Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Priority bugs & other issues that need to be looked into (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=23405)

335th_GRAthos 06-02-2011 11:26 AM

I have something, I do not know whether it deserves to be put on the "bucket list" so if others think it is a worthwhile improvement please comment so.

Have an option to disallow the "nearest enemy external view" (the shift/ctrl-F2 option which shows your plane relative to the enemy).

Due to the great graphics of the game it is a real pity for those flying "full real" not being able to enjoy the nice views. But in most servers people prohibit external views because especially the "nearest enemy external view" gives an unrealistic advantage during dogfight.


It is just an idea, do not add it yet to the list before we can see if others share the same view.

~S~

furbs 06-02-2011 12:08 PM

As would "no outside view unless dead".

klem 06-02-2011 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 292220)
Mods...about time this was a sticky.

He said the 'M' word.

Are we really going to go down the IL-2 1946/UP3 "lets split the community" route or is this 'M' something else?

ATAG_Dutch 06-02-2011 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by klem (Post 292343)
He said the 'M' word.

Are we really going to go down the IL-2 1946/UP3 "lets split the community" route or is this 'M' something else?

Think he means for the forum MODerators to make the thread a 'sticky'.:)

Trooper117 06-02-2011 02:00 PM

Mods is not a dirty word..
If we were all presented with a realistic sound mod that covered the whole rpm range, and didn't interfere with online integrity, 99.9% of us would gladly use it..

Vengeanze 06-02-2011 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper117 (Post 292368)
Mods is not a dirty word..

Nope, it ain't. Tried it in bed just now but didn't do anything to the missus. :(

Trooper117 06-02-2011 02:39 PM

Try giving her the maximum amount of revs mate..

Vengeanze 06-02-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trooper117 (Post 292396)
Try giving her the maximum amount of revs mate..

I'm +40. That would break a piston or sum. No good. 4psi MAXIMUM. I'll do 1800 with coarse/lean for about an hour. Dunno about her but that'll get me where I'm going. :rolleyes:

Got some 100 octane bluepills that'll let me go into wep but that's for special occasions. ;-)

CH_RoadDogg 06-02-2011 03:33 PM

The ability to land and rearm/gas up take off again would be nice.

Blackdog_kt 06-02-2011 05:47 PM

I agree about making the gunsights usable, but i disagree with disabling the head movement range restriction because it's actually not about the head alone but the pilot's whole body.

Maybe just redo it in a more realistic manner as it tries to simulate a very real constraint:
either tighten your straps and have a solid sight picture without bouncing around in high G maneuvers, or loosen your straps and trade stability of vision for the ability to turn your body around more within the cockpit and get better SA.

The easiest way to fix this is to copy the RoF method and just let the player set a custom center viewpoint for each aircraft.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.