of Dover.
Should I:

stick with XP

Get 32 bit System 7 or

Get 64 bit System 7?

I am 64 years old and will not understand technical answers but the guy putting it together needs to know.


Heliocon 03-23-2011 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naz (Post 237547)
Perhaps I was being a tad harsh on the guy with the "2nd hand car salesman" reference, however, he does seem to be uninformed on the needs of a gaming rig...and at the end of the day, it is your money being spent.

The computer you are using now is pretty much the same as one of my previous rigs, except that I had a better video card (I cant remember which one to be honest, it was a while ago now). I was able to run IL2 fine with that and a big you-beaut flash top end video card at the time, however I reckon you'd definitely struggle with COD with that setup.

One thing you can and probably should do is transfer your current sound card over to the new rig...that will save you a little bit of coin. You could also transfer over your CD and DVD drives as well, but to be honest, they are so cheap nowadays that its probably better to just go with a new total system that is pre built. Depending on what video card etc you go with you "may" be able to keep the power source and the case as well but the beefier video cards need a big power supply so you would need to be sure if the current power supply can handle the card (and that it has the correct "plugs" to fit with the card).

To be honest, depending on your budget, you may as well just bite the bullet and get an entire new system if you are not sure how to transfer the components over yourself or are unsure of what components are going to be compatible with the new system. Its pretty hard to advise what to keep and what to change unless you are confident enough to be able to figure out what can be kept and to do a lot of the assembling and transferring over yourself.

I suppose it really comes down to how much you are prepared to spend mate. I admit I am not good at holding on to my money when it comes to upgrading. I am quite lazy so I tend to just bite the bullet and buy most components that are near the top end (but not at the top) of the scale. I do, however, generally splurge on the top end video card. Overall, at least I know I will be able to run all the newer games without much hassle. I just look around a fair bit to compare prices to be aware of how much I should be paying....I am sure you could buy a rig that is not at the top end but will still run the game fine, but to be honest, i am probably not the best person to advise you on that, given I have not really done the research and don't know what will give you the best bang for your buck. There are plenty of sites that review the various components however and you might get some good insights from a quick reading of them. Even if you (and I) don't understand all the technical references, you will still get enough of an idea from the reviews.

Off the top of my head; http://www.overclockers.com.au/ and http://www.tomshardware.com/ are decent review sites that I have used in the past and have gotten enough of an understanding of what I was buying to make an informed choice.

For what its worth, my rig is as follows;
Intel Core i7 950
Gigabyte EX58-UD5 m/board
6 Gig RAM
ATI Radeon 5970 Vid card
Win 7 64

That was reasonably beefy just over a year ago when I got it and it runs every game I have fluidly. For example, Shogun 2:Total War is a new release and it still runs flawlessly (@1920x1200 screen resolution) on my rig with all settings set to max.,,so fingers crossed, I should be right for COD.

Why not hold off on upgrading immediately mate? The game is out in less than two weeks (in Australia). I am sure there will be plenty of discussion from people on the various forums as to how COD runs on various setups. Perhaps then you might be more informed as to what system specifications will best suit your budget whilst being able to run the game at settings acceptable to you?

I have pre ordered COD on steam as well, so I will be happy to let you know how it runs on my system once I have had a go.

Yea but Shogun 2 is currently only running with DX9 and non Anti-Aliasing.

But Les and naz gave some really solid advice here. Unfortunetly many pc assemblers at stores really know very little about what they are selling as a finished machine, in the end many of them are salesmen. Thats why I would never buy a premade / shelf pc, because they like to list all the cool sounding and powerful hardware in the computer on their list, but conveniently leave out the fact that one part of another is very cheap because thats their profit margin. Unfortunetly with pcs there has to be a balance, because the weakest link in the chain (slowest component) slows the whole computer down to its speed.

Also onboard graphics is a giant no no. Same with sound although some people dont care about low quality sound, low quality onboard graphics however will be a big spoiler.

naz 03-23-2011 07:40 AM

Just to clarify, when I refer to "pre-made" I actually mean you selecting the components you want (albeit using the "gaming systems" from a shop like the one I referred you to as a helpful starting point or a good base -- Most of these stores will allow you to chop and change components even within their prebuilt systems) and then letting them assemble it all and test it for you if you are unable to do so yourself.

Like Heliocon, I would never buy a shelf system from most "mom and pop" stores or somewhere like Harvey Norman etc. ... and certainly not from a retired guy working from home who suggests on board video for a gaming rig, no matter how good his intentions may be.

