Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Project galba (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=17522)

Ctrl E 12-01-2010 09:52 AM

Project galba
 
We saw some beautiful pics some while back of the aircraft that were work in progress of the planned Korean war expansion for storm of war. Any chance we might get an update one day where this project is at?

In hope...:)

The Kraken 12-01-2010 10:20 AM

Last we've heard is that the project is on hold because the team has joined the SoW development. Work is supposed to restart once the main release is done. It's of course possible that there is some low-profile work by modelers or such going on. Will be interesting to see how fast new scenarios can be produced once the core engine is done (fingers crossed :))

Skoshi Tiger 12-01-2010 01:03 PM

It's good to know that the P51, F86 and assorted planes are sitting on a harddrive somewhere waiting to be finished off when SOW is released.

lbuchele 12-01-2010 07:18 PM

I think that Oleg said once that once finished the main engine (SOW) we probably will see one new installment every 1 or 1,5 year...
Nobody knows about the role third party might have doing their own add-ons too.

zakkandrachoff 12-01-2010 09:16 PM

1- cliff of dover
2- battle for moscow
3-...?
#- korea

IceFire 12-01-2010 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zakkandrachoff (Post 201922)
1- cliff of dover
2- battle for moscow
3-...?
#- korea

Wasn't Battle for Moscow a tournament they were advertising and not an expansion? I thought it was widely known that North Africa would be part of the mix after Battle of Britain.

major_setback 12-01-2010 11:45 PM

SaQSoN himself said that he hoped Galba would be the first expansion to be released. I'm not sure that that idicates that it is near completion, but it indicates that there is at least a possibility of this.

Chivas 12-02-2010 01:26 AM

Project Galba (by luthier) should be the first addition to the series considering all the work that has been done so far by luthier's team.

I'm hoping Oleg's team is still considering doing the Med in his next addition to the SOW series. Although I'm sure there is some local pressure to do the Eastern front.

I have no idea what the Battle of Moscow is all about. Third party addon? or a competition??? If it is an third party addon its doubtful it will be as far along as Galba. Either way it shouldn't effect Oleg's team if he's doing the Med.

Ctrl E 12-02-2010 06:46 AM

think about the things you could do in a korean senario:

carrier ops.

fly high performance piston aircraft - the final evolution of the WWII-era fighters - the F4U-4/5, seafury and La-9

fly early jets - the Mig-15, F-86 and F9F

nightfighter missions with the Tigercat

You could even fly the Polikarpov U-2 in bombing raids. Maybe the A-26 too.

Old_Canuck 12-02-2010 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IceFire (Post 201936)
Wasn't Battle for Moscow a tournament they were advertising and not an expansion? I thought it was widely known that North Africa would be part of the mix after Battle of Britain.

O-Team's Cliffs of Dover
O-Team's Korea
O-Team's Africa

Viking 12-02-2010 08:44 AM

Maybe not!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ctrl E (Post 201955)
think about the things you could do in a korean senario:

carrier ops.

fly high performance piston aircraft - the final evolution of the WWII-era fighters - the F4U-4/5, seafury and La-9

fly early jets - the Mig-15, F-86 and F9F

nightfighter missions with the Tigercat

You could even fly the Polikarpov U-2 in bombing raids. Maybe the A-26 too.

I think the carriers are "protected" by copy righs, sooo probably not.

Viking

Ctrl E 12-02-2010 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viking (Post 201966)
I think the carriers are "protected" by copy righs, sooo probably not.

Viking

rubbish. really?

JG53Frankyboy 12-02-2010 11:36 AM

it depends on what Grumman is holding the copyrights.....
at least the F9F ............ dont know about the Lexington class CVs.
But it was the same builder as the Yorktown, and a WIP Yorktown was not finnished for IL" because of the "Grumman-affair" IIRC ....

JVM 12-02-2010 12:10 PM

The Grumman affair, that was Pacific Fighters, UBI and 2004...Things have evolved, people have evolved (I would not chance saying which direction!) since then...
Lessons have probably been learned, and things done according to whatever rules have to be followed...

This will be an add-on (or complete game) installed over another game itself brand new, possibly with a different publisher than UBI, so the truth is we have absolutely no way to know what would happen, what has been negotiated, so why making any kind of statement?
What I know is that models of Grumman A/C or CW carriers are available on the market and continue to appear...so you would think some arrangements are always possible!

We shall see...

