+1

http://images.fanpop.com/images/imag...75_355_475.jpg

KEEP IT REAL :):)

+1
no compromise, we want realism!

At least make a option for the changes u made!!
Thank you for the great sim!

+1 for this petition!

Signed by Me ;)

+1

I'm the only one that was having fun with the carburetors planes behavior ? I was very happy with this new step in realism.

I was having really fun flying the Spitfire and the Hurricane, learning to keep my G on the engine on loops and turns.

This just kill my fun right now.

This change should be optional in the Disable Realism Options, not forced to all.

Please keep the carburetors engines behavior available to those who want a full simulation.

Dumbed down - no way! This happened to Il-2 and I do hope that CloD will not go down that route.

Corrected - absolutely.

The positive G cutout (which should have been a -ve G cutout) was IMO, with a bit of knowledge about engines and after reading the lengthy discussions, overdone.

Making an RPM gauge which did not bounce around was not above the capabilities of 1930s technology.

Definitely in the realm of corrections, still.

+1,000,000,000.

Yes, please don't listen to players if you are certain it's historically correct.
And if it's absolutely necessary add it as a realism option..

This makes me question the other parts of the game, have there been other compromises on historical accuracy to make some things more comfortable to certain players?

I completely agree.

Also for those who don't like cut outs: use the "No Complex Engine Management" if you don't like it (and I am a Spit flyer)

Anyhow I think the problem with the cut out are not the values that are fine but probably there was expected to be a more inert behaviour from 1g to 0.25g than right now. That is what probably caused some trouble

or
perhaps and more likely it was only because the feedback coming from the game (sound, smoke) was too strong so it felt as if the cut out was overmodelled (I highly believe that it was just a too strong audio and video feedback than really a problem of FM).

+1