Beowulf,

that is really too hard on the typical fighterpilots ego, after all they are the majority on the usual servers, taking themselves much too much important. :D :D :D

Escorts
 

To bad fighters cant recieve points for successful escort :-P

I'm not a fan of that, either, simply because individual ground targets are not a criteria to evaluate the performance of a medium bomber. Theirs were are targets such as railway stations, critical supply roads and all those things which the military calls "lines of communication". IMO anyone who flies a bomber, Stuka or dedicated ground-attack aircraft (but not fighter-bombers) should get a point value per survived mission, maybe 0.1 points so that 10 survived missions equate one aerial victory over a single-engined fighter.

The problem with area targets in general is that they'd need to have a function so that damaging or destroying them would have a direct impact on certain aspects of gameplay. But for that a full-blown supply system would have to be programmed and that is a beast to do right. :-?

Type:Bug


Aircraft:Ju88


Description:Low FPS when in cockpit.


Tested:Online


Workarounds:Lower graphics settings helps a little.


Additional Information: When panning the view in cockpit of a Ju88 while the engines are running, severe fps hit when looking at the engine especialy when parked.

Can we all agree that things like scoring or "destructible airfields" (lol?) are currently at the other end of the universe?
I hope this thread rouses itself back up regarding bomber bugs...

Redroach's universe
 

Though I am of the opinion that CoD online mission editors have been neglected to some degree and that missions that are exciting and immersive have as much importance to the success of CoD/Bombers as anything, Im sure Blackdog will edit this thread and push the bugs to the top and related banter to the bottom.

Thank you Redroach for your honesty but I must ask, are you doing anything to help the bombers on this side of the universe?

I wrote/inquired about numerous bugs, bomber and non-bomber, over a year ago. Still pending, though.

Some updates for you
 

I did some more test flights for you Blackdog. The BR. 20 bug is solvable by returning to the pilot and toggling the brake since the AI engages it while it's trying to take off. Some new glitches that I found while flying: the BR 20's instruments go to low resolution if you crash land and survive which is just an annoyance factor rather than a true bug, the Ju 87 when crash landed as well, has double examples of certain things, and finally the Ju 88's gunners have glitched trigger fingers where it won't shoot at once and there is no reload animation for it.
Sorry for not putting it into proper form but I didn't have much time to write this up in order to do such since I have to get things prepared for a service project that I am going off to for a week.

Eagle

As long as the tangent discussions

1) stay relevant to the use of bombers in the sim and
2) don't outnumber the bug reporting posts( if they do, then there is enough interest to have their own thread)

i'm fine with it.

I just haven't had the time to edit everything into the list yet, i hope i'll be able to do it during the weekend. Keep up the good work everyone :cool:

I flew the 109E-4 on ATAG tonight and noticed that the auto prop pitch didn't work properly. I had to put it in manual for take-off and only engage auto when up high and at speed and then it worked ok. Also, the arming panel for the bombs seemed to not work any longer: no switch to toggle with mouse.

Before the patch there was no problem with either auto pitch or bomb arming in the E-4.

Do anyone have the same issues? - Sorry if this has already been mentioned.