Official Fulqrum Publishing forum

Official Fulqrum Publishing forum (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/index.php)
-   Movie Making and Videos (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Cliffs of Dover Video Thread V1.0 [Closed] (http://forum.fulqrumpublishing.com/showthread.php?t=19455)

Avionsdeguerre 04-15-2011 02:10 PM

A very nice vid wilburnator :)

ATAG_Doc 04-15-2011 03:05 PM

What is that guy saying over the radio about Dover?

SG1_Gunkan 04-15-2011 08:48 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wia-uzKBesQ

A video with SSAO on and reduced textures. Patch 1.00.14072

nearmiss 04-15-2011 09:34 PM

Funny everyone is so enthralled with the London scenery.

I'd like to see a good fighters vs fighters air battle over London with variations in the number of planes, until the FPS starts to drag.

Hopefully, it will take a large number of fighters in combat to drag down the FPS.

With the new patch installed of course

Heliocon 04-15-2011 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nearmiss (Post 264375)
Funny everyone is so enthralled with the London scenery.

I'd like to see a good fighters vs fighters air battle over London with variations in the number of planes, until the FPS starts to drag.

Hopefully, it will take a large number of fighters in combat to drag down the FPS.

With the new patch installed of course

Not to be a downer but imo
1. The city looks decidedly unimpresive, the textures look low res and ugly, not to mention its still creating fps problems.
2. In the distance there is no city just trees/grass, then suddenly buildings are magiced into existence, whats the point of being able to see that far if what you look at is not whats there? I would rather have limited distance/view because its less obnoxious.
3. London looks completely lifeless

I know its early days - hopefully these things are remidied, but atm I am very unimpressed by the city.

Space Communist 04-15-2011 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Heliocon (Post 264405)
Not to be a downer but imo
1. The city looks decidedly unimpresive, the textures look low res and ugly, not to mention its still creating fps problems.
2. In the distance there is no city just trees/grass, then suddenly buildings are magiced into existence, whats the point of being able to see that far if what you look at is not whats there? I would rather have limited distance/view because its less obnoxious.
3. London looks completely lifeless

I know its early days - hopefully these things are remidied, but atm I am very unimpressed by the city.

You forgot to mention which imaginary sim manages to do a large city better.

nearmiss 04-15-2011 11:43 PM

I recall buying an addon for the FSX that was great for night flying.

Cities were lighted and there were lights moving on the highways like you would see at night.

I liked the night flying, because it was closer to real. The navigation, the ATC, the charts, the whole instrument flight thing in all it's glory.

Too bad, I wanted to shoot at aircraft more than I wanted to follow strict instrument flights and make approaches/departures.

zakkandrachoff 04-16-2011 03:20 AM

this image is for those guys that said the bf109e yellow are bad and are like a plasick toy:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_hf92i8rLnr...600/Bf+109.JPG

:-)

Heliocon 04-16-2011 05:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Space Communist (Post 264430)
You forgot to mention which imaginary sim manages to do a large city better.

Never said there was, I am not comparing it to another sim, but to what hardware and software in 2011 is capable of.

Also WOP has a large Berlin map which looks better and runs flawlessly, and its a console game (then again it is also really well threaded on the PC).

conio 04-16-2011 01:50 PM

Tanks Battle
 
Just found this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6xGuqK42TU


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.