Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Friday 2010-10-15 Dev. update and Discussion (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=16964)

Sutts 10-18-2010 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baron (Post 190892)
Seriously, some of u people need to take a biig step back and start living.


Jesus H.....


Edit: from another forum, im suprised noone has commentet on the wrong type of rooftiling used in olegs screens. Im sure though someone will be here shortly doing just that. Flight sim community just blows my mind over and over again. (not in a good way mind u)


With respect, these things are a lot more obvious than a darn roofing slate. They literally shout MODERN TECHNOLOGY BELOW.

Now, it may not seem important to many but just wait until people start producing the historically accurate movies that Oleg hinted at. It was bad enough watching Memphis Belle with all those modern fields in the background. If Oleg has a chance to make the environment historically correct then I think he will choose to do it, I don't care when.

ATAG_Dutch 10-18-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insuber (Post 190891)
So we have here:

- experts of WWII fields
- experts of BOB country colors
- experts of RAF flight goggles
- experts of flight suits
- experts of clouds (not so many thou ... :))
- experts of 110 antennas
- experts of locomotives
- ... I can continue ...

Chapeau ... personally I just want an honest combat flight simulation and I feel so lonely ! Hey anyone else out there like me ?

;D

Yep.

WTE_Galway 10-18-2010 11:12 PM

Just an observation as a former freelance photographer.

Many of the photos people are preferring as "more correct" have clearly been taken with a polarized lens. Polarised lenses with landscape photos give a more dramatic result. From an observers point of view the effect on the image is similar to putting on a pair of high quality sunglasses on a sunny day.

ATAG_Dutch 10-18-2010 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 190902)
A small comparison with WoP that has been mentioned here (got in a bit too low and some guy in a spit joined my 2 player host while going on my photo run and shot me down so no second attempt ;))

It's getting hard to say which one is best now...

I don't think it is.

Just look at the aircraft.
Then look at the water.
Then look at the towns.
Then look at the overall 'mood' of the shots.

The blokes at 1c Maddox games will produce the goods.
As I said earlier, given the news we've been given this week, it's too late for comparisons or recommendations for the initial release.
We're on the home stretch.
Have a bit of faith, and remember the initial release is only the initial release.
If recommendations and comparisons are necessary after release, so be it.
That's what the forum is for.

I'm really looking forward to the next ten years, when all these 'games' that the screenshots have been compared to have all been forgotten, and we'll all be wondering why on earth we moaned.

Like Insuber said, we just want a good combat flight sim.

I think we're going to get a terrific one.

Foo'bar 10-18-2010 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Insuber (Post 190891)
So we have here:

(...)
- experts of locomotives
(...)

Err... more than me? ;)

Chivas 10-19-2010 01:46 AM

I'm blown away by the thought of the developer actually saying they're modeling all of 1940 London.

lbuchele 10-19-2010 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foo'bar (Post 190916)
Err... more than me? ;)

Sorry,Foo' bar.
I don't consider you an expert in locomotives.
You are god.

KG26_Alpha 10-19-2010 04:14 AM

Another God is the person who has done the weather modelling :)

airmalik 10-19-2010 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazex (Post 190902)
A small comparison with WoP that has been mentioned here (got in a bit too low and some guy in a spit joined my 2 player host while going on my photo run and shot me down so no second attempt ;))

It's getting hard to say which one is best now...

I was curious what WoP would look like without the colour cast:

Original:
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/3022/wopcompare2.jpg

Colour Corrected (Only colour balance changed. No contrast, exposure changes made):
http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7...compare2cc.jpg

Oleg Maddox 10-19-2010 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WTE_Galway (Post 190910)
Just an observation as a former freelance photographer.

Many of the photos people are preferring as "more correct" have clearly been taken with a polarized lens. Polarised lenses with landscape photos give a more dramatic result. From an observers point of view the effect on the image is similar to putting on a pair of high quality sunglasses on a sunny day.

I would add - polarized sunglasses :)
Yes you are perfectly right. Not all but many was done by this way if it was professional photograper.
In my photos that I was shooting from the air myself I didn't use polarizer, however in a soft I was removing the effect what is doing the glass of windows and canopy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.