![]() |
Hs-129 Gunsight
Is there a guide/tips available on how to use the gunsight in the new plane? :)
I have no idea what each of the angled "cursors" represent or how to use them. EDIT - if anyone had a document stating some engine boost and rpm settings for cruise, combat, etc I would be thankful as well. :) |
I've found some Hs-129 manuals on this site.
They seem to contain the info that I want, but I don't understand German (and the Gothic font in the first one is unreadable :) ) http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/oth...als-20666.html You have to register to download, but there are interesting images included - it's worth a look. If anyone could translate the first one at least, I'd be grateful :D |
angled cursor?
convergence 700-1000m for 3.7/7.5 |
That's what I use already for those big guns :)
Here are the "cursors" on the left side of the gunsight. Because they are only on the 1942 version, and not the one with the elephant-gun, I think they are an aid for bomb dropping, but I can't figure out how they're used. http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/a...Untitled-1.jpg http://i984.photobucket.com/albums/a.../Untitled2.jpg |
According to the German manual you linked it's an aiming aid for level bombing depending on your flight altitude.
1st line: 10m above ground 2nd line: 50m above ground 3rd line: 100m above ground 4th line: 200m above ground |
At what speed?
|
Quote:
http://en.valka.cz/files/ruffer_hens...oto_07_802.jpg So I am curious if you can find out (I never seriously tried). It should theoretically work better with 6DoF, as then you can perfectly line up your PoV with the plates. But fixed PoV should work also good enough. |
1st line: 10m above ground ...
Thats interesting. |
Quote:
I just drop the bombs on guess, and that usually works just fine, especially with columns of vehicles, as soon as the first vehicle passes under my nose at about 50 meters height, the AB-23 will do it's job very good. |
Easy solution ;)
Minimum height for Zünder 25 (Fuse 25) was 10m (horizontal) http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/243...bombenwurf.jpg |
Quote:
|
This should be posted in the bomb fusing thread.
|
Quote:
|
Well the document posted above seems to be irrefutable proof that the fusing is wrong,and the HS129 bombsight seems to back that up,perhaps now TD will reconsider for the sake of realism.
|
The data this document shows says:
o.V. (ohne Verzögerung -> without delay) 0,08 s. Wrong -> correct 0 s. m.V. (mit Verzögerung -> with delay) 14 s. Wrong -> correct 0,08s. the rest, look 2 posts further :-D While the minimum altitude is printed, the arming time isn't. and even then, it's the ONLY proven indication, so far, that TD's generaliziced arming delay is off. The art of reading only what suits one's agenda! |
Quote:
|
For crying out loud, your "irrefutable proof" is a document which you do not understand? Man, educate yourself!
0.08s is fuse delay in the mode "m.V." - that's a delay you need for instance if you want a bomb to explode inside a house, behind armour or something like that. 14s is fuse delay in the mode "Vz" - that's a bomb delay that allows the plane to clear of the bomb before it explodes. There's also the mode "o.V." - that's without any delay, instant action. The arming times for the ELAZ 25B were 0.8-1.7s in the mode "Vz" 5.6-10.4s in the mode "m.V." 3.0-6.9s in the mode "o.V" where the time range within each setting is due to the characteristics of the individual fuse, some being quicker to arm, some slower. If you do not give the bomb the maximum time to arm, you are risking duds, if you're not giving it the minimum time to arm, it will be a dud. The minimum release altitude for the 25B fuse is also listed and given with 12m, that's for the "Vz" mode. For those interested, "o.V." - "ohne Verzögerung" - "without delay" "m.V" - "mit Verzögerung" - "with delay" "Vz" - "Verzug" - "delay" (but another word) These settings could be chosen at the ZSK, the bomb arming apparatus installed in the aircraft, prior to dropping the bombs. |
Thanks for the help with the documents Talonite.
I ran some tests, however, and the aiming guides don't seem to work as advertised :) Dropping from 50 meters using the second indicator from the top works almost perfectly. However, dropping from 100 meters, I had to use an area between the 3rd and 4th indicators. From 100 meters, using the 3rd indicator led to the bombs falling short. The same occured at 200 using the 4th indicator. All drops were done at almost exactly 300 kph, straight and level. I don't know what the reason for the differences could be, but for now, I think I'll stick to dropping from 50-100 meters. |
Quote:
plus I got nothing but the cutposted above, still it's rather worth an official reconsideration about the minimal dropping heights |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If used properly they are devastating! The cluster bombs used at high level are ideal for clearing enemy air bases in almost one sweep! http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...n/bild8as3.jpg |
Quote:
One question though, and I've always wondered why, if you drop a big AB bomb, what the heck are those weird smoke plume thingies which litter the battlefield? Almost looks like a gas attack from the WW1 |
Quote:
On my screen shot AB1000 where used. |
Quote:
...the smaller ones really suck. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I can't translate, but noticed that Page 27 of the Hs 129A-B Abwurfwaffee.pdf you link to has these numbers listed:
10m / 85 degrees 50m / 78.5 degrees 100m / 74 degrees 200m / 68 degrees We know with the 2 second fuse that the 10m option is a no go. But the others, we can use bombsight table 2 to back into the required IAS. 280 kph seems to be the magic number for the rest. I haven't tested yet. |
No joy. Did a couple tests at 200m/280kph and bombs come up short. Need to either bump up the elevations or the speeds to make the sight work.
Edit: Hi, yes. I understand them to be bombing angles for level bombing. Just need to find the TAS/elevation combinations for each angle to make it work. Edit II: Managed to score EAD tank with the 200 meter bombing angle. Throttle at 110%. IAS around 330-350 kph. Was using 250kg and full tank gas. Target tank was at sea level. That bottom angle is a little distorted with 2DOF, so you have to take that into account. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
EDIT: I see you've reached that conclusion too. Quote:
Quote:
So, rather than dropping where the distorted 4th angle indicates, I've been dropping when the targets disappear under my nose. Even so, the bombs fly far short. I can hit targets at 100 meters only by dropping in an area between the 3rd and 4th indicators. At 50 meters, the second indicator works perfectly. |
Along the nice authentic manual of HS129, there is also a great book to read about HS129. It is 'HS129 Panzerjager!' by Martin Pegg published from Classic Publications.
In the Page 50, I found some useful information on the gunsight & vanes. 'This consisted of a Revi C12/C or C12/D sight, on the side of which was mounted a crude form of bombsight comprising four horizontal vanes with vertical wires passing through them. Release heights of 10, 50, 100 or 200m(33, 164, 328, 656 ft) were marked on the vanes and the pilot aimed his bombs by aligning the target with the particular vane appropriate for release altitude.' That's all and there is no related picture or description with it. So it's a bit confusing. Which vane is for 10m? Is that top for 10m or the bottom one is for 10m? Well I don't know. :) |
top vane -> 10m
bottom vane -> 200m |
Quote:
It would be nice to see incendiary effects improved in 4.10 (eg. The napalm effect of the M-13) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.