![]() |
Friday 2009-11-13 Screenshots AND Discussion Thread
Hello everyone,
Oleg is taking a much-needed vacation until next week. I'll do a short update for him this time. We'll focus on some of the lesser known planes that we model for Battle of Britain. All screenshots are from development tools. We're not going to do in-engine shots until Oleg is back. Note: some features in the tools are approximations. There are no waves, wakes, simplified terrain, etc. This update is just to showcase our beautiful aircraft. First off, here's the Fiat G.50 Freccia, which, as most of you should know by now, took part in the later part of the battle. It will be flyable: http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/Fiat_G-50_06.jpg http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/Fiat_G-50_08.jpg http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/Fiat_G-50_09.jpg And here's the Heinkel He 115B-2 floatplane. This plane is very rarely modeled in simulations, and never as accurately as ours. We used original manufacturing blueprints to build this model, so it's incredibly precise. This plane will be AI-only in the initial release. http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/He-115B-2_05.jpg http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/He-115B-2_06.jpg http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/He-115B-2_07.jpg Hope you guys enjoy you weekend! I will certainly enjoy mine. |
Thanks for sharing!
The Heinkel looks nice - the interior details are fantastic! I hope somebody will make a cockpit for this plane. |
Thanks Luthier. The He115B-2 looks great. Will enjoy shooting that one down!!
PPanPan |
Ilya would you have enough accurate references to build a He 115 interior/cockpit model from later? That plane is looking phantastic!
|
Thx a bunch, Ilya. You realize that you just put more emblems on my plate? Namely those of the Küstenfliegergruppen ... :-? :mrgreen:
|
re:
Thanks !! Every week, I can not wait for Friday and the new screenshots. Awesome!
|
Regarding the weathering effects we can see at those beauties, are they the final and "worst" state of weathering ?
How can we imagine the process of wastage of the entrence area of the cockpit on the upper side of wings? I suppose those effects won't process by flight time such as the wing edges or propeller blades f.e. A more specific question regarding the damage model I have. Perhaps not directly related to this friday update. As we know, planes consist of different types of materials. With different characteristics (physically). Are such characteristic values in any kind considered in the damage calculation? E.g. the heat resistance or strength durability due to forces which occur ? This could be fire of the engine which heats metal or fabric materials till the load limit is reached and the part fails to work or certain areas get damaged.Or simple collisions on the ground with objects or runway bumps, something like that... (I know that perhaps gets a bit into detail, but due to my studies I'm interested in those details. Me-262 fans would be a nice topic, but hey BoB is not Schwalbentime ;) ) |
Lovely.
|
Incredible. And people were afraid they were neglecting the planes. :)
|
Looking gooood :)
|
Looks like the BOB is going to be an easy stepping stone with Italian aircraft to move pretty quickly to a Mediterranean war theatre, Malta, Southern Italy, North Africa.
The skins are great, because we definitely don't see any pretty shiny aircraft in all the old war films. In fact, the skins could probably be taken down a few more notches. The weather and lack of quality airbases really made a mess out of the aircraft. Thanks for the update |
I'm wondering about weathering effects.
If I understood it correctly you are implementing some sort of dynamic weathering? Q: 1. Is this weathering going to be applied while the mission is playing or it will be applied between the missions? 2. Will it be possible to apply weathering effects independently on different parts of the aircraft? For example firing guns would affect guns area, but not other surfaces. P.S. If you didn't think about this feature yet, how about implementing it? :mrgreen: |
I Know it's early days yet , but in close up's I hope for a bit more interaction between the floats and the water.
Othere than that the detail of the planes is fantastic! |
Quote:
Quote:
|
the G50 looks like " 3D view "
I suppose this technology will be supported in Bob when I see the G50 on the grass , I have the dream that we will have the alteration of the tyres when you cruise on the runway and the plane which rebound on his tyres also I think that the screen of the plane on the sea could be better with multi light reflections , ( plane on the sea and sea on the plane But it's also depend of the weather) , perhaps in final release ? on the next update the boats was reflected on the sea |
Quote:
|
Thanks for posting
Hope that Oleg is having a good vacation.
Pics as good as we can hope for at this moment, hope to see a He 111 next week> Regards Viking |
nice G.50, nice skin. will be great Hurricane Vs. G.50
I cant wait to see the next series os SOW |
Quote:
|
The detail makes me wonder if the engine parts will be moving...
Well done planes. I sure hope that the damage model is improved that much as well. :) |
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...-115B-2_07.jpg
Me wants, me wants.:mrgreen: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...s/37144582.jpg |
Thanks for the friday updates oleg & luthier , things are looking very good :)
|
Thank you very much for the update.
This is starting to feel so much like the old days and I am glad to have this feeling back again. |
Word
Thanks for the update!
