I hope you're ready for a lengthy reply (I do appologize for the length, but felt it important to address your points).

Exhibit A: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...3&postcount=29
Furthermore, Exhibit B (from the same post)
When you use someone's nationality as a reason to make a personal attack, that my friend, is Nation-Bashing. If you don't like the term "Nation-Bashing", then how does Bigot & Bigotry suit you?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You were hardly bashed for it. He disagreed and made an appropriately, albet sarcastic, reply. He still had/has a valid point, and he most certainly has not carried on in the immature manner you have.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have read all the posts, from page, from post 1. Started it wasn't until page 3 (today) that you started posting in here and became abusive. So, what came before is completely irrelevant my post's subject was on your conduct in this thread.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting, I remember making no prophecies. *shrugs*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I believe, even without this reply, my previous post is well substantiated by your own previous posts...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit C: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...3&postcount=29
You may not have literally said you would kick his arse all over Duxford, but that is still a threat. Veiled though it may be. If make it clear the Moon is made of cheese, that doesn't mean it actually is. Or perhaps this makes more sense, if I make it clear the Moon is not made of rock that doesn't mean it actually isn't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is one of my more favored lines of your previous reply.
I believe you refer to Feuer's post here: http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...2&postcount=28
The use of the adjective "simple" was used to describe the term "claim". Not YOU. So, hopefully that little issue is all cleared up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Because I also replied to your points concerning 409b. Furthermore, if the other points in my post (concerning your behavior), were not relevant then likewise every post you made since you started after Feuer (including the previous one) had nothing to do with it either. But I assume it's okay for to bring up irrelevant subjects, but not anyone else.

So, we'll all go on stay on topic now, but you can go ahead and talk about whatever. So far, in your reply to my post, you've actually not addressed any of my points that were on topic, thus your previous reply actually has nothing to do with this topic at all. Atleast some of mine did. Hypocracy much?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, not at all, only pointing out things most people consider common sense. Which, in of itself, is hardly slanderous.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Didn't you know? There is no freedom of speech on the internet? There is no bill of rights. I do agree with the sentiment though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

I couldn't agree more with the first line of this quote (reference my comment directly preceeding this one). As far as preachers go, you're right, there are many. Many of various demoninations and religions. Good luck trying to navigate life without running into a few.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No worries, I already have. You are obviously bothered. Otherwise, why offer your rebuttal to my previous post? Also, dont blame the site. It is obviously just behaving as it was coded to do based on human input.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cool-beans. In the event of legal action. I highly recommend NOT using it as a defense in litigation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

You're absolutely correct. I'm merely basing my perspective on your posting behavior. Which by themselves makes it fairly difficult to refute my previous points because, well, they're there in black and white. Furthermore, the statement you are refering to is also another one of the common sense rules that most people are aware of.

They keep crawling out of the woodwork!!!!

Whats the final release going to give you that the beta does not other then dedicated server? You can fly the beta all day long if you like and the experience will be the same as the final release. If you really want to breathe some life back in your game you should consider some of the fine modifications out.

S!

Oleg is very serious about cheats for ONLINE play. If you go to the AAA site and look around you'll see there are large numbers of MODS for 4.09. The AAA ONLINE server is supporting the 4.09 stuff. Oleg may have decided to just walk away at this point and leave everyone to the care of the IL2 community of users and modders.

There also may be real issues for providing a NON-CHEAT ONLINE environment that just might not be possible now that there are so many 4.09 MODS available. 4.08 could very well be the end of it as far as keeping cheaters off the lobby.that is, if Oleg has washed his hands of IL2 series.

Just a speculation of course. I thought of this, because Oleg has never lingered with a partial patch release.

no sovien , it looks like the post that started this off by where Feuerfalke addressed me as being simple has been removed. it was not in reference to where your link goes, but it was a direct attack on my personality by directly calling me "simple",
as for the rest of your quotes, this just goes to prove that you are the type of person that likes to keep trouble going. maybe you have been reported for this very reason?????????
ever heard the expression let sleeping dogs lye ?
if it was such an issue to Feuerfalke, then it would be him making all the quotes, and as it was left by himself and me then it would have suggested that any issues where sorted. pm's are a wonderfull thing you know.
but you seem to want to keep it going, and keep something going that has absolutely NOTHING to do with you.
get of your horse and drink ur milk mate. and keep out of things that have nothing to do with you eh.

i would just like to add that AAA are also very serious about cheats online, and ban anyone that tries to promote them. :grin:

Well THAT should certainly put an end to it... :)

First, this is a public forum and as such all members can freely reply to any post...yes, even the one's that have nothing to do with them. In other words, I don't need your permission or blessing to do so. If you dont want any Joe Shmoe replying to your posts then don't post on a public forum.

Second, if pm's are such a wonderful thing to you then you should have kept this debate to the pm's instead of replying to my post. If you chose to post a reply to mine, you should expect the same in turn. Your pride was hurt and you wanted to make an attempt to save face - so you posted instead of keeping it to the pm's. So why should you expect any different?

Third, in response to the one point you offered a rebuttal on (The "Simple" conspiracy): The quote and the link speak for themselves. You are wrong. You want it to be Feuer called you "simple" because your reaching and reaching for something to attack him over. Simple understanding of the English language provides clear indication this was not the intent (as in this case, "simple understanding" was also not used as an adjective to describe you as a person).

Fourth, I honestly could careless if Feuer is offended - Feuer can defend himself. I didn't post to "come to his aid". I thought your post lacked tact. Lacked so much tact I felt it was worth addressing.

Fifth, as far as milk is concerned, as long as it has a healthy dose of chocolate mixed in I will be more then happy to drink it.

In closing, all of my previous points still stand. If you'd like to continue this discussion in pm's I'd be more then happy to do so. As matter of fact, I replied to the pm you sent me (after posting your first reply to my first post), but you have failed to keep this debate in the pm's. I really thought that's were they would stay, but now I'm really not surprised in the least that you just couldn't resist replying in the thread. I sincerely hope you enjoyed another spoonful of Hypocracy.

I await your response in my pm's (you still have yet to reply to my initial reply to your first and only pm to me).

Peace-out. Homie.

This Thread Has Been Hijaked Warning Warning Will Robinson.
 

This Thread Has Been Hijaked Warning Warning Will Robinson.