Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   no friday update today??? (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18667)

mazex 02-12-2011 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 223010)
TY...the 5670?? really??...not a good card.

Yes to that is really good news actually ;) That it even runs on a 5670 with what looks like good fps over water is a good sign... I mean looking at the review I posted ( http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...t-crossfire/15 ) you can see that a 5670 has half the FPS of my old GTX275 that I only keep to see how bad it runs CoD ;) And having an FPS of just 15 in a DX10 game like Crysis would look just silly - but 32 that the GTX275 gets is rather OK and fully playable. That would do wonders to these videos. Then look at the "real" cards and imagine CoD on them instead!

The info on that this is on a real budget card that is even worse than what my 70 old mother has should be updated in the thread title so we dont get the "wtf - this sucks so bad, look at the fps over that silly round island. First the wrong color of the trim wheel of the Spit and now this! I will not buy it! Never!"... etc ;) Come to think of it I have to tell my mother she will be able to run it - she has been strafed by a 109 IRL so we can ask her of tracer color :) Unfortunately she was two and my grandmother that would be able to tell died last year (getting rather far off topic now ;))

Kikuchiyo 02-12-2011 07:18 AM

I'm more wondering if it was an issue with the video card, or more of an issue with the CPU. I am running a 4th gen dual core, and honestly hearing the low FPS that is occurring with a quad core in the test machine is getting me a bit worried. I know I have the game covered with my ATI 5870 as far as graphics go, but really worried about the 3 ghz dual core not having the computing power to run the sim effectively. I trust the visuals to be close enough to real life at mid to high settings, but hope I don't have to have a real monster CPU to fully handle the number crunching without turning a lot of stuff down.

Foo'bar 02-12-2011 07:23 AM

Good to see an evidence about both the He 59 and He 115 made it into the initial release.

T-JETTer 02-12-2011 07:31 AM

video from Kiev`s CoD presentation. 11.02.11
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBFL6...layer_embedded

More videos here:
http://www.uaf.kiev.ua/forum/index.php?showtopic=927

Qpassa 02-12-2011 07:41 AM

bf109 of the raf, this is the traitor ? :D
CLIFFS OF DOVER STEAM?
http://www.uaf.kiev.ua/forum/index.p...indpost&p=5994

JG52Uther 02-12-2011 08:04 AM

Great video's thanks for posting!

meplay 02-12-2011 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T-JETTer (Post 223072)

Tracers and smoke look good!

Tvrdi 02-12-2011 08:36 AM

streljajete streljajete :-) ahh cant wait

ChrisDNT 02-12-2011 09:04 AM

I really like this :

"All planes are much more sluggish than in IL-2"

Aircrafts flying like the real thing, in the "Eric Brows's joystick settings" way, great !

Hecke 02-12-2011 09:10 AM

hm, the ground effects and smoke don't look up to the rest.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.