Hope I have been of some help mate.

timholt 03-23-2011 08:17 AM

[/QUOTE]For what its worth, my rig is as follows;
Intel Core i7 950
Gigabyte EX58-UD5 m/board
6 Gig RAM
ATI Radeon 5970 Vid card
Win 7 64

Why not hold off on upgrading immediately mate? The game is out in less than two weeks (in Australia). I am sure there will be plenty of discussion from people on the various forums as to how COD runs on various setups. Perhaps then you might be more informed as to what system specifications will best suit your budget whilst being able to run the game at settings acceptable to you?
[/QUOTE]

Naz,
good advice I think and probably the best way to go. I have spent biggest part of the last 2 days trying to come to grips with all the various options for hardware and ended up with a pounding headache and no further advanced on any selection.
Do you perchance play Rise of Flight and if so how does your rig handle that?
And yes, I would be interested in how it handles CoD thanks.

naz 03-23-2011 09:34 AM

Yeah, I know exactly how you feel mate...I upgrade every 2 or three years and the computer parts and architecture all seem so to have changed so much each time I have had to delve into it.

It can really do your head in trying to learn or re-learn enough so you can be confident enough to even just know what it is you are buying! They way the various CPU and Video Card models are labelled are often so damn messy as well, so it just seems impossible to follow it sometimes.

I suppose it is a matter of breaking it down to the major components you need (CPU, motherboard, RAM, Video Card etc) and systematically going through them one by one to work out which is the best one for your budget...and which ones tie in together.

Actually, I can tell you what was a great help for me last time I upgraded. Go to a newsagent when you get a spare minute and buy a copy of an Australian gaming magazine called "PC Powerplay". I haven't looked at it for a while, but they used to have a section each month called the "Beast" which was a list of all the parts they would use to build the best monster gaming rig...if money was no object. Of course, that is way out of most of our price ranges, but they also had the same lists for lesser-beasts and budget beasts that would get you a great computer at a more realistic price. Anyway I used to look at those and they were extremely helpful in pointing me where to start.

I don't have RoF as yet but IL2 runs smooth as silk on my rig (my IL2 is heavily modded as well).

Again, good luck mate....you will eventually see some light at the end of the tunnel, and to be honest, its quite a sense of satisfaction when you have a nice rig running your favorite game smoothly, knowing you chose everything inside personally.

Cheers :)

timholt 03-23-2011 10:05 AM

Thanks again Naz, I shall check out the mag at the newsagents tomorrow for some (hopefully) enlightenment.
p.s. my rig also plays IL2-1946 on perfect smooth as silk. On RoF it starts to stutter if there are more than 3 or 4 a/c in the near vicinity. I have been hanging off upgrading waiting for CoD specs to be published. As it turned out they were a lot less than I expected, albeit minimum requirements, a sure way to get the unwary to purchase methinks.

PeterPanPan 03-23-2011 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 237449)
Dont need to do that. Win 7 has a "compatibility mode" which allows you to run software thats only compatible with older versions of windows. So I can choose to launch the software in compatibility mode for XP sp2 - and it emulates it. No need for dual boot :grin:

True, Win 7 does have that compatibility mode, but it's not 100%. I have just tried to to run some old accounting software in Win 7 and whilst it mainly works, there are a few bits in it which do not. The only way to be sure it will work 100% is within XP. ;)

naz 03-23-2011 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 237619)
Thanks again Naz, I shall check out the mag at the newsagents tomorrow for some (hopefully) enlightenment.
p.s. my rig also plays IL2-1946 on perfect smooth as silk. On RoF it starts to stutter if there are more than 3 or 4 a/c in the near vicinity. I have been hanging off upgrading waiting for CoD specs to be published. As it turned out they were a lot less than I expected, albeit minimum requirements, a sure way to get the unwary to purchase methinks.

No worries mate. I always ignore the minimum requirements that game publishers give....in my experience, they always seem to be the bare minimum that will get only just get the game to run (but with pretty much everything ingame set to the lowest possible level). I'd probably use the "recommended" specs for the game as your lowest bar for an upgrade.

Let us know how you get on. :-)

Les 03-23-2011 05:58 PM

I pretty much agree with the other comments made here. I did get the impression though your potential computer builder was referring to the on-board graphics of the new Intel Sandy Bridge CPU's. If so, they might be better than the on-board graphics you can get built into motherboards, but yes, you'd still want a dedicated graphics/video card if putting together a decent gaming system. The thing is, you might still end up getting one of those new Sandy Bridge CPU's (as they are pretty good), but only using it as a CPU, and not using it's in-built graphics processing ability.