JV

JG52Krupi 12-02-2010 06:50 PM

Anyone got the pics handy, i wouldn't mind drooling over the P-51 pics again... :D

Ctrl E 12-02-2010 08:29 PM

the pics of the P-51 really were wonderful. i'd love to see some more from different angles.

koivis 12-02-2010 09:56 PM

While the whole Grumman issue was totally *censored*, I made a list for the nice corporate people of all the great Northrop-Grumman stufff which served in Korean War. Hope this reminds them how important their contribution to the war effort was and helps them to not miss anything important. :rolleyes:

Grumman F7F Tigercat
Grumman F9F Panther
Grumman AF Guardian
Grumman SA-16 Albatros
Northrop F-15 Reporter

As the Westinghouse Electric Corporation is also part of the company, the following aircraft using Westinghouse J34 turbojets are also on the list:

Douglas F3D Skyknight
McDonnell F2H Banshee

Let's not forget these either:

Westinghouse AN/APG-26 fire control radar in F3D
AN/APQ-35 and AN/APS-21 search radars in F3D and F2H
AN/APS-31 search radar in PBM Mariner, AD Skyraider, P2V Neptune and AF Guardian

Send the cheque to *censored*

Blackdog_kt 12-02-2010 10:00 PM

Just posting here to answer the question about Battle of Moscow. I can't provide specific references and links as it will take too long to find them and i'm in a bit of a hurry at the moment, but i clearly remember this has been explained and discussed at length in the recent threads about the Igromir expo. For anyone who wants to refresh their memory, feel free to browse that thread.

To make it short, Battle of Moscow is not about the competition (although there was a national IL2 competition held during the expo in a separate part of the booth). It's not a 3rd party add-on either.

It's actually an add-on/expansion for SoW, it's done by the Maddox team and it was advertised side by side with BoB during the expo, so it's as official as it gets. At least that's the information we got in the thread about the expo, as i clearly remember mr Oleg Maddox mentioning that mr Roman Denikin, his lead systems designer/programmer, has done a lot of work for the Moscow add-on.

It seems that these are actually the 2 officialy confirmed titles, BoB and Moscow. Korea is on hold until BoB is done, but i guess you could say it's semi-official.

As for the N. Africa theater, it has been discussed very heavily both by developers and by us the fans, but there's nothing official about it yet. Maybe it's because a lot of the planes would be similar, so it would be easier/faster to make (ie, it would mostly need map work and most of the map is featureless desert anyway). Actually, the similarity in planesets is probably the main reason the developers are interested, since they will be able to produce an expansion in a very small amount of time compared to other theaters.

Apart from BoB however, Battle of Moscow is still the only installment to have ever been officially advertised.

My personal speculation? I think it will not be an "all-in-one" eastern front campaign like the original IL-2.
Oleg's comments about Roman Denikin being highly involved (i think he said "you can't imagine how many complex stuff our guy Roman has managed to model for the moscow add-on", or something to that effect, when people were discussing the amount of key-bindings visible in the screenshots from the options screen) leads me to believe it will be a case study of the operating procedures and ground controlled interceptions that were standard doctrine of the Soviet air forces. I guess it will be more about flying barrier CAPs and intercepting He111s at 5000m in a Mig3 than weaving amid the trees and hills in an IL2.

IceFire 12-02-2010 10:33 PM

Thanks Blackdog! Interesting and not what I expected...

I hope this Battle for Moscow is a good simulation. I'm still hoping that it's a proper flight sim then... Ground control doesn't sound too interesting to me but flying Yaks and 109s against each other does sound good. Moscow is a pretty substantial battle and there will be a lot of content that will need to be put together. I wish them luck!

As for North Africa... depending on the timeline yes a lot of aircraft will be the same but they will also have a whole bunch of new ones. Updated Spitfires are probably an easy thing but then you have things like the Boston/Havoc, Baltimore, Wildcat (I guess that could be skipped), large numbers of P-40 variants, Macchis, Re2000 and more...weird thought... who wants a flyable Me323? :D

Chivas 12-03-2010 12:22 AM

I'm finding it hard to believe that the Battle of Moscow is being built by Olegs team. It would be counter productive to delay the release of the Battle of Britain because a section of your development team is working on a different addon. It doesn't smell right unless they've picked up more monies for development considering the financial pressure Oleg has been under to release BOB.

PilotError 12-03-2010 11:51 AM

Hi,

I was reading Blackdogs recent post and it is quite different to the situation that I believed was taking place.

My understanding is that Maddox Games are producing the core game of SoW:BoB or whatever it is going to be called (I think we can all agree on that point).

If I have picked up all the nods, winks and hints correctly then Maddox Games will then move onto the Med/Africa theatre.

The Battle for Moscow is being developed by a third party (with some help from the Maddox team) and should be released shortly after BoB.