Word, the weathering and details of the planes are far above IL-2. I like the engine details inside of the cowl, and these aren't the in game ones. And inclusion of the he 115, the lighting looks good. It's cool there's going to be details like sunlight glints from a distance (before you get close). I suspect they will have moving engine parts, as IL-2 has the internal cooling fan of the FW 190, I remember nodding my head and giving props (proper recognition) to that, when I learned the value of F2 during engine spool up. |
Quote:
In my world the Do-17 in particular was an important plane during the Battle, and the Defiant is sure a plane that is often discussed even though it was a failure... The italians where really of minor significance (but interesting for sure!). The best would be to have them all but if we can't have them all... As the Italian cockpits are already done I'm crying for nothing I guess - but the Do-17 is really one of my personal "bad guy" favorites... /Mazex |
Mazex - there were much more hard-used aircrafts during BoB, wich will NOT be in relise...
For example Bf110C-2 and Bf110D-0/3. |
Pics not showing for me :( anybody else?
|
Quote:
Then I am really pleased that most of these are flyable, so I'm really just complaining cause I'm spoiled by the overwhelming number of flyables in IL2... With the cockpit detail of SoW we really only deserve the spit for the lousy $39 we will pay for it. Side note - while googling a bit about the 110 as you mentioned the versions you would like instead of the C4 if found this interesting fact: "The Luftwaffe had embarked on the battle with 237 serviceable Bf 110s. 223 were lost in the course of it". Talk about loss ratio! /Mazex |
I suppose Do 17 will coming in a few time after release
|
Mazex, we're all spoiled by IL-2 :mrgreen:
These planes look great! I can already see I'll have a good time flying with the G.50. And that Heinkel - amazing!! I'll be sure to take my time testing it's damage model under .303 fire. C'mon, it isn't my evil geniuous talking here, it's a scientific report on the resistance of the materials used in an aircraft! Science, not just a cheap excuse to blow things up (it's a bit comparable to the way the Mythbusters do it). I have a silly question related to languages: will users be able to choose between the languages? |
Quote:
looks like the site is down |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It must have been a fairly hard call by the developers. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You forgot this one I believe: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=151 JV |
Quote:
|
Thank you Foo'bar!
|
Quote:
No more seriously, my guess is that the three Italian machines could be used to build quickly other nice theaters with little effort, such as Greece, or North Africa 1940. Just guessing. Regards, Insuber |
I figure they just want to be more thorough than sims of the past. Most people don't even think of the Italian contribution which makes their inclusion all the more interesting.
________ Jailbroken |
Quote:
Quote:
Bf110 C-2 - 359 aircrafts built, Bf110 C-4 - 155 aircrafts built, Bf110 C-5 - 100 aircrafts built, Bf110 C-6 - 12 aircrafts built, Bf110 C-7 - 39 aircrafts built, Bf110 D-0 - 83 aircrafts built,. Bf110 D-0/D-1 - 21 aircrafts built, Bf110 D-0/D-3 - 12 aircrafts built, Bf110 D-0/D-4 - 6 aircrafts built, Bf110 D-2 - 73 aircrafts built, Bf110 D-3 - 254 aircrafts built, P.S. Tell me please, what Geschwader of Luftwaffe was the first who got 500 air-to-air victories, and when it happened? |
Quote:
But it is an interesting fact that the 110 actually did not have that bad K/D ratio (when I talked ratio it was more from the number deployed/number destroyed). But if the cautious 110:s where in a defensive circle or high above and the the Heinkels continued their bombing approach defended on close range by the 109:s - who should the RAF pilots focus on? Then a 110 could dive down to get a kill but it did not really affect the battle in the same way as the 109:s... Just guessing. |
With regards to Italian aircraft, although they were rare in the battle, when someone is in the store casually browsing through the game section, they see a nice Battle of Britain packaging, with a couple Italian planes on the back. That someone's eyes are going to go wide, because they never imagined Italy had any part in that battle at all, and the sheer curiosity will tip them off the fence into buying it. :)
I think that within a year we will get our Do-17s, Defiants, Bf-110 variants, etc. So have no fear: http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/wp-conten...t20mk-i_06.jpg http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/wp-content/do-215_1_1.jpg http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/wp-content/do1720rap.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BTW, in Foo'bar's page, we can see additional 3 pictures, taken from KAG's forum :)
|
Quote:
|
OT?
|
Hey I was surfing net and found this one:
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4503/grab0004h.jpg Nice one!!! |
Ilya,
The G.50bis Freccia looks amazingly detailed, and the skin + weathering is quite realistic. The heavy discoloration pattern behind the pit is seen in actual photos of the time of CAI (Corpo Aereo Italiano). The model quality is already very good for a still picture, shadow, lighting and all, even more if we consider that it will be a real time simulation ... I'm quite afraid now about the framerate, but I really prefer to have a complex sim now and wait a little bit for new more powerful h/w. Ins |
I'm really looking forward to hearing more about the new damage model, both visual and not so visual.
________ IOLITE VAPORIZER REVIEW |
Quote:
|
|
Cool :)
I know for my part I gonna fly the 115 and ONLY the 115!! It looks great apart for some small modelling errors but you can't have it all... Here is my own 115 at work. http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...ils_115_BW.jpg |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.