As you said (?), if you put up a tentative list of what you're thinking of getting, after seeing how playable CloDo really is, I'm sure you'll get some feedback. No guaranteeing it'll make your decision-making any easier though.:grin:

naz 03-23-2011 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Les (Post 237845)
I did get the impression though your potential computer builder was referring to the on-board graphics of the new Intel Sandy Bridge CPU's. If so, they might be better than the on-board graphics you can get built into motherboards, but yes, you'd still want a dedicated graphics/video card if putting together a decent gaming system. The thing is, you might still end up getting one of those new Sandy Bridge CPU's (as they are pretty good), but only using it as a CPU, and not using it's in-built graphics processing ability.

Well, there you go...I must admit the video capability of the Sandy Bridge CPU had not crossed my mind. Just shows how out of touch with the new hardware one can get when only looking at it all every few years for upgrades ...perhaps I owe your guy an apology timholt!

As Les said though, you'd most likely still want a dedicated video card. You got some reading ahead of you old boy ;-)

Heliocon 03-23-2011 10:34 PM

This post from me is about 3-4 months old, it was copied and pasted into the thread for shogun to help players with their setups. Some of the info is a bit outdated and or could be twinked but it gives a good general rundown of components and I would say applies to COD well interms of the engine being scaled up in the future.

http://forums.totalwar.com/showthrea...ead-first-post)

Basic Guidline:


by: Heliocon

The Technical Staff of this forum did not make the following guideline, and its more for rating than buying any said hardware, always ask if a specific piece of hardware is good for your system by PMing me(hardwaremaster) or mentioning it in the thread.

This guide is for the following reason.
Shogun 2: Can my rig handle her, and if so what can I expect? Also if I am upgrading, what should I trend towards for future tw games and upgrade-ability in order to incrementally max out the graphics!


Basics: Shogun will run in DX9/10, and in DX11. DX9 is available in XP and up. DX10 and DX11 are avalable in Vista and Win 7.
DX9/10: You can expect modern game graphics, an improvement over NTW, but not a leap.

What do I need?: Minimum specs and/or:

GPU:

Nvidia = 8800 or 9800, these cards are DX9/10 capable, they give good performance. I would not go any lower then this. Mid to high range 200 series cards will also do the trick. If you dont want Dx11 but want better performance, consider SLI.

ATI = I know less about ATI but I would suggest Radeon HD 4000 series, aim for a 4800 for high range DX9/10 graphical quality. Consider CrossFire to improve performance.


CPU:

XP: A higher end dual core absolute minimum (Single core OCing doesnt gain much due to NM architecture heat, remember minimum specs are what you need to boot the game up and see moving pixels, so take them as exactly that: What do I need to play the game in the most simple way possible, lowest resolution and still be operable etc.), anything less will lead to likely very bad performance that cannot be remedied other then increasing the CPU clock or replacing it.
A better option is a intel i5 cpu, which gives you four threads (not hyperthreaded) or the AMD equivalent. XP does not handle multiple threads very well so a i7 would be a waste of money. For the AMD you want a AMD X4 Phenom, which has four cores but is par for par slower then Intel i5-i7 range.

Vista: Vista strains the system more then XP, but it also makes better use of threads and therefor gives bigger benefits for 4 core CPU's. I suggest a Intel i5-i7 (again) or a high range AMD x4 Phenom II.

Ram: This is simplified to assume people running vista/xp are on 32bit not 64bit which will be addressed for DX11. The maximum ram for XP 32bit is 4gb (which wont show as 4 due to system addressing ram ie, reserving ram for xp tasks and therefor unless your a techhead, improves performance but by buffing XP rather then programs).

XP: 2gb minimum, aim for 4gb of ddr2 ram (800mhz should do it).
Vista: 4gb of ddr2/ddr3 ram, 800mhz minimum. Vista is a system hog, it in many cases uses MORE rescources then Windows 7 does! At the same time the 32bit limits your upper end and therefor you get caught with a limited expansion ability, yet need for more rescources.


Windows 7-64bit + DX11: 64 bit is very much a must for win7. It allows the OS access to much much more power then 32 bit. With Win7 home max ram is 16gb, with higher tiers of win7 the cap moves to over 100gb. Win7 is the new "XP" and I would strongly suggest people to skip vista and move to Win7. Win7 also has DX11 Exclusively.

