Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=189)
-   -   Friday Update - December 9, 2011 (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=28376)

JG53_Valantine 12-09-2011 05:34 PM

Good to hear some news, although it's pretty much confirmed the oppinion I've held for a while now that efforts have been shifted to a sequel rather than fixing the current issues with CloD, the missing proper co-op mode and launcher freezes/crashes / memory leaks are the most fustrating for me.
I hope that any sequel they do release is akin to past IL2 experiences of being able to be "merged" otherwise the money spent on CloD I will personally feel is a little wasted.
I'll still probably get the sequel, but I'll not be rushing out on release day to get it after the constant disappointements with the current product. (oh and pelase don't get me wrong, I love CloD and the potential it has, I'd just like it patched and made stabler before talk of a sequel)
V

Bonkin 12-09-2011 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MD_Titus (Post 368583)
for anyone struggling with basic comprehension and having some kind of aneurysm as a result - sequel means add-on. think il2 forgotten battles, with pacific fighters, with aces expansion, with 1946. it's all the same game, just large chunks of content that are added on. it's not a separate game, it's not abandonment of cliffs of dover, it's additions to the core game which will benefit the core game as well as expanding the theatres available.

Sequel does not mean add-on. It could be an add-on but it's not certain. Certainly it's what I think we all hope for. For reference Cpt_Farrel asked the question and BS himself said he didn't know:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cpt_Farrel (Post 368537)
Regarding the changes that will come with the sequel, will Cliffs of Dover benefit from them too, like IL-2 and Pacific Fighters?

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSix (Post 368563)
I myself don't know yet


Other than that I think its good to get the feedback but I'm extremely disappointed by the lack of dynamic weather, i.e. having to wait for the sequel.

Force10 12-09-2011 05:38 PM

I'm not happy hearing there is a sequel coming. I have shelved this thing waiting for a good patch since purchase, and now that there is a sequel coming it would seem there is a time set already when support will stop for this title. They only way I would pay for a sequel is if they have this thing patched 100% and is the game it was hyped by the devs to be.

6S.Manu 12-09-2011 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JG53_Valantine (Post 368601)
Good to hear some news, although it's pretty much confirmed the oppinion I've held for a while now that efforts have been shifted to a sequel rather than fixing the current issues with CloD, the missing proper co-op mode and launcher freezes/crashes / memory leaks are the most fustrating for me.
I hope that any sequel they do release is akin to past IL2 experiences of being able to be "merged" otherwise the money spent on CloD I will personally feel is a little wasted.
I'll still probably get the sequel, but I'll not be rushing out on release day to get it after the constant disappointements with the current product. (oh and pelase don't get me wrong, I love CloD and the potential it has, I'd just like it patched and made stabler before talk of a sequel)
V

IMO there is not a real effort shifting.

Simply the 3D modellers work in CloD is done; they are working on BoM planeset (they are not programmers!) while the other guys are still developing the core of the sim, who will be the same for CloD and BoM (being merged; it would be insane to release 2 different games).

150GCT_Veltro 12-09-2011 05:44 PM

Quote:

14. Will you do further work on weather effects (rain, thunderstorm and so forth)?


Quote:
Yes, for the sequel.
Are you joking guys?

Sven 12-09-2011 05:51 PM

Did they had a lot rain and thunderstorms in that hot summer of 1940?

Insuber 12-09-2011 05:54 PM

If the sequel is merged, no problem. And logics and history point on that direction. But I'm afraid that patching CloD with a completely new graphic engine + other modifications could prove being more complex than it was for Il2 with Forgotten Battles. Ultimately we can see an entirely new game, standalone, just because of an incompatibility with the new gen engine. I give it a 50/50 chance. Wait and see ... :-D

Dano 12-09-2011 05:55 PM

What would you rather, development goes to the sequel and we get to buy it or not (it is after all, your choice) with additional features that were originally slated for COD or that funds dry up and we get maybe a couple more patches and development ceases?

I know it's not ideal and people have every right to be disappointed but at some point reality has to come into it doesn't it?

Anyway, thank you for the update BlackSix, much appreciated :)

Dano 12-09-2011 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheesehawk (Post 368610)
This is no better than EA's fiasco with the BF3-PS3 promise, which they reneged on. This community isn't big enough, but I hope someone has the balls/money to take these guys to court over this.

What possible good do you actually see coming from such a course of action?

merlin1 12-09-2011 05:58 PM

Sorry guys.

This is not, what I am waithing for.

Update for me is only news about fixing a gameplay.(microstutters, FPS drops to 3 -20 is still there).
The game is stil unplayable. My prediction on the outcome of sophisticated versions for Christmas this year, unfortunately, will not be realized.

By the way, I announced this one year ago.


rgr.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.