Project Galba (Korea) is currently on hold as that team are assisting in BoB.

The problem is that we have to rely on a hint here or a nod there for much of this information, so it is no surprise that people will come to different conclusions.
I'm not saying I am right and Blackdog is wrong, but just that I have came to a different conclusion as to what is happening with the limited information that is available.

It would be nice if we could get some official clarification.

=69.GIAP=TOOZ 12-03-2010 04:37 PM

This was my impression as well that the Battle for Moscow is a 3rd party production with support from Oleg's team.

4H_V-man 12-04-2010 02:43 AM

I was really hoping to see Maddox go back to at least the Battle of Poland, if not to the Spanish Civil War, then progress chronologically from there with add-ons covering the entire scope of the war.

There are tons of aircraft I've never seen in a good combat flight sim that could be made available with this approach. Lots of Polish, French, Czech, Romanian aircraft. One of the things that has always interested me about WW II aviation is the fact that most of the countries basically started the war with little more than WW I tech and by the end of the war aircraft were nearing Mach 1.

IceFire 12-04-2010 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4H_V-man (Post 202362)
I was really hoping to see Maddox go back to at least the Battle of Poland, if not to the Spanish Civil War, then progress chronologically from there with add-ons covering the entire scope of the war.

There are tons of aircraft I've never seen in a good combat flight sim that could be made available with this approach. Lots of Polish, French, Czech, Romanian aircraft. One of the things that has always interested me about WW II aviation is the fact that most of the countries basically started the war with little more than WW I tech and by the end of the war aircraft were nearing Mach 1.

I am definitely one of those who would love to have pretty much all of those types present in a sim. That said... how interesting would the Battle of Poland be? A several day scenario where Poland is soundly defeated militarily and scrambles to get it's troops out of the country so they can reform elsewhere. The air battles, although intriguing would be desperate and ultimately I'm not sure how interesting that would be to play even if it is historically.

I like the approach they are taking and glad to get on to some very interesting areas of the war.

kendo65 12-04-2010 11:06 AM

I'm not a fan of the chronological approach myself. I accept that there is a wealth of neglected aircraft and conflicts that could be covered, but that they haven't been done up to now says a lot - it means they probably wouldn't be that popular beyond a small bunch of enthusiasts - and that means they wouldn't sell as well.

I think the official releases should aim to cover as many of the big theatres of action (Eastern Front, West 42-45, N. Africa, Pacific) as quickly as possible. The minor aircraft and theatres could then be filled in by some third party paid add-ons similar to those for MS Flightsim. If the SOW series takes off as I expect, other companies will start producing one-off extra aircraft and maps - I think we'll soon be awash in more aircraft than we know what to do with!

:)

Blackdog_kt 12-05-2010 04:03 AM

First of all, thanks for the feedback.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas (Post 202078)
I'm finding it hard to believe that the Battle of Moscow is being built by Olegs team. It would be counter productive to delay the release of the Battle of Britain because a section of your development team is working on a different addon. It doesn't smell right unless they've picked up more monies for development considering the financial pressure Oleg has been under to release BOB.

What you say makes perfect sense...

Quote:

Originally Posted by PilotError (Post 202132)
Hi,

I was reading Blackdogs recent post and it is quite different to the situation that I believed was taking place.

My understanding is that Maddox Games are producing the core game of SoW:BoB or whatever it is going to be called (I think we can all agree on that point).

If I have picked up all the nods, winks and hints correctly then Maddox Games will then move onto the Med/Africa theatre.

The Battle for Moscow is being developed by a third party (with some help from the Maddox team) and should be released shortly after BoB.

Project Galba (Korea) is currently on hold as that team are assisting in BoB.

The problem is that we have to rely on a hint here or a nod there for much of this information, so it is no surprise that people will come to different conclusions.
I'm not saying I am right and Blackdog is wrong, but just that I have came to a different conclusion as to what is happening with the limited information that is available.

It would be nice if we could get some official clarification.

...and you say is also a very plausible direction that things could go.

The only reason i'm drawing different conclusions is the involvement of mr Denikin (mentioned by the boss no less), who is the lead systems modelling designer for SoW. After all this time we do know that systems modelling is going to a big aspect of the new simulator engine, which leads me to believe that this guy is one of the top assets of the team.

The way it clicked in my head was "why would one of their top guys be involved if it wasn't their project?", but of course you are both right in your observations as well. Who knows, maybe the guy is on "loan" to a different studio, developing the functions specific to the Moscow add on. Also, let's not forget the importance such a scenario will have for 1c's customers in their home market ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.