Originally Posted by Xilon_x (Post 191465)

basterebbe come punto di referimento il-2 sturmovik 1946 e analizzare cosa manca cosa si puo' migliorare e cosa si puo' aggiungere come nuova idea ma soprattutto come puo' essere migliorata la giocabilita' online dato che tutto il mondo partecipa a un conflitto virtuale.
BoB dovrebbe esere un ottimo simulatore ma deve avere dei collegamenti che permettano di poterlo ulteriormente migliorare e sviluppare ne corso degli anni che verrano.
la cosa molto importante e che un aereo si comporti come un aereo e non come un ufo rispettando le leggi della fisica terrestre
bastano poche cose pochi aerei ma ignorare i comportamenti della fisica mi sembra sbagliato.
Ad esempio il-2 gli aerei che vanno sugli alberi non esplodono
gli incendi non si divagano i fumi vanno dritti verso l'alto un aereo incendiato che sta nel mare non si spegne ma sparisce.
questa e una mio pensiero sul nuovo simulatore non e' una critica so che OLEG MADDOX e un esperto e so che a lui piacciono molto gli aerei e il volo.
Grazie signor Oleg Maddox.



suffice as a point of reference at IL-2 Sturmovik 1946 and analyze what is missing something you can 'improve and what you can' add as a new idea but also how it can 'be improved gameplay' online as part of a worldwide virtual conflict.
BoB should exercise a great mortgage, but must have links that allow it to be further improved and developed it over the years to come.
The very important thing and that a plane behaves like a plane and not a UFO while respecting the laws of terrestrial physics
Just a few things a few planes but ignore the behavior of physics seems to me wrong.
For example, the-2 aircraft that are on the trees do not explode
fires are not amusing touches the fumes go straight to the top of an airplane that is burned into the sea off but not gone.
My thoughts on this and a new mortgage and do not 'know that a critical Oleg Maddox and an expert and I know him really like airplanes and flying.
Thank you, Mr. Oleg Maddox.

Originally Posted by mungee (Post 191463)

You tell 'em Oleg!! Hehe! I have no doubt that SoW will "set the bar" for many years to come.

Just something I need to ask you Oleg - I fear that it may already have been answered before ... if it has, I'm sorry!

It's the AI that SoW will have - in IL-2 one's squadron/section often/usually leaves one way behind in spite of one trying to maintain a gradual and reasonably fast ascent - not wanting to test the ol' Merlin too much before she overheats!!

In SoW will the AI and the individual player's airctaft be "closer" performance-wise. I understand that the AI in IL-2 was near-perfect (perfect trim etc) and that's why guys like me couldn't keep up!

Keep up the graet work - it gives so many of us so much pleasure! It must really make you feel good!

Originally Posted by Spudkopf (Post 191475)

How's the boy, is he feeling better yet has he lost his temperature?

Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox (Post 191481)

Its Ok, thanks, but I personally have no time at the moment to sit near him to play.
I just did for him several new simple missions where he can win with his entry level experience :).

Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 190268)

Oleg, I too, flew over England this year and Furbs' shot is an accurate representation of the colours of the English landscape. I am not trying to be rude, but have you flown over England? I think, perhaps, we may be able to judge the best. Obviously as you say a camera won't give a 100% accurate representation, but from experience I think those of us who live in the country can give a good idea of how it looked.
The colours currently shown for SoW suggest a spring-look, where the fields are quite a lush green. In the summer of 1940, it was one of the hottest summers' on record, and the fields would have had a burnished look.
I do understand your theories of colour though; it will differen between each PC, but this is just my observation ;)



Winny, there weren't rape-fields in England in 1940. I know you weren't saying there are, but I'm just pointing it out. It's interesting to compare a modern-day picture with one from 1940.

Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox (Post 190271)

Yes I was in England say about 20 times and have a lot of my own photos, including from the air that I did myself.

Originally Posted by T.}{.O.R. (Post 190518)

Who said anything about no protection at all?

I am just saying, and many people will and do agree with me - that what RoF had at the beginning was a mistake. And the fact you have to pay for every additional plane? Thats just rubbish.

A bad decision like this can kill the sales. Just like it was with the last Silent Hunter. Fortunately for RoF players, they came to their senses and now the game can be played offline. I won't even go into 'the release without the dedicated server debacle'...

Originally Posted by speculum jockey (Post 190632)

Dear Xilon_x, if spaghetti not have the tomato is negative.
Tomatoes are important factor to Italian food.
EXAMPLE look of tomato.
SPAGHETTI not exist if not have Tomato.
Tomato cooked or raw.
http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5...tolydecker.jpg

Spaghetti pot
http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9153/pastapot300.jpg

oven control amount and intensity of heat.

**back to normal**

You just called Oleg Maddox an idiot! Not directly, but you just explained to a guy making a flight simulator that WIND IS IMPORTANT! Then you went on to explain that gliders need wind to fly. Maybe next you could tell him how to dress himself or tie his shoes. I'm sure he'd appreciate that as well.

Originally Posted by philip.ed (Post 190761)

http://www.condorsoaring.com/media/s...ts/scndr01.jpg

The clouds here look awesome.

Originally Posted by Oleg Maddox (Post 191481)

Its Ok, thanks, but I personally have no time at the moment to sit near him to play.
I just did for him several new simple missions where he can win with his entry level experience :).