Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   IL-2 Sturmovik (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=98)
-   -   Patch 4.10 - Development Updates by Daidalos Team (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=12568)

MikkOwl 03-15-2010 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T.}{.O.R. (Post 149978)
I didn't doubt for a moment. Thanks for the reply! :)

Does not this post from (EDIT: Often when I post, it starts a new page) two pages before this one already answer your question in detail?

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...&postcount=438

T}{OR 03-15-2010 02:01 PM

It obviously does. And I missed it.

There was a time when I was able (had the time) to track all what is going on, but nowadays I am too busy to read the whole thread.

Oktoberfest 03-15-2010 02:10 PM

Hello,

about the board gunners, how will you be able to determine which plane from what player you are selecting ?

Thx.

MikkOwl 03-15-2010 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oktoberfest (Post 149983)
Hello,

about the board gunners, how will you be able to determine which plane from what player you are selecting ?

Thx.

Did you check the first post? They have a video showing it.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showpos...66&postcount=1

FrankB 03-15-2010 04:12 PM

Showcase missions?
 
Hi TD,

have you considered the idea of creating a sample mission or two for each of your patches demonstrating the content of the patch?

E.g.

4.09:
- static mission for Avia B/534 on a Slovakia map with some easy target (e.g. low-altitude bombing of car convoy in the mountain valley) to show the new plane and the best places on this wonderful map

4.10:
- mission for CW-21 on the Slot map showing / teaching the radio navigation
- mission for Ju-88 with the guided bombs

What concerns me is the fact that now, half a year after release of 4.09, I have not seen a single offline mission/campaign for the new maps (mod-free, of course).

Adwark 03-15-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IvanK (Post 149910)
Why must it be different? The overall design specification is that the structure must be able to withstand XX G at YY Weight. The designer then ensures his structure using his choice of materiel's meets the spec. a 10G structure is a 10G structure whether it is made of wood or steel, its failure modes may be slightly different though.

In the G limit routine each aircraft has its own unique profile.

You are right. Sorry my previous post not correct. I was agree, 10G structure is 10G structure and you are right about failure mode. I don't know how it working in game, but if we are looking in the "Resistance of materials" theory wood was quickly fatigue like aviation aluminum. And if in game was used that info, 10G wood construction must be broken faster like metal 10G structure. For example, 10G wood plane doing 4 over limit turns, but 10G full metal plane 5 or 6. That was took in game more realism.;) But of course game is game. I was watching on youtoobe.com WW2 documentary movie about B-17. One of them have a very heavy damaged tail, but crew return to base and successfully landing. In comments was written "thats gays is lucky", but this not a luck, This is, How to the "Resistance of materials" theory work in real life. If B-17 has a wood structure they doesn't be so lucky.

jamesdeanoo7 03-15-2010 09:05 PM

Is it possible?
 
Being new I guess what I am going to ask will be old hat but here goes. I really love this game and the mods but if we can release rockets in pairs why cant we release bombs the same way instead of a heap? Is it possible to have depth charges? Is it possible as we have shadows of the aircraft that converge in relation to their height, to have leigh lights fitted that act in the same way? Thanks guys and keep up the great work.:)

SaQSoN 03-15-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adwark (Post 150032)
"Resistance of materials" theory wood was quickly fatigue like aviation aluminum. And if in game was used that info, 10G wood construction must be broken faster like metal 10G structure.

Can you support your claim?

To my knowledge, wood, being a natural composite, is, actually, less affected by fatigue, then crystalline material such as metal.

I'd really like to see a Wöhler diagram for both wooden composite and aluminum spar of equal terminal strength...

jermin 03-15-2010 11:36 PM

then why aviators adopted metalic structure and abandoned wooden one while wood is better?

MikkOwl 03-15-2010 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jermin (Post 150056)
then why aviators adopted metalic structure and abandoned wooden one while wood is better?

Being better at a certain type of fatigue does not make it better at everything else. I am sure that metals are both much more durable all-round and have much better strength for any given size and mass. The Mosquito, for example, is very heavy.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.