Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Page 5 of 7

« First

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)

- IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)

- - calm down (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=32774)

carguy_

06-23-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ed-b (Post 437040)

I'm putting this one down to experience. I won't be back and I won't be buying 1C software again. I'm only one individual and probably totally meaningless in the 1C scheme of things but, having wasted over 15 months of my time endlessly waiting for that next release, I have decided not to bother.

Gee I hope so. This sim or its creators don`t deserve to be insulted by the likes of you.

ATAG_MajorBorris

06-23-2012 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek (Post 436872)

I find this dreaming and the blind faith in the ability of anonymous modders very harebrained.

95% of the mods for the old IL2 were sub-standard, the level for il2-cod is a few steps higher.

The possibility of free mods for IL2-CoD in the level of MG quality is nil.

One should give MG the time to do it right, either they can fix it and most will be happy, or they drop the ball and the immense sum of about 70€ max. must be written of as false investment, which would be sad for all wwii-cfs fans.

I have to agree with robtek.

No disrespect towards modders but there is no way the modders are as good as the Maddox team:!:

The SDK argument holds little water for me.

Force10

06-23-2012 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robtek (Post 437229)

Oh, but it does work, not perfectly, not even very satisfactorily for quite a few, but it works good enough to have fun with it, if one wants it.

Tell that to the folks that run XP and DX9. They got swindled, pure and simple.

bongodriver

06-23-2012 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Force10 (Post 437343)

Tell that to the folks that run XP and DX9. They got swindled, pure and simple.

Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.

ACE-OF-ACES

06-23-2012 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 437353)

Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.

Because that kind of logic get in the way of thier agenda! ;)

furbs

06-23-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 437353)

Why have they? it seems to me the main hold up with the patch is to make sure the DX9 guys are looked after.

They dont give a hoot about the COD DX9 guys, DX9 has been pony from the start, they are only making sure DX9 is ok for the MMO.

bongodriver

06-23-2012 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 437381)

They dont give a hoot about the COD DX9 guys, DX9 has been pony from the start, they are only making sure DX9 is ok for the MMO.

Can you explain why exactly DX9 is essential for an MMO?

furbs

06-23-2012 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 437383)

Can you explain why exactly DX9 is essential for an MMO?

I never said it was essential, im saying the DX9 fix is for the next release, the DX9 fix for COD is just a bi-product.
If they HAD to fix DX9 for COD because its on the box, it would have been done before release.

bongodriver

06-23-2012 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by furbs (Post 437391)

So why do they need to bother fixing DX9 at all then?

SlipBall

06-23-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bongodriver (Post 437393)

So why do they need to bother fixing DX9 at all then?

They need it fixed for the MMO, and they want to attract as many new blood players worldwide as possible. For the new game they need to reach for large player base, IMHO

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Page 5 of 7

« First

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page