The same with FM, historical performance of planes and DM for me as online player.

Nice graphic and good fps is not enough for me to play these game.

I see potential in these game like 2 years ago i saw it in ROF with initialy relase ( plenty of bugs, bad performacne etc). ROF team make their homework since these time and now i could enjoy these game ( beside long range accuracy shoting and effectivnes of gunners :P )

Im sure that 1C is able to do the same with CloD if they will want to do it. I still have some hope that they will exploit potential of these game and dont waste their chance.

For those asking about Coo-ops I think Luthier as made it quiet clear that the dev's dont seem to think that there is any problem, so it seems that this issue will not be addressed.

Yeah, the idea is to adapt and advance! :D

S!

Orville, my favorite in CoD is Me110 at the moment so not the hottest rod in the inventory :) I just think that there will be a fundamental work done to the FM if 100 octane would implemented. People should not just expect that the Rotol Hurricane would be even better or Sissyfire II became Mk.Vb or IX with the boost ;)

I wish this new IL-2 series would stay clear from the "features" it had in the original one and really focus on accuracy within the game engine limits. If not then we will have the same ordeal in our hands as with the original one when BoM comes etc. I remember Oleg and his team said in beginning of creating CoD that they had learned a lot from IL-2 and will put that into effect with this new title..so let's hope so will also happen :)

Anyways..good weekend to all :)

If the code already has the ability, it doesn`t need to. Online wars weren`t created by 1C either. All we need is the SDK and serious community input and we`ll be okay.

But to achieve that, we need to make this game stable and have good enough performance to play for your average virtual pilot Joe first.

I mean to have a list of the new/updated sounds.

@ B6, From a customer point of view - A real problem we have continusly had so far with beta tests is being given a beta with content "A" in it, and then when it comes down to the Release Candidate or Offical patch it has content "A" & "B" and a whole host of extra bugs because they were not spotted by the community as they didnt experience the beta with "B" content.

I remain in hope that the development management have seen that it would be more benefical to have content "A" & "B" as RC seprate patches.

Hehehe, of course and agreed. I have to say I don't know anyone who does think or expect that though, myself included, to be fair. :)

Have a good weekend too. :)

True. As long as they don't upgrade the 109 model before they upgrade the Spitfires I'll wait.

The biggest thing keeping a lot of guys from flying CoD is game/graphics performance/CTD. Fix that so more guys can play and we'll be on the up.

I know, I know... GUI, offline play, radio commands, FMB etc.. I believe it will all come, much of it is 'core' stuff that will be needed for the sequel.

Here's an irony, if the graphics update makes online playable while offline continues to be a problem, come and join us online. Exchange radio commands for real-time Teamspeak :)

btw, thanks BlackSix.

The gaming reality is that most people will not be able to use the advantage that comes with certain types/field mods of aircraft. Those that shout the most about such changes end up being shot down the same as it always was.

People are having issues with tunnel vision...

The graphics engine re-write should fix alot more than just stutters, it should fix other stuff like CTDs. Not saying it will fix all, but lets see how the next patch shakes out and go from there.

As for the other stuff, a perfect FM does nothing if you are flying in a slideshow over London :)

Asking them to write what it will address or should address would be virtual suicide, specially on this forum, if one of those things they stated didnt work out as planned... gawd help the mods here lol...