![]() |
It's like Il-2 in its heyday, with better graphics. CEM enthusiasts will need to look elsewhere however.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks. |
Quote:
MAC |
Quote:
MAC |
Seems a case of calling post-processing "good graphics." I don't care for the look, and I AM a graphics junkie. I take to simulation about as well as a brick takes to water. In my IL2 days, I used to joke that you always knew when the battle started: I was already a spectator.
|
War thunder has very poor in Damage model.
War thunder may look good but When playing, I found that it has very poor Damage Model. Damage model is not the area which can be enhanced easily. I don't want to play it.
I believe both CLOD and War thunder will be enhaced later but I guess I'll stand at CLOD side. |
The prop animation is worse than Clodo's. Didn't think that was possible.
RedToo. |
1 Attachment(s)
Well these graphics look pretty nice but if you look here and in other shots it seems that they have made a weird error on the 109 canopy the angle going up on the side looks too steep. Too straight up and down if you will and too wide at the top.
|
Quote:
- If it is nowhere near the real size of Southern England + the Channel + NW France then I cannot agree that it is better "in all aspects". |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.