DX11: You can expect a major leap in graphical quality and performance. DX11 allows tessalation which will be applied to character models allowing a massive increase in geometry detail with less performance hit. This could and may also be used on terrain in and outside of the battle map. It also allows direct compute and physics enabling complex particle interaction such as volumetric clouds and fog that swirls when a horse runs through it for example, banners that ripple and move realistically when carried or when there is a wind along with particle effects such as dust and smoke, water effects such as dynamic interactive splashing when a soldier walks through a puddle/river. You can also expect substantially better quality shading/lighting with less performance hit, more light sources (like lanterns the troops hold and how the light interacts with the models geometry) and much improved performance for visuals with CPU's with more then 2 cores.

What you need:


GPU:
Nvidia = Nvidia 400 and 500 series are DX11 gpu's. Nvidia 400 series is no longer in serial production, its now 500s only. They use the same chip set but the 500 is redesigned to reduce heat, be more efficient and that enabled them to "turn on" parts of the GPU that were previously disabled. Due to this 400's will be very cheap very soon and will be comparable with ATI in price vs performance. I would suggest a 460GT as a minimum, they are popular due to their common use in SLI. A 460 might not enable ultra settings, but certainly will give you the DX11 eye candy, if not in full detail. A 480GTX, 570gt will allow you most likely to max out the game's dx11 features.
ATI = ATI Radeon 5000 or 6000 series cards are DX11 compatable and many people will say are better bang for your buck then Nvidia cards. ATI naming schemes are notoriously bad, but a higher number 5 or 6 should do fine with the game. It should be mentioned ATI cards seem to perform better at texturing and lighting, but suffer under DX11 tesselation vs Nvidia. They have the reputation as good performance for price though, so dont discount them (trying to be honest here, this is from a Nvidia fanboy :P ).

CPU: W7 makes good use of multithreaded applications and CPU's. DX11 also eases mutlithreaded interactions with the CPU improving efficiency.
Intel: Core i7 (930 should be fine and give great performance especially if OCed, feel free to go higher). i7 is 4 core but 8 threads allowing better performance (substantially). The new sandy bridge CPU's you should only consider due to them lowering the G1 i7 range prices. They are 32nm not 40nm, which has improved there performance per wat, and therefore size/heat allowing a higher stock OC which makes them look more powerful then a G1 i7. Ignore this, and if you cant OC buy a stock OCed i7 cpu. Sand bridge also has a integrated GPU on many of the cpus increasing their cost for little/no benefit.

AMD: I would strongly discourage a AMD CPU currently until the Bulldozer line is released. The new 4 core architecture will allow the equivalent of hyperthreading (intels x2 multiplier) except the bulldozer threading is hardware based not software (hyperthreading) inside the core. It remains to be seen how well Bulldozer will pull its weight.

Ram: Since you will be running Win7:
Min: 4gb absolute minimum of ddr3 1200mhz+ ram. Stock my win7 uses near 2gb of ram idle for the OS leaving 2gb for games/software in this config.
Aim for: 6gb-8gb is the sweat spot currently. It will allow you much improved game performance due to less hard drive paging and is necessary due to the nature of the threading and processing in the background. This can come either as dual or tri channel memory, so think about upgrade-ability in the future when buying since the sticks have to all be the same.

Thanks and I hope this helps people!

timholt 03-24-2011 12:18 AM

Men, I am absolutely overwhelmed by these responses - once again many thanks.

I had a look the Mag Naz mentioned yesterday, went straight over to the right hand column titled 'the beast', glanced down the bottom and saw $1500 plus. Thought this is not bad and went one column left (the beastie) and saw $2,975, rechecked the right hand column (the beast) again and its $15,615.
When the palpitations ceased I had a slower look at the beastie column and, without the periphials that I already have it is thus;
CPU Intel i7 2600 $339 or AMD Phenom II x4 965 BE @ 3.4gh
Mobo Asus P8P67 Pro $239
Ram Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz (2 x 4Gb) $149
Video Gigabyte HD6950 (1GB) crossfire $640 ( but I read somewhere RoF does not like crossfire???????) or a Radeon 6950 2GB
Power Silverstone Strider 850W Gold $229
Samsung SH-B123A Blu-ray optical drive combo $69 (do I really need blu-ray for 2 flight sims only)
Storage WD Caviar Black 1TB $120
Case Coolmaster CM690 II Advantage $140

The only item not mentioned is a sound card.

Look OK gurus?

