Not a blue field in sight.:)

Very interesting and informative video : this is exactly what I want to see in the sim (1).




(1) to the fanboys, again, I'm not asking here a perfect photorealistic rendering of the reality in the sim (I know it's not technically possible with our PC's), but a good choice of the color palette for the described area. Basically, I want to see the green of England.




P.S. Is the above film available/buyable somewhere in good quality ?
Is this a doc from the BBC ?

What you need is a scenery simulator.

SoW BoB wont be for you in this case .

Alpha, i will say it once more, ALL im talking about is the colours.
everything else ive seen from SOW looks great, and im sure it will be great.

I think you misappropriated some facts.

Sure you have to pay in RoF for every single plane, BUT first of all, in RoF every plane has his own individual physics and progressive flight engines. In IL2 the difference between the planes are only atttributes. You could not compare apples to oranges.

Sure it is better to pay nothing, than a few bugs, but if the quality is OK, i will pay for DC.

Agree about the tree placement in WOP - it's one of the main elements in producing a realistic effect.

I had a look at some WOP screenshots again today - and while overall I think it does currently have the edge, I don't think the gap is that big - really, with some more incremental shifts I can see SOW getting there.

(that's without mentioning the filtering and other issues where SOW already is ahead)

This all does come down to the colour palette issue - I really do think that people will be surprised at just how much things will come together when they get that tweaked. Just take it as a given. They'll sort it.

Notice also that hedgerows are turned off in the current screens. Also haven't seen waves on the shoreline yet. It's Work in Progress - it'll be sorted.

"What you need is a scenery simulator."

You obviously missed my "fayboy post-scriptum".

I know my English is far from being perfect, but I think it's nevertheless easy to understand that I'm not asking for a perfect photorealistic rendering (which, I know, is still not possible with the current personal computers), but just for a correct color palette for the described area (here, England), what has nothing to do with the technical capacities of our pc's.

I wonder what can be made of this comment,how far down the line would they have to be to get video card makers involved.

Dear Oleg maddox if simulator SoW not have the wind is negative.
wind is a important physic factor.
EXAMPLE direction of wind.
GLIDER airplane not fly if not have Wind.
Wind cold or wind hot.
http://www.soaringwear.com/uploadz/0.../ba8-Max34.jpg
glider airplane.
http://i87.servimg.com/u/f87/12/97/12/97/2009_059.jpg
instrument meteo for take direction and intensity of wind.

I think the same too. It's just seems people worry so much about anything they might not like, to the point of completely missing other things that are in fact very well done ;)