Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Technical threads (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=191)
-   -   Pathetic performance (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=19763)

Dutchinlive 03-31-2011 10:04 AM

Yeah, I'm going to jump on the bandwagon and say that my PC is well over the recommended specs for the game and I get an appalling framerate at the lowest settings.

Guys, please, take your time, work out what's going on, and fix it, I've been looking forward to this a long time, and it's annoying that now it's here I can't play it.

TheGrunch 03-31-2011 10:05 AM

Very playable for me, even over land, with the occasional stutter. Less playable over London obviously. Seems like those with the most problems have NVidia cards, particularly those cards with less VRAM.

TheGrunch 03-31-2011 10:11 AM

Yeah, looks like it. Not much VRAM left there.

Flanker35M 03-31-2011 10:18 AM

S!

It is strange how CoD fills the VRAM so quickly and keeps it filled to the maximum at all times. Is it a feature or a possible memory leak? For example, as given in other thread, World of Tanks had a memory leak which caused the VRAM to clog up and game began to drop detail levels. Of course this helped only a bit until the memory was full again. In the end game became unplayable and graphical artifacts were an indication of this(red tiles on ground textures).

Does CoD automatically adjust detail levels in such situation? I doubt it if we have to restart the application in most cases when making changes in Video options.

Just a wild guess from my part when looking at those memory usages. From what I've been reading the 1Gb VRAM on a GPU is good enough until you go to very high resolutions with lot of FSAA enabled. In CoD many seem to use not more than 2-4x FSAA and less than 1920x1200 resolution, which is not out of reach on other games with a GPU having 1Gb or more VRAM.

Need to tweak a bit to see if it helps any..

TheGrunch 03-31-2011 10:48 AM

Oh, need to mention! I run at only 1280x1024 due to my crappy monitor. Too used to it now, don't really think about it. :confused: I'll let you know what difference 1680x1050 makes in about a week's time, not that it'll matter by then.

=XIII=Shea 03-31-2011 11:58 AM

WTF is goin on?
 
I have just downloaded COD,the game runs slow as hell even on low settings,thought my pc would be ok for the game on medium settings but the FPS is seriously bad,this game needs patching badly:evil::evil::evil:

Deadstick 03-31-2011 12:02 PM

Come on, how many days has the Russian version been out? And how many posts have there been about it?

You can't seriously tell me you expected it to be perfect on release?

speculum jockey 03-31-2011 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deadstick (Post 246336)
Come on, how many days has the Russian version been out? And how many posts have there been about it?

You can't seriously tell me you expected it to be perfect on release?

Playable! We were expecting it to be playable on release.

Deadstick 03-31-2011 12:26 PM

Quote:

Playable! We were expecting it to be playable on release.
Well...both of you have me on that one.:oops:

I can't even see pilots or aircraft in the menu let alone fly any missons. I have updated all the drivers I can...blah blah blah, anyway I think the premature release(:shock:) may have been out of the Maddox team's hands.

I am being philosophical on this, plus I am still really enjoying IL 2, so I can wait.

machoo 03-31-2011 12:30 PM

Well , it's been 6 years. How long is a piece of string....

Probably Ubisoft got fed up with waiting , we'd probably be waiting another few years if 1c had there way


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.