I will still take the advice of waiting for some feedback on CoD after release and some user comments but at least I feel some headway has been made, rather than head done in as per the previous 2 days.

naz 03-24-2011 02:08 AM

That all looks pretty decent to me mate. I had a very quick look at the Intel CPU online and it looks to be quite bloody good (If anything its possibly a bit of overkill, and you could probably save a hundred or so by going one level lower with the CPU, for example an i5 2500, and using the extra $ on the video card(s) - kind of depends on how CoD actually performs on release I guess). I don't think you need the Bluray if your only using the computer for the two flight sims obviously. You could transfer over your existing drives (but as mentioned before, a new DVD/cd drive is basically spare change now anyway). Your current sound Card is a definite keeper though, hang on to it and transfer it over to the new machine.

Regarding the Video cards, I have always steered away from crossfire. The only reason being is I always tend to see people in forums having problems with it in various games ... but I have never looked into it properly to have a real opinion I must admit: - it may well work perfectly fine for ROF, IL2 and CoD? Perhaps the other lads can advise you on that. As I sort of mentioned earlier, I tend to just whore myself out to the biggest strongest video card on the market at the time I upgrade so I have no idea on how the mid-range cards perform in practice. From the little I have read though, they seem generally capable of holding their own in many games.

I've also noticed a few similar threads to this on this very website, so perhaps you should have a look through those to get some more ideas.

In any event, like you said, you seem to now have a good starting point and can take it from there once the performance reports of CoD start getting revealed by us all next week.

PS: - You know, i actually thought about mentioning the usual heavy price tag for the "beast" when I typed the message out yesterday, but thought, ...nah, he'll enjoy the surprise of seeing the price tag on his own :-) lol

Thee_oddball 03-24-2011 03:39 AM

timholt here is what i posted for someone else..cheers :)



motherboard (i have this one :::::::)) $90
ASRock 870 EXTREME3 AM3 AMD 870 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard $90
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813157198

CPU = $229 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition Thuban 3.3GHz, 3.7GHz Turbo 6 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103913

VIDEO= $210 SAPPHIRE 100314SR Radeon HD 6870 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814102909

RAM= $85 G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1333 (PC3 10666)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231311

PSU= $160 SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W ATX12V V2.3/EPS 12V V2.91 SLI Ready 80 PLUS GOLD Certified Modular Active PFC Power Supply
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817151087

Heliocon 03-24-2011 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timholt (Post 238014)
Men, I am absolutely overwhelmed by these responses - once again many thanks.

I had a look the Mag Naz mentioned yesterday, went straight over to the right hand column titled 'the beast', glanced down the bottom and saw $1500 plus. Thought this is not bad and went one column left (the beastie) and saw $2,975, rechecked the right hand column (the beast) again and its $15,615.
When the palpitations ceased I had a slower look at the beastie column and, without the periphials that I already have it is thus;
CPU Intel i7 2600 $339 or AMD Phenom II x4 965 BE @ 3.4gh
Mobo Asus P8P67 Pro $239
Ram Corsair Vengeance 1600Mhz (2 x 4Gb) $149
Video Gigabyte HD6950 (1GB) crossfire $640 ( but I read somewhere RoF does not like crossfire???????) or a Radeon 6950 2GB
Power Silverstone Strider 850W Gold $229
Samsung SH-B123A Blu-ray optical drive combo $69 (do I really need blu-ray for 2 flight sims only)
Storage WD Caviar Black 1TB $120
Case Coolmaster CM690 II Advantage $140

The only item not mentioned is a sound card.

Look OK gurus?

I will still take the advice of waiting for some feedback on CoD after release and some user comments but at least I feel some headway has been made, rather than head done in as per the previous 2 days.

Not horrible but definitly overpriced. When you get a shop to assemble it for you, you have to know that you will most likely get screwed in some way. Also the ram is far too little -you want to aim for 6-8gb as the current sweet spot. I payed about over 3.3k for my machine and all its components about 5-6months ago and I have a i7-980x, 480gtx and 12gb of 1600mhz ram and EVGA 4 way sli mobo. So when I look at the cost of your machine to me it seems over priced (but thats why I didnt buy a pc off alienware also).

But overall I would say you should get minimum of 6gb of ram, might want to look at changing the gpu (I am not great with AMD gpus, so someone else should recommend) and check the RPM on the Hard drive. I was thinking of going either SSD or SATA2 raptors but instead I settled on a Western digital 2tb 7200rpm drive but with a 64mb cache, which makes it a really awesome harddrive for its size (its pretty fast).


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.