![]() |
Quote:
Any other program? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think we just have to wait for the patch... |
Quote:
|
Hallo jimbop,
Thank you (and everybody else) for the interesting contribution! I did have fun with these two tools (which I did not know they even exist) and spent some time trying to understand how they work (despite your invaluable explanations on how to set things up). I think IQ-tests became obsolete now that we have things like that... :D One thing you may need to add to your explanations (if I got it to work right), After having: Quote:
(after the creation I turned UAC on and the system was working without problems) Quote:
This will make now everything stay in the RAM of your PC (without this option ticked, the image is loaded from your hard disk, which make no difference in performance). You can check if this worked as expected by watching the memory usage in your Task-Manager window. This program is great because the ramdisk-image is ready on your hdd and with one commands it loads it on your RAM, great job, I had no idea that somebody had done such a good job! ---------------------- Also during installation of the Link Shell Extension, if you have problems, you may have to disable your Antivirus for a moment (it solved my installation problem). Now, coming to the juicy part, no it did not make any difference to my performance :( On second thought, I think I never had stutters... But the accumulated experience and knowledge was great :) ~S~ |
Thanks 335th_GRAthos, I've updated the OP. Doesn't make any difference for me now that I have upgraded either! It did seem to make a difference in stutter on my previous system but there was no difference in average FPS even then.
Certainly a fun learning process though! A good set of applications as you say. |
Nothing happens here too.
850MB RAMDISK (bob_3do.SFS, bob_buildings.SFS and bob_ground.SFS) 4GB total RAM memory, Phenom X4 3.4GHz, ATI HD 4050 512MB. |
Makes me wonder about the point of SSDs apart from loading time?
|
What makes me wonder is this question:
- Devs are so stupid that don't put into their softwares checks for amout of RAM available in each hardware? I don't think so. I believe IL-2 COD check the RAM available and load all the data possible to avoid loading stutters, and what we see now is simple lack of optimization/bugs, don't solved by this solution. In ArmAII all this "voodoo" is placebo too. |
Quote:
Mind also that a lot of limitations arise from loading/ unloading a lot of graphics details from the hard disk on to the RAM and, the Video RAM (as the plane flies over large distances). So there is something to be won. Now, it all depends by the speed of your hard disk (ms, cache, NCQ, transfer rate, fragmantation) and yes, you may get serious stutters. Since a lot of us bit the bullet and spent a lot of money on new HW and new hard disks, I believe most of us have very optimised hardware (thus no stutters). But for some people it may be of help. I believe a RAMDRIVE is better than a SSD because (hopefully) the transfer rate should be much faster (the SSD has to go through the SATA channel after all). Anyway, I increased my RAM by 6Gb to 12GB because I was curious yesterday. Created a 6Gb RAMDISK and loaded the whole CoD on it. I can not say I noticed any substantial difference (on the other side, I do not think I ever had stutters either). I run SLI GTX570 and my problem is that over land the GPU utilisation drops at 50%-60% against 99% over sea and wanted to see if the RAMDISK would solve some of this. It did not really although I noticed at times that my GPUs went to 70%-80% above land. On the other side, I was flying yesterday on the REPKA server for about 1,5hrs at nice 50fps and no stutter at all and very smooth game (it looks to me more like a placebo effect). ~S~ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.