Angels advocate? ;)

What is your opinion of people in the armor of knights with lance on a horse of King Arthur legend paraded though the stadium?

What about HMS Victory, or a model of, was also showcased?

what about the Lancaster of BBMF fly over?

Ah, I understand. The nightmare to those who survived, and yes, I agree that it is mean to open old wounds...

Unfortunately it is the nature of man to do incredibly cruel things to each other for all manner of reasons (and not just intentional! We build houses in the path of destruction). Evil will happen, people will be hurt (physically and emotionally), but we have to move on and live. The only hope we have is to tell the future to avoid their mistakes.

The Vulcan is the perfect messenger. It is a beautiful and awesome aircraft, but that angel also trumpets a message of destruction to those who dare to hurt peaceful people, and is a VISUAL reminder not to allow the mistakes of the past repeats themselves.

Just a side note:
Did the Vulcan ever directly kill someone? Best I recall it was only a tanker during the Falklands war.

I see that you, very conveniently, have put yourself on the “peaceful” side. A view not necessary shared by all.

But now back on topic: During the Malvinas conflict the Vulcan's bombed the Argentinian airfield, if anyone died I don't know but I guess that was the intention. The tankers you refer to where the Victor bombers/tankers.

Viking

Wasn't it the airfield in Falkland?

World Factbook; 'Although first sighted by an English navigator in 1592, the first landing (English) did not occur until almost a century later in 1690, and the first settlement (French) was not established until 1764. The colony was turned over to Spain two years later and the islands have since been the subject of a territorial dispute, first between Britain and Spain, then between Britain and Argentina. The UK asserted its claim to the islands by establishing a naval garrison there in 1833. Argentina invaded the islands on 2 April 1982. The British responded with an expeditionary force that landed seven weeks later and after fierce fighting forced an Argentine surrender on 14 June 1982.'

Except for the weeks Falkland was occupied, Argentinia has never held Falklands, Argentinia got their independence from Spain in 1816.

Yes, held and claimed by the Argentinians at that time.

Viking

During the Falklands conflict, the Vulcans bombed the runway at Stanley Airport in order that Argentinian fast jets could not use it. Then they used Shrike missiles to take out radar facilities.
The Victor's sole purpose was as a tanker by this time.

Ah, thats right. The Victor's where used to refuel the Vulcan's, who took off from UK.

Reading up on the situation regarding the five attacks on Port Stanley during “Thatchers War” I find that the Argentinians state that two where killed and two injured. And one hole in the runway, easily patched up the next day.

So that is the final score for this war-bird. Not sure whether that is a success or a failure for the UK taxpayers money.

Viking

Long Mission
 

The Vulcans and Victors first flew from RAF stations in the UK (Marham and Waddington I think) to Ascension Island's Wideawake Airfield, midway between Brazil and Congo in the Mid Atlantic.
The 'Black Buck' missions were launched from there.
It took eleven Victor Tankers to get one Vulcan from Ascension Island to the Falklands.
In the first mission, only one 500kg bomb hit the runway, but it was enough to prevent it being used by Argentina's fast jets.
That's a lot of fuel and aircraft to get one bomb on a runway!
Thankfully, the US helped in providing the UK with fuel and other logistics.
The book 'Vulcan 607' by Rowland White, published by Corgi, is excellent.

Viking, you lack a long term global perspective.

You cherry pick your facts to suit your personal agenda.

Would you be happier in a Russian Communist dominated Europe?

Would you even be able to post on a site like this.

Think man.