![]() |
Whats up?
Ah AoA trolling again. *grab me a beer and watch the show* |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
the constant meaningless interference by a few is a major part of what has made this forum nearly unusable as a constructive place to exchange information. being in a communal place does not equate with the right to urinate on the carpet whenever you feel like it, and ignoring the "common good of the group" is where the problem lies Quote:
|
Quote:
Just wanted to get a feel as for what people like furbs expect.. In that I fear the exptations are allreayd set so high that no amount of fixes or additions will make everyone happy.. But I digresss.. It appear that BS has allready stated what I was trying to say, i.e. Quote:
Why have Luither write up the pending 'readme' prior to the work being done? Nuff said on this imho Your milage may vary |
What I see here in the forum in general is different people asking the same (valid or not) questions again and again, even some of them are already answered.
May I propose that you Black Six collect and condense these same (20ish or so) key questions to one solid highly visible sticky thread and cleary communicate with mods that no already stated question are allowed to be posted. At least I suffer a lot glansing these forums reading same (and often whiney) questions again and again. The more relevant content are clouded by this unneccesary repetition. Just my two cents... |
Quote:
Well, the response was bad news for offline flyers like myself since the game runs pretty smooth already, so it was good to know. The patch won't do much for the offline experience, so on the shelf it will stay....again. It's funny how far we have to lower the bar when "expectations are set so high" to be able to have a enjoyable offline experience a year after purchase. |
Quote:
Firstly, let me say I'm unlucky like all of you (the dev team as well for sure...) but this course of action is absolutely understandable (from my point of view and I'm a dev as well) I guess they want to ensure that they have sorted out the graphics issues and then they can look after the other problems. Maybe things are already prepared... Imagine: We put all together CTD fix, graphic performance, FM, DM, ... and then problems occurs. They/You/One will never ever be able to sort them out. So, it is not the best news, but I stay optimistic. Have a nice weekend pilots and dev team! |
Well, I found more info in this thread than the patch one unless I missed something in it.
I now have some hope the patch will be here soon and at least make MP more playable, without the ctd's I also enjoy SP but the axis bomber issues are a problem as are the radio commands. Co-op fixes would be very nice also. And I hate to admit it but I play BF3 on default ultra settings and do not even turn anything down to play online(waiting on Arma 3). So the graphics rewrite is a good sign. Thanks for the info in this thread, good stuff mostly. |
I'm looking forward to the graphics update.... and to the expanded sound hopefully in the second beta ;) At least bugfixing of the minor problems. Like Luther stated a while ago: changing a lever just takes 3-5 minutes. Therefore there would be a huge list of (minor) fixes accomplished during the last couple of months! *fingers crossed*
|
I had hoped the performance patch would include other fixes, but I do understand its better to test the performance issues first before introducing other fixes which could make the fixing and testing more complicated.
You have to think that the sequel won't be out for sometime, which should allow plenty of time for another patch with some fixes for the AI, Commands, etc etc. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.