Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update, January 27, 2012 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=29368)

Sternjaeger II 01-27-2012 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 385039)
The link does not work any more but I have quotes from that thread here http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...postcount=1131

Jason says that all the malcontents and whiners did too much damage to their project. And I know that they moderate their forums much more strictly than 1C.

yeah but then again that's nothing new. You will always have whiners, you need to sell to generate income and finance R&D. I mean, guys, these are the basics of business.

At least they're working on a development and delivery format which is efficient and steadily releasing updates and new planes. Their formula works, in a sector that it's even more niche than this one.

pupo162 01-27-2012 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ataros (Post 385039)
The link does not work any more but I have quotes from that thread here http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...postcount=1131

Jason says that all the malcontents and whiners did too much damage to their project. And I know that they moderate their forums much more strictly than 1C.

"
@mods & all
Let's make sure Luthier or his successor does not have to post the same 3 messages here in 2013. This is our responsibility to stop usual local saboteurs. ¡No pasarán!"

using a "¡No pasarán!" whilst asking mods for a better done censure on the state of the game its hilarious.


regarding ROF, i feel sorry for the guys. i have bought 10 euros of ROF stuff this sale, very good stuff. but their selling method is just plain bad. i would have bought more and sooner if they sole it in a dvd as everyone else.

tumu 01-27-2012 10:47 AM

thx for update.

We want all photos you can post! hahahahhahahahah.

nice MOSCA whit big cannons!

thx

Drum_tastic 01-27-2012 10:49 AM

My humble opinion is, regardless of whether some in the community like the situation or not, we have to take on board what the devs are telling us and just let them get on with it, they are the ones in control. Why worry about something that we, as punters, cannot control.

I have to admit I am very disappointed with Clod, I spent £50 on something that I never play, because ultimately it is not in a playable condition yet.

However, I do have faith that the team are doing their best to try and fix it, as surely this is in their interests too.
When they have been able to get it running as is should run I will be back to hopefully play a sim I have been waiting for years to be born!

Have a good weekend all.

bongodriver 01-27-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gravy (Post 385047)
To be fair its not really the update we wanted is it, Ok its a WIP shot of a plane from BOM, but the update for Cliff Of dover looks very bleak which is after all why we are all here. The update says to me that they have no idea when they are going to be able to fix the game that they released some 10 months ago, its ready whens its ready is not very encouraging im my opinion. But there is other stuff to do its just dissappointing thats all.

I don't believe the devs are going to abandon COD if they want to sell a sequel, simple logic, they have to have COD working because it's going to be the engine that runs the sequel.

Sternjaeger II 01-27-2012 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 385041)
it seems whatever Luthier does he's damned, people have been whining for updates, they get them and immediately use the opportunity do do more whining......

bongo, when I read that it takes a year or more to develop one plane, I just can't think of Maddox Games as an efficient team, sorry.

Again, I'm not questioning the skills of the people involved, I'm wondering if you realise that once you take out of the equation all the things that might affect such a slow progress, the only two options left are improper resource managing and still working on an unstable game coding.

bongodriver 01-27-2012 10:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger II (Post 385049)
bongo, when I read that it takes a year or more to develop one plane, I just can't think of Maddox Games as an efficient team, sorry.

Again, I'm not questioning the skills of the people involved, I'm wondering if you realise that once you take out of the equation all the things that might affect such a slow progress, the only two options left are improper resource managing and still working on an unstable game coding.

and the whinging helps how? other than making some very immature people feel better.

Feathered_IV 01-27-2012 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi (Post 385016)
Also if CoD is so crap why are the RoF and CoD multiplayer numbers so comparable both game have around 50 ppl playing them.. Now I can understand why CoD has low numbers but then surely if RoF is soo much better it should have more ppl online...


Rof's single player experience is outstanding.

JG52Krupi 01-27-2012 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 385051)
and the whinging helps how? other than making some very immature people feel better.

+1 watch out bongo in a min he's going to take a stab at you for being British and saying that bob was the most important battle of ww2 :rolleyes: even though you never did

JG52Krupi 01-27-2012 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Feathered_IV (Post 385052)
Rof's single player experience is outstanding.

Agreed, head and shoulders above cod


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.