Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Friday 2011-02-04 Dev. update and Discussion (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=18564)

#402FOX 02-07-2011 11:52 AM

I never spot the one on my Six:grin:

swiss 02-07-2011 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t4trouble (Post 221357)
Swiss you talk alot of sense in these forums ~S~

I hope you weren't ironic.

You're the T4T from SoV, right?
It's was always great fun to watch you play with 5 enemies on your tail - and often even get away!
Your defensive skills rock.
8-)

Redwan 02-07-2011 12:10 PM

Oh ... my previous post has disapeared ... probably banned because I didn't say something positive about BoB ... (I was only saying: '4years of delay and the wheather effects won't even be available in the first release ... is it considered as trolling to say the truth ?)

Question to the moderators:

On this forum are we allowed to say that something looks wrong in BoB updates or will we be banned for 'Trolling' if we don't say what we really think (like during the bolchevic period ;-) ) ?

Sutts 02-07-2011 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redwan (Post 221366)
Oh ... my previous post has disapeared ... probably banned because I did't say something positive about BoB ... (I was saying: '4years of delay and the wheather effects won't even be available in the first release ... is it considered as trolling to say the truth ?)

Question to the moderators:

On this forum are we allowed to say that something looks wrong in BoB updates or will we be banned for 'Trolling' if we don't say what we really think (like during the bolchevic period ;-)

That doesn't sound terribly constructive to me Redwan. I'm not surprised the mod took issue.

I'm sure many of us are disappointed about the dynamic weather but venting in the update thread isn't going to bring it back.

swiss 02-07-2011 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hecke (Post 221358)
I play at Full HD (1920x1080) and it's very hard to spot an enemy.

You have to spot him ~2.5km away - even at hd he has enough pixels to spot him.

This not addresses only at you but all those who share this pixel disadvantage opinion:

1. SA can not be compensated with more pixels.

2. Even if you spot him at 200km and you have an alt advantage of 2km - if he's an ace, he will whoop your a$$ whatever you do.

There are people out there with 10'000s of kills and several thousand flying hours - even if you had an AWACS you wouldn't stand the slightest chance.
It's the pilot not the pixels.
;)

Redwan 02-07-2011 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sutts (Post 221368)
That doesn't sound terribly constructive to me Redwan. I'm not surprised the mod took issue.

I'm sure many of us are disappointed about the dynamic weather but venting in the update thread isn't going to bring it back.

Why do you think that talking about the weak points of BoB isn't constructive ?

If the wheather effects are not nice why can't I say it ?

swiss 02-07-2011 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redwan (Post 221371)
Why do you think that talking about the weak points of BoB isn't constructive ?

If the wheather effects are not nice why can't I say it ?

1. where is the constructive part?
2. there are NO effects, so can't even dislike them
3. feel free to be disappointed, but please refer to point 1

kendo65 02-07-2011 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redwan (Post 221366)
Oh ... my previous post has disapeared ... probably banned because I didn't say something positive about BoB ... (I was only saying: '4years of delay and the wheather effects won't even be available in the first release ... is it considered as trolling to say the truth ?)

Question to the moderators:

On this forum are we allowed to say that something looks wrong in BoB updates or will we be banned for 'Trolling' if we don't say what we really think (like during the bolchevic period ;-) ) ?

May have had more to do with how you said it?

If people are respectful they can usually say what they want.

W32Blaster 02-07-2011 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swiss (Post 221369)
There are people out there with 10'000s of kills and several thousand flying hours - even if you had an AWACS you wouldn't stand the slightest chance. It's the pilot not the pixels. ;)

Maybe I want to make a decision, if I want to attack?!

Aireal combat is all about seeing the bogie or bandit first and move yourself in an good position for either retreat or attack.

It´s crucial to have the ability to realize a contact as early as possible.
I just dislike to screw down my resolution to visually recognize a bogie - because it might be overseen with higher resolution.

Therefor I ask for a mechanism to show contact in a comparable size.

Thus not having to cope with the downside of unrecognisable dots in higher resolution.

I think thats not to complicated to understand!

kendo65 02-07-2011 12:46 PM

I think we all understand what you're saying and that it is a disadvantage - but it's an unavoidable (?) consequence of using higher-res screens.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.