Eh, Aviar ... was it really necessary to save those screenshots in this large resolution and as BMP? JPGs of 800x600 would have been sufficient and much faster in loading. :(

I found a bizzare issue with the SM.79. it is the only plane in all of the planes in IL-2 that the controls do not respond to key inputs for the flaps. Why does this only happen to this plane?

Thanx..

Auto-flaps, ramstein. Auto-flaps. ;)

Yeah, I was just reading about these... No control at all at certain speeds..
wtf... why would anyone design it like that.. no wonder the plane was outdated by 1940..

I was getting some other weird responses from certain key commands, but decidecd not to bring those up intil I fugure out what else this plane is weird with..

It is a compromise - the map is defined as a winter one, but with liquid water. You get winter default skins and solid water.

Still I do not understand how someone tries first to land on the water :-P but the screen is beautiful :-)

Thx, first i try to land on a river in the zero seaplan and than i saw somthing wrong so i did it again in this byplane to take the pic... enyway this is a great addon to the game, thx very much..

Guess what! A Jesus-style aircraft. It walks over water too :p

Sorry I coudn't find the track from the email, but I think I know what you mean. Problem with recorded tracks is that they don't store enough information so that all visual element could be replicated perfectly. However in game itself they should work ok.

For example skis are not aligned with ground when plane lands, since there is no information available that when they should turn. Problem doesn't exist with Gladiator's skis since they are always alignd with ground, but that's slightly incorrect behaviour for the skis.

I believe the P-51 is the same, I'll test some aircraft later today, though.

Actually, I just checked the P-51 (all models) and the contrails look fine.